2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

Related:
ntm95
Posts
100
Joined
12/25/2024
Location
Lloydminster, AB CA
2/17/2026 1:52pm
And, no offense to Norco, but I am not sure they'd be the first to market with a M2 Avinox motor. Atherton bikes said mid-April, so...

And, no offense to Norco, but I am not sure they'd be the first to market with a M2 Avinox motor. Atherton bikes said mid-April, so likely Sea Otter. 

Plus, as mentioned above, it doesn't appear to be wireless controllers. 

Forbidden will have the e-dreadnought, with m2 motor, in april-may time frame. Limited initial run.

9
overbiked
Posts
49
Joined
10/23/2024
Location
Park City, UT US
2/17/2026 1:54pm

Specialized updated levo software, S-works motor gets 850 watts, standard gets 810. 

4
dolface
Posts
1656
Joined
10/26/2015
Location
CA US
2/17/2026 1:57pm
overbiked wrote:

Specialized updated levo software, S-works motor gets 850 watts, standard gets 810. 

This feels like the thin edge of the subscription wedge to me...

Don't have an S-Works but want that extra 40w? Pay up!

21
1
2/17/2026 2:13pm
Evwan wrote:
According to the enduro mag test, XTR is more powerful than Dominion A4 and TRP DHR Evo, and close to the same power as mavens. I don't...

According to the enduro mag test, XTR is more powerful than Dominion A4 and TRP DHR Evo, and close to the same power as mavens. 

I don't think their lab test is an accurate reflection of real world riding, because it's definitely not what I have experienced.

 

The measured with the same, constant lever force. It is likely that at different lever forces the brakes behave differently compared to each other. So the test results and your real life experiences (where the finger force constantly varies) can both be true. Even more so when you factor in different brake pads, rotors, bleeds, etc.

11
jsray
Posts
216
Joined
5/20/2017
Location
Gilbert, AZ US
2/17/2026 2:16pm
overbiked wrote:

Specialized updated levo software, S-works motor gets 850 watts, standard gets 810. 

dolface wrote:

This feels like the thin edge of the subscription wedge to me...

Don't have an S-Works but want that extra 40w? Pay up!

I absolutely despise the nickel and diming us to death with subscriptions in just about every aspect of our lives, but on the other hand, someone has to prompt ChatGPT to write the code for the firmware updates.

 

8
1
Digit Bikes
Posts
180
Joined
9/22/2021
Location
Irvine, CA US
2/17/2026 2:33pm Edited Date/Time 2/17/2026 2:36pm
Evwan wrote:
I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. I see a few issues: 1. Shimano XTR, XT, and...

I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. 

I see a few issues: 

1. Shimano XTR, XT, and SLX all have the same mechanical and hydraulic power output, but the test results show them as being wildly different. 

2. They also show TRP DHR evo as dramatically underperforming XTR. Having used both, this is just incorrect... 

3. And lastly, XTR being next to Maven in terms of test results in laughable. XTR is a cross country brake compared to maven stopping power. 

Based on the wild discrepancy between mechanically equal shimano stoppers, I assume their test methodology has large error bars that we are not seeing in the data presented by them.

iceman2058 wrote:
Kinda derailing this thread now, but a couple of counter arguments:-XTR, XT, and SLX aren't "wildly" different in the results, there's about 10% decrease in recorded...

Kinda derailing this thread now, but a couple of counter arguments:

-XTR, XT, and SLX aren't "wildly" different in the results, there's about 10% decrease in recorded power between each of them with stock pads (they didn't test XT and SLX with the Sinter pads). Since they used the average of 20 decelerations, I would say there is some underlying (=real) reason for the differences.

-TRP's DH-R EVO always felt a bit low on brake-power-to-finger-power ratio for me, compared to several other brakes...

