2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

Related:
boozed
Posts
644
Joined
6/11/2019
Location
AU
4/13/2026 10:50pm Edited Date/Time 4/13/2026 11:02pm
One Ghost wrote:
IMG 29491000023576.jpeg?VersionId=XfnN.pqcy
sluette wrote:

who failed ? The engineer who designed the caps for hexagon bolts? Or the fitter who just crammed in some Allen screws? 

As a prototype it might be mirrored and the hex bolt heads are just on the other side

5
Uncle Cliffy
Posts
366
Joined
3/11/2010
Location
Medford, OR US
4/13/2026 10:54pm
sluette wrote:

who failed ? The engineer who designed the caps for hexagon bolts? Or the fitter who just crammed in some Allen screws? 

Did you ever consider the possibility they’re machined with a hex to facilitate removal after the bolt inside them is removed? 

4
Primoz
Posts
4519
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
4/13/2026 11:01pm

But why have the internal bolt then? What is the function of it? 

Closing a grease port? 

Primoz
Posts
4519
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
4/13/2026 11:04pm
Nobble wrote:
If you draw a free body diagram you’ll find that the forces are the same for a given A2C length. Stiffness doesn’t change forces applied.Dual crown...

If you draw a free body diagram you’ll find that the forces are the same for a given A2C length. Stiffness doesn’t change forces applied.


Dual crown rated mostly means that it won’t instantly be destroyed if a fork bumper hits the side of the frame.

hardbash wrote:

In static cases that is true, in dynamic cases the stiffness influences the peak force that is transmitted.

TEAMROBOT wrote:
Thank you. This was my thought, too.If you drive a car without a crumple zone into a brick wall at high speed, even though the same...

Thank you. This was my thought, too.

If you drive a car without a crumple zone into a brick wall at high speed, even though the same total force is being applied to the wall and to your body, your body and the wall will notice a difference compared to hitting the same wall at the same speed in a car with a crumple zone.

In this analogy, the dual crown fork is the car w/o a crumple zone, transmitting all the force immediately to the headtube area, and the single crown fork is the car w/ a crumple zone, stretching out the time and peak dynamic forces being transmitted to the headtube area.

This. The energy dissipated is the same, the time doing it is different. 

If you have more flex (or more crumple zone), the distance of deceleration is longer. If the starting speed and end speed of this deceleration are the same, the average (and usually peak) deceleration are lower if the duration is longer. 

That's what gets you on the force front. Peak acceleration. F=m*a. 

5
metadave
Posts
1241
Joined
2/15/2016
Location
Revelstoke, BC CA
4/14/2026 1:20am

I know I'm a bit late to the Shimano pedal party, but I'd like to congratulate them for out Xpedo'ing Xpedo.

I feel like most saint platform pedals since the OG PX80's have fallen a little.... flat?

You can still get the PX80's, although a cheaper finish and likely a bearing quality downgrade, from Shimano in the GR500's. I feel like they've been chancing the popularity of these pedals since they dropped them.

3
63expert
Posts
186
Joined
9/10/2022
Location
Beaver, WV US
4/14/2026 2:00am
One Ghost wrote:
IMG 29491000023576.jpeg?VersionId=XfnN.pqcy

Make elevated chainstays great again

5
Brian_Peterson
Posts
1130
Joined
4/26/2011
Location
Canyon Country, CA US
4/14/2026 3:44am
One Ghost wrote:

I want to know who keeps downvoting me! Someone is a hater. 🤔😛

David , maybe because you are just posting pics with little to no context? 

25
piratetrails
Posts
280
Joined
8/28/2021
Location
Arcadia, VA US
4/14/2026 6:04am

New Nomad confirmed not dual crown compatible with the same blurb from the last version: "No. The Nomad frame is super strong but it is not designed for the side impact loads that dual crown forks place on the frame during a crash. Stick with single crown forks exclusively."

My wallet rejoices.

5
Nobble
Posts
225
Joined
9/24/2010
Location
Lakewood, CO US
4/14/2026 6:45am
hardbash wrote:

In static cases that is true, in dynamic cases the stiffness influences the peak force that is transmitted.

TEAMROBOT wrote:
Thank you. This was my thought, too.If you drive a car without a crumple zone into a brick wall at high speed, even though the same...

