All

Taken from Ari’s Instagram video: Looks like the bag was left off for the bike build for the usdh race this weekend.

The problem with internal cable routing really comes down to the fact that suspension forks currently don't allow for hidden hoses. I think, based on what happened in road and gravel, that if that possibility existed, headset cable routing would become extremely common. I think a lot of brands were worried about the sales floor problem that happened with road bikes of having a rats nest compete with an integrated bike. Imagine how much money some brands lost as a result of that. Add to that, they are in a position where they have to predict the future, and they...

It's usually because there is some merit to the idea to begin with, and the development happens outside the publics view. Take headset routing, the real merit to it is that it allows for stronger lighter frames with internal routing, and less complicated carbon moulds, the downside is only on the consumer end having to work on it. Superboost wheels are objectively stronger and make a lot of sense, but it's competing with a standard that was more widely adopted and made it hard to swap wheels between frames. Wireless only is for the same reason as headset routing while...

Agreed. The only reason I have the bike I have now and not the TEMPO V1 is the headset routing. I had decided on the TEMPO and then one day realized it had headset routing. I couldn't believe it. It's SUCH a dumb idea that I didn't even think a bike brand as practical as Commencal seems to be would make a decision like that. But they did. And I bet it cost them a lot of sales.

Do any industry folks have some inside baseball into how decisions that eventually get walked back like headset routing, wireless only (Santa Cruz walking back in new Nomad launch video), and even Super Boost get through in the first place? To us common folk, this was the obvious outcome of all of those choices, but I want to believe the industry is not really that out of touch with their customer.

That is honestly all that bike needed!

Commencal quietly dropped the Tempo "V2" with the only revision being they got rid of the headset cable routing. (praise be!)

I have been running a 32" front wheel on my epic all year. Started out with my normal 35mm stem and riser bars and I had a hard time keeping the front end under control. Tried out a drop stem and it brought my weight back forward and the front end was much better. Bike is very fun still and very fast. I personally think it still handles very well even in the tight stuff. Despite the wild looking stem it's comfortable and feels normal. The bigger wheel just raised the front end so much that the bars are in...

To make that XL Trek 32" fit me, I'd need about an 80mm positive stem and 50mm riser bars. I know there aren't that many people who are 6'6"+, but surely there are more of them than there are 5'2" people who would actually buy that bike, right?

reminds me of this from my youth.

32" gravel is so out of date, we're doing 36ers now That's an XXL 29" Sentinel and it looks tiny... https://www.reddit.com/r/32inchbikes/comments/1wa3zpt/heres_my_new_36er…

As the first glimmer of the 32” era dawns, the Industry’s evil plan for 27.5 comes to light: the leftover 27.5 rims are to be stamped and converted into 120t rear sprockets for the new dominant Big Wheelers.

Looks about right for Lebron, so it must be AMAZING on the Small and Medium frames.🤣

It’s a grower, not a show-er

With looks as a deciding factor for bike sales I predict low sales...

Sorry for worlds worst geo chart. Not my fault, I swear!

Bike industry: 32" might make sense for tall people! Also the bike industry: Lots of small and medium 32" frames, no XXL frames.

https://www.cyclescience.co.nz/products/trek-2028-superfly-32-slr-9-7?v… Did this get posted yet? 32" superfly, spec, geo chart, etc. Assuming it's correct obviously. 469mm chainstay, 776 front center. 1.65 f/r ratio on a large... wow. I kind of think this means you'll be able to pedal through more corners. Mega bb drop, 70mm. It's like the bb is about the same height above the ground as before, just way lower than the axles now. Standover quite rough. 785, on paper much higher than like an epic, but not that much worse (1cm) than the supercaliber. 30T chainring. I wonder if 32" wheels will make SRAM rethink the...

... well for the most part, anyway.