-remember that they tested with constant power at the lever (4 kg of force on the levers for all the test runs). With the same pads and rotors, I have no problem believing that the XTR can land next to the Maven at a specific, constant lever force. This doesn't mean that the Maven doesn't have more "headroom" to borrow a term from the audio world, but XTRs definitely develop quite a bit of stopping power without too much lever input. You call them "XC" brakes but that's just because they use slightly more exclusive materials to keep the weight in check, as you also pointed out they are based on the same mechanical/hydraulic layout as XT and SLX.

Anyway, this discussion should probably move to a brake thread now.

14
piratetrails
Posts
281
Joined
8/28/2021
Location
Arcadia, VA US
2/17/2026 6:46pm

Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires" rather than "for tubes", although I've had great success with a Park Tool VP-1 and even ShoeGoo in the past. This would be sick for pinch flats though.

2
1
1llumA
Posts
212
Joined
3/11/2020
Location
CA
2/17/2026 6:47pm
bturman wrote:
Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires"...

Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires" rather than "for tubes", although I've had great success with a Park Tool VP-1 and even ShoeGoo in the past. This would be sick for pinch flats though.

5
boozed
Posts
644
Joined
6/11/2019
Location
AU
2/17/2026 7:49pm Edited Date/Time 2/17/2026 7:56pm
bturman wrote:
Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires"...

Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires" rather than "for tubes", although I've had great success with a Park Tool VP-1 and even ShoeGoo in the past. This would be sick for pinch flats though.

I've had reasonable success using standard self-vulcanising patches on the inside of tubeless tyres

8
Uncle Cliffy
Posts
368
Joined
3/11/2010
Location
Medford, OR US
2/17/2026 8:04pm Edited Date/Time 2/17/2026 8:05pm
Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires"...

Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires" rather than "for tubes", although I've had great success with a Park Tool VP-1 and even ShoeGoo in the past. This would be sick for pinch flats though.

Because nobody is going to patch a tubeless tire on the side of the trail. Especially with an insert…

21
doktor_jawn
Posts
24
Joined
10/9/2019
Location
State College, PA US
2/17/2026 8:32pm

I guess I have never had bacon or other plugs fall out during the ride, though I could see it being a thing. So this could be a small improvement in those situations. Then you patch it at home, or just keep running it. 

2
JVP
Posts
207
Joined
4/20/2016
Location
Seattle, WA US
2/17/2026 9:57pm
I guess I have never had bacon or other plugs fall out during the ride, though I could see it being a thing. So this could...

I guess I have never had bacon or other plugs fall out during the ride, though I could see it being a thing. So this could be a small improvement in those situations. Then you patch it at home, or just keep running it. 

Bacon strips were always hit and miss, for me. Dynaplug however, that system works great. Bonus points for the applicator threading into the base of a OneUp tool thingy that fits into a pump. This CB plug looks like it'll work a lot like Dynaplugs. 

3
haen
Posts
105
Joined
12/3/2020
Location
CA US
2/17/2026 9:58pm
Scontoni wrote:
Definitely a high-pivot ebike
xl

Definitely a high-pivot ebike

snojunkie wrote:

TQ powered Sight. Should see info on the builds this week. 

Norco Sight QT - 580 Wh battery. Using new front triangle but same rear as the analogue Sight. Second result on google when I searched "TQ Norco Sight" 

12
2/17/2026 11:39pm
bturman wrote:
Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires"...

Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires" rather than "for tubes", although I've had great success with a Park Tool VP-1 and even ShoeGoo in the past. This would be sick for pinch flats though.

boozed wrote:

I've had reasonable success using standard self-vulcanising patches on the inside of tubeless tyres

Best solution I've had is using a thin needle and 40-80lb braided fishing line to stitch it up and then use some sort of flexible adhesive (shoe goo etc) with a patch on the inside of the tire. Managed to seal up a few decently sized snakebites and get another thousand or so km out of some tires.

2
1
Primoz
Posts
4519
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
2/18/2026 12:39am Edited Date/Time 2/18/2026 12:40am

Put a plug in it trailside to get you out of the woods, then Rema TipTop tubeless patches (blue backing instead of red). They are stiffer so they don't stretch like inner tube patches do. 