Thank you. This was my thought, too.

If you drive a car without a crumple zone into a brick wall at high speed, even though the same total force is being applied to the wall and to your body, your body and the wall will notice a difference compared to hitting the same wall at the same speed in a car with a crumple zone.

In this analogy, the dual crown fork is the car w/o a crumple zone, transmitting all the force immediately to the headtube area, and the single crown fork is the car w/ a crumple zone, stretching out the time and peak dynamic forces being transmitted to the headtube area.

Primoz wrote:
This. The energy dissipated is the same, the time doing it is different. If you have more flex (or more crumple zone), the distance of deceleration is...

This. The energy dissipated is the same, the time doing it is different. 

If you have more flex (or more crumple zone), the distance of deceleration is longer. If the starting speed and end speed of this deceleration are the same, the average (and usually peak) deceleration are lower if the duration is longer. 

That's what gets you on the force front. Peak acceleration. F=m*a. 

Energy is only dissipated if you permanently deform something. Otherwise it’s just temporarily stored. (Think about how springs would make a terrible crumple zone)


If you apply a given force (not acceleration) at the axle, the forces at the headset bearings are the same if you have a single or dual crown fork.


Think about a spring as an example. If you have a stiff spring and a soft spring and you apply 10lbf on one end. The softer spring will deflect more but both springs are going to have a 10lbf reaction on the opposite end.


I’m happy to continue this but we’d need to find a different thread.

10
4/14/2026 6:52am

Different thread! I can't find that imgur gif, but for those who know, dual crowns flex fore-aft a lot more than you think.  99% of the issue is from concerns over crashing.

5
seanfisseli
Posts
559
Joined
4/16/2024
Location
Santa Cruz, CA US
4/14/2026 7:39am
TEAMROBOT wrote:
Thank you. This was my thought, too.If you drive a car without a crumple zone into a brick wall at high speed, even though the same...

Thank you. This was my thought, too.

If you drive a car without a crumple zone into a brick wall at high speed, even though the same total force is being applied to the wall and to your body, your body and the wall will notice a difference compared to hitting the same wall at the same speed in a car with a crumple zone.

In this analogy, the dual crown fork is the car w/o a crumple zone, transmitting all the force immediately to the headtube area, and the single crown fork is the car w/ a crumple zone, stretching out the time and peak dynamic forces being transmitted to the headtube area.

Primoz wrote:
This. The energy dissipated is the same, the time doing it is different. If you have more flex (or more crumple zone), the distance of deceleration is...

This. The energy dissipated is the same, the time doing it is different. 

If you have more flex (or more crumple zone), the distance of deceleration is longer. If the starting speed and end speed of this deceleration are the same, the average (and usually peak) deceleration are lower if the duration is longer. 

That's what gets you on the force front. Peak acceleration. F=m*a. 

Nobble wrote:
Energy is only dissipated if you permanently deform something. Otherwise it’s just temporarily stored. (Think about how springs would make a terrible crumple zone)If you apply...

Energy is only dissipated if you permanently deform something. Otherwise it’s just temporarily stored. (Think about how springs would make a terrible crumple zone)


If you apply a given force (not acceleration) at the axle, the forces at the headset bearings are the same if you have a single or dual crown fork.


Think about a spring as an example. If you have a stiff spring and a soft spring and you apply 10lbf on one end. The softer spring will deflect more but both springs are going to have a 10lbf reaction on the opposite end.


I’m happy to continue this but we’d need to find a different thread.

This is exactly why suspension on bikes doesn’t work! Springs don’t dissipate energy they just transfer it to the other side! /s

4
1
sspomer
Posts
6015
Joined
6/26/2009
Location
Boise, ID US
4/14/2026 8:01am

e*thirteen with sidekick 2.0 hubs. video at bottom explains it all.

e*thirteen introduces Sidekick 2.0 hubs, delivering a lighter, faster, and more accessible "chainless" suspension experience with no pedal kickback for all levels and disciplines of MTB and eMTB. It features a 9º fast engagement setting, up to 38% weight savings, near-zero coasting drag, and a 10-year warranty.

KEY FEATURES
- Evolution of "Chainless" Performance: Uses a patented, pusher-activated ratchet that fully decouples the drivetrain and suspension during coasting, allowing the rear wheel to track the ground in the suspension's "sweet spot."
- Faster Engagement Option: New 9° engagement setting for trail riding and e-bikes where quicker feel is preferred.
- Tool-Free Deadband Adjustment: 9°, 13°, and 18° settings can be adjusted trailside to tune suspension isolation.
- Magnetic Pawl System: Replaces traditional wire springs with a durable magnetic retraction system.
- Reduced Friction: 30% less friction and coasting drag compared to the original Sidekick.
- Durability: Pro-tier hubs feature upgraded bearings and nickel-plated pawls.

PRODUCT MODELS

Screen Shot 2026-04-14 at 8.11.11 AM
1. Sidekick
  - MSRP: $249.95
  - Engagement: 9/13/18 Degrees
  - Specs: J-Bend 148mm (300g); XD, MS, or HG Driver
  - Anti-kickback performance for any full-suspension rider.

Screen Shot 2026-04-14 at 8.10.51 AM

2. Sidekick Pro
  - MSRP: $349.95
  - Engagement: 9/13/18 Degrees
  - Specs: J-Bend 148mm (300g) or Straight Pull 148mm (275g); XD, MS, or HG Driver
  - Pro-level performance and finishing.

Screen Shot 2026-04-14 at 8.10.37 AM.png?VersionId=87nazz4DB6VaTog9dm

3. Sidekick GR
  - MSRP: $399.95
  - Engagement: 12/15/18 Degrees
  - Specs: J-Bend 148mm (424g); XD, MS, or HG Driver
  - Heavy Enduro, DH, and E-MTBs (reinforced shell, steel axle).

WARRANTY & AVAILABILITY
- Warranty: 10-year warranty with a lifetime guarantee on bearings (free bearings for the original owner).
- Service: Fully rebuildable and designed for easy home service.
- Availability: April 14th, 2026.

3
sspomer
Posts
6015
Joined
6/26/2009
Location
Boise, ID US
4/14/2026 8:59am

FOX Float X2 Live Valve Neo is here with all the deets below

FOX Float X2 Live Valve Neo - Own Gravity - Own Traction
FOX Factory is proud to introduce the most advanced gravity shock on the market - the Float X2 Live Valve Neo

Floatx2Neo

FOX Factory is redefining gravity suspension once again with the introduction of the FLOAT X2 Live Valve Neo—a groundbreaking combination of the most advanced air shock in mountain biking and the fastest electronic MTB suspension system ever developed.

Bringing together the unmatched tunability and performance of FLOAT X2 with the real-time responsiveness of Live Valve Neo, this new platform delivers a level of traction, control, and speed that has never before been possible.

The Perfect Setting—In Every Moment

Trail conditions change constantly. Rider inputs change instantly. The FLOAT X2 Live Valve Neo adapts just as fast. At the core of the system is Live Valve Neo, which reads terrain and rider inputs 400 times per second, automatically opening or firming the shock’s compression circuit in as little as 1/70th of a second. The result is suspension that is:

- Firm when efficiency matters 
- Plush when traction is critical  
- Optimized at every moment on the trail

Unlike other electronic systems, Live Valve Neo is fast enough to confidently default to a firmer setting—without interrupting ride feel. This ability has already proven itself at the highest levels of racing, helping professional gravity athletes achieve winning performances.

Floatx2Neo2.jpg?VersionId=NfnqlD7LyGNxMGeEQo.F636B

The Definitive Gravity Shock—Now Faster

The FLOAT X2 has long been recognized as the definitive gravity air shock—delivering exceptional sensitivity, support, and adjustability for Enduro and Downhill racing.  With Live Valve Neo integration, that performance is elevated even further.
Monotube construction increases durability and enables pressure balancing, improving damping response and consistency under the highest loads.

Live Suspension Gives You More

Live Valve Neo doesn’t replace rider preference—it enhances it.  A 7-position Firm Mode adjust dial allows riders to fine-tune how supportive the shock feels when firmed, while The Low Speed Compression and High Speed/Low Speed Rebound dials let riders dial in their ideal descending performance. Our FOX Bike App provides the opportunity to further adapt Live Valve Neo to your ride style - with preset tunes or customization through our Precision Mode adjustments.