There are very few tubeless tyres I haven't patched with them in the last 10 years, I punctured almost all of them and very rarely was it so late it made sense to throw out the tyre. On the other hand I patched week old tyres and ran them for most of the season patched.

EDIT: if it's a really big gash and the patch has problems holding it together, I hear dental floss is also a good option to sew it up before patching. 

4
lickmycrinkle
Posts
210
Joined
1/27/2021
Location
Beverly Hills, CA US
2/18/2026 1:48am

WTB were first/earlier with this particular concept. Can confirm, they work great. Dynaplug is still the best though IMO.

Advantage to WTB being you can forgo the suppository and just apply the plug with a 4mm hex. The CB looks fiddly with trying to push the diamond through without it rotating.

WTB TCS Rocket Tubeless Tire Plug Kit (Black) - Performance Bicycle

2
1
2/18/2026 2:25am
Primoz wrote:
Put a plug in it trailside to get you out of the woods, then Rema TipTop tubeless patches (blue backing instead of red). They are stiffer...

Put a plug in it trailside to get you out of the woods, then Rema TipTop tubeless patches (blue backing instead of red). They are stiffer so they don't stretch like inner tube patches do. 

There are very few tubeless tyres I haven't patched with them in the last 10 years, I punctured almost all of them and very rarely was it so late it made sense to throw out the tyre. On the other hand I patched week old tyres and ran them for most of the season patched.

EDIT: if it's a really big gash and the patch has problems holding it together, I hear dental floss is also a good option to sew it up before patching. 

What glue do you use with these tip top blue patches? The usual one or is there a more specific one?

1
alannz
Posts
49
Joined
1/26/2025
Location
California, CA US
2/18/2026 2:31am
Evwan wrote:
I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. I see a few issues: 1. Shimano XTR, XT, and...

I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. 

I see a few issues: 

1. Shimano XTR, XT, and SLX all have the same mechanical and hydraulic power output, but the test results show them as being wildly different. 

2. They also show TRP DHR evo as dramatically underperforming XTR. Having used both, this is just incorrect... 

3. And lastly, XTR being next to Maven in terms of test results in laughable. XTR is a cross country brake compared to maven stopping power. 

Based on the wild discrepancy between mechanically equal shimano stoppers, I assume their test methodology has large error bars that we are not seeing in the data presented by them.

iceman2058 wrote:
Kinda derailing this thread now, but a couple of counter arguments:-XTR, XT, and SLX aren't "wildly" different in the results, there's about 10% decrease in recorded...

Kinda derailing this thread now, but a couple of counter arguments:

-XTR, XT, and SLX aren't "wildly" different in the results, there's about 10% decrease in recorded power between each of them with stock pads (they didn't test XT and SLX with the Sinter pads). Since they used the average of 20 decelerations, I would say there is some underlying (=real) reason for the differences.

-TRP's DH-R EVO always felt a bit low on brake-power-to-finger-power ratio for me, compared to several other brakes...

-remember that they tested with constant power at the lever (4 kg of force on the levers for all the test runs). With the same pads and rotors, I have no problem believing that the XTR can land next to the Maven at a specific, constant lever force. This doesn't mean that the Maven doesn't have more "headroom" to borrow a term from the audio world, but XTRs definitely develop quite a bit of stopping power without too much lever input. You call them "XC" brakes but that's just because they use slightly more exclusive materials to keep the weight in check, as you also pointed out they are based on the same mechanical/hydraulic layout as XT and SLX.

Anyway, this discussion should probably move to a brake thread now.

Evwan wrote:
According to the enduro mag test, XTR is more powerful than Dominion A4 and TRP DHR Evo, and close to the same power as mavens. I don't...

According to the enduro mag test, XTR is more powerful than Dominion A4 and TRP DHR Evo, and close to the same power as mavens. 