The combination of pressure-balanced damping, 4-way adjustability, and ultra-fast electronic control creates a system that keeps tires glued to the ground while maintaining chassis stability at speed. The ride sensation is often compared to a trophy truck—where the bike remains composed while the suspension absorbs the terrain beneath it.

For gravity riders, that translates directly into:

- Increased traction
-Reduced fatigue
- Greater confidence at speed

Floatx2Neo3

Own the Moment

The FLOAT X2 Live Valve Neo represents a new benchmark in suspension performance—where cutting-edge mechanical engineering meets real-time electronic intelligence. Because in gravity, speed comes from control—and control comes from traction. 

FOX FLOAT X2 Neo Product Pages
USA: https://ridefox.com/pages/fox-float-x2-live-valve-neo-learn-more

CAN: https://ca.ridefox.com/pages/fox-float-x2-live-valve-neo-learn-more

AUS: https://au.ridefox.com/pages/fox-float-x2-live-valve-neo-learn-more

Floatx2Neo4

Float X2 Neo Highlights
- F-S and P-SE Neo Wireless
- CAN bus version custom for ORBEA
- Trunnion and standard eyelet options
- Wide range of sizes
- 3-way adjustable – high and low speed rebound, low speed compression
- Tool-free rebound and compression adjusters
- 750g (210x55)
- Uses same battery as all other Neo products
- Pressure Balanced Monotube architecture for GRIP X2 fork damper-level performance in a rear shock
- Larger 1/2” diameter shaft for increased strength and durability
- 1cc increment air volume adjustments for ultra-pre- cise spring rate tuning (Max 350psi)
- Updated Variable Valve Control (VVC) on high-speed rebound
- Parallel reservoir orientation available for frame clearance (select sizes)
- 7-click Firm mode adjust, 11-click Low-Speed com pression (same as LV Neo Float X/DHX)

Sizes and Pricing

Screen Shot 2026-04-14 at 8.19.07 AMScreen Shot 2026-04-14 at 8.19.21 AM.png?VersionId=oALok2izNeQIoCz7 6GtecgmiVrSep
4
matmattmatthew
Posts
357
Joined
6/14/2014
Location
Fresh Prince of Bel Air, MD US
4/14/2026 10:10am

I have to admit, the new Sidekick hub has me really interested.  Looks like they made a lot of tangible improvements.  I wish they had included a sound clip of the hub coasting. Onyx hubs have spoiled me over the years. 

8
MTBrent
Posts
104
Joined
7/7/2015
Location
Concord, NH US
4/14/2026 10:18am

Pour one out for the new Bosch-based Ibis Oso...

8
9
4/14/2026 10:41am
MTBrent wrote:

Pour one out for the new Bosch-based Ibis Oso...

They missed the DJI train but amongst that and a normal rear triangle, the lede was buried a bit: there's different links so you can change the travel in addition to modular dropouts if 435mm chainstays aren't your fancy

6
2
segamethod
Posts
70
Joined
4/26/2024
Location
Anaheim, CA US
4/14/2026 11:07am Edited Date/Time 4/14/2026 11:08am
Jof wrote:
Clash V3 now with UDH https://www.commencal.com/en/search?cgid=bike-bikes-enduro-clashv3

I'm honestly little shook that the stay members are physically that long but chainstay measurement is an absolutely tucked 434mm across all sizes.

2
1
Ambushell
Posts
29
Joined
3/30/2020
Location
Aurora, CO US
4/14/2026 11:23am
MTBrent wrote:

Pour one out for the new Bosch-based Ibis Oso...

Avinox is over-hyped. This new Oso is just about ideal as a non-ebike owner. It seems to be very thoughtfully designed.  My only hangup is the price ($2k more than the old one). I still hope they do an SL version.

Also, I think the modular dropouts bode well for the next HD6. I heard a rumor that will be dual 29. Or will it be the HD7? 6... 7? hmm.

10
1
Poleczechy
Posts
243
Joined
4/20/2018
Location
Hartsel, CO US
4/14/2026 12:17pm
MTBrent wrote:

Pour one out for the new Bosch-based Ibis Oso...

Ambushell wrote:
Avinox is over-hyped. This new Oso is just about ideal as a non-ebike owner. It seems to be very thoughtfully designed.  My only hangup is the...

Avinox is over-hyped. This new Oso is just about ideal as a non-ebike owner. It seems to be very thoughtfully designed.  My only hangup is the price ($2k more than the old one). I still hope they do an SL version.

Also, I think the modular dropouts bode well for the next HD6. I heard a rumor that will be dual 29. Or will it be the HD7? 6... 7? hmm.

We are Oso close to getting a full 29 HD6/HD7...

16
4/14/2026 12:33pm
ebruner wrote:
I did email santacruz once about putting a dual crown on my nomad 6.  They said (obviously) that it was officially not supported and stated the...

I did email santacruz once about putting a dual crown on my nomad 6.  They said (obviously) that it was officially not supported and stated the frame was more then stiff enough for a dual crown fork, but not reinforced for the fork bumpers hitting the side of the head tube.  They did say to officially, un-officially send pictures if i followed through with it, and told me that despite being rad... it would completely void the warranty.  

I’ve had a similar conversation with them about a Megatower 2 Frame, they don’t state anywhere it’s not compatible, and their concern is not about the flex put through the frame, only the potential impact forces. But impact forces can happen regardless of what fork you have if you’re unlucky and hit a tree or rocks etc and stated unofficially that if something were to happen it would be wise to not have a dual crown installed when submitting warranty claims etc .. 

1
1
jofish
Posts
262
Joined
8/24/2009
Location
GB
4/14/2026 2:12pm Edited Date/Time 4/14/2026 2:23pm
One Ghost wrote:

I want to know who keeps downvoting me! Someone is a hater. 🤔😛

Personally I don’t think it’s cool when brands post their own stuff here if it’s not being discussed directly. The Cascade guy is great because he weighs in on the conversation but just dropping your stuff here when nobody is talking about it comes across as a bit of a lazy marketing strategy. Post it on instagram and if people think it’s interesting it’ll get picked up.

That being said it’s an awesome looking prototype!

14
2
Goose80
Posts
12
Joined
8/8/2019
Location
NZ
4/14/2026 2:40pm

Can someone with better pause-skills than me see what Zerode is teasing in their recent Instagram post?

https://www.instagram.com/p/DXECaeMlAfD/?igsh=NncxYm4xbnZneGxx

I believe it's an updated katipo but will be under a new name. Updated geo (fairly middle of the road), mullet compatible flip chip etc.

3
jones007
Posts
19
Joined
12/9/2025
Location
SEASIDE, CA US
4/14/2026 4:33pm
Nobble wrote:
If you draw a free body diagram you’ll find that the forces are the same for a given A2C length. Stiffness doesn’t change forces applied.Dual crown...

If you draw a free body diagram you’ll find that the forces are the same for a given A2C length. Stiffness doesn’t change forces applied.


Dual crown rated mostly means that it won’t instantly be destroyed if a fork bumper hits the side of the frame.

hardbash wrote:

In static cases that is true, in dynamic cases the stiffness influences the peak force that is transmitted.

TEAMROBOT wrote:
Thank you. This was my thought, too.If you drive a car without a crumple zone into a brick wall at high speed, even though the same...

Thank you. This was my thought, too.

If you drive a car without a crumple zone into a brick wall at high speed, even though the same total force is being applied to the wall and to your body, your body and the wall will notice a difference compared to hitting the same wall at the same speed in a car with a crumple zone.

In this analogy, the dual crown fork is the car w/o a crumple zone, transmitting all the force immediately to the headtube area, and the single crown fork is the car w/ a crumple zone, stretching out the time and peak dynamic forces being transmitted to the headtube area.

Static and dynamic climbing rope also comes to mind. Hanging on the two ropes, loads are the same, as a freebody diagram would suggest. A 40' whiper on a dynamic rope is survivable, maybe even fun. 40' whiper on a static rope is a potentially life ending event, both for you and the rope. Something to be said for slowing down the acceleration over a bit of time.

10
jones007
Posts
19
Joined
12/9/2025
Location
SEASIDE, CA US
4/14/2026 4:37pm
sspomer wrote:

queue @CascadeComponents  for blingy aftermarket trash can upgrades?

Big Bird wrote:

Billet trash can!

I'm holding out for 3D printed Ti

3

Post a reply to: 2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

The Latest