I don't think their lab test is an accurate reflection of real world riding, because it's definitely not what I have experienced.

 

100% agree with you and the difference is even more stark on an e-bike having used 2 different sets of XTR 4 piston brakes with new rotors and pads on 2 bikes compared to 1 set of Mavens on a 3rd bike. As a larger rider (250lb kitted + ~50lb e-bike) the XTRs routinely have me worried on long descents and I develop significantly more arm pump compared Mavens. I’ve also never noticed the Maven lever resistance being any issue, but it could be because I’m a larger person, and I don’t doubt many others claiming the lever resistance is too high. I just think body weight and grip strength vary way too much to be able to know if Person A’s experience will match Person B unless everyone lists their rider+bike weight and we all utilize a standardized grip strength measurement of some kind. 

2
Primoz
Posts
4519
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
2/18/2026 2:39am
Primoz wrote:
Put a plug in it trailside to get you out of the woods, then Rema TipTop tubeless patches (blue backing instead of red). They are stiffer...

Put a plug in it trailside to get you out of the woods, then Rema TipTop tubeless patches (blue backing instead of red). They are stiffer so they don't stretch like inner tube patches do. 

There are very few tubeless tyres I haven't patched with them in the last 10 years, I punctured almost all of them and very rarely was it so late it made sense to throw out the tyre. On the other hand I patched week old tyres and ran them for most of the season patched.

EDIT: if it's a really big gash and the patch has problems holding it together, I hear dental floss is also a good option to sew it up before patching. 

freeriding wrote:

What glue do you use with these tip top blue patches? The usual one or is there a more specific one?

SC-BL (special cement blue) from Rema. 

1
FullSend
Posts
183
Joined
7/14/2021
Location
DE
2/18/2026 2:58am Edited Date/Time 2/18/2026 3:00am

There's a bunch of new models on the horizon:

-New Propain Tyee (apparently it's going mid-travel, with 145mm of suspension travel)

-The new Norco is indeed the new Sight VLT (150 mm e-bike, features the TQ-motor)

-New Giant Stance E+ (entry- to mid-level e-bike with 140 mm of travel)

-New, different version of the Specialized Levo, called the Levo 4 R

6
1
FullSend
Posts
183
Joined
7/14/2021
Location
DE
2/18/2026 3:03am
CptObius wrote:
Internationales de chelva: New lapierre proto beneath anne

Internationales de chelva: New lapierre proto beneath anne

From that angle it looks surprisingly similar to a Scott Spark from 2017

1
Primoz
Posts
4519
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
2/18/2026 3:28am Edited Date/Time 2/18/2026 4:15am
Evwan wrote:
I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. I see a few issues: 1. Shimano XTR, XT, and...

I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. 

I see a few issues: 

1. Shimano XTR, XT, and SLX all have the same mechanical and hydraulic power output, but the test results show them as being wildly different. 

2. They also show TRP DHR evo as dramatically underperforming XTR. Having used both, this is just incorrect... 

3. And lastly, XTR being next to Maven in terms of test results in laughable. XTR is a cross country brake compared to maven stopping power. 

Based on the wild discrepancy between mechanically equal shimano stoppers, I assume their test methodology has large error bars that we are not seeing in the data presented by them.

iceman2058 wrote:
Kinda derailing this thread now, but a couple of counter arguments:-XTR, XT, and SLX aren't "wildly" different in the results, there's about 10% decrease in recorded...

Kinda derailing this thread now, but a couple of counter arguments:

-XTR, XT, and SLX aren't "wildly" different in the results, there's about 10% decrease in recorded power between each of them with stock pads (they didn't test XT and SLX with the Sinter pads). Since they used the average of 20 decelerations, I would say there is some underlying (=real) reason for the differences.

-TRP's DH-R EVO always felt a bit low on brake-power-to-finger-power ratio for me, compared to several other brakes...

-remember that they tested with constant power at the lever (4 kg of force on the levers for all the test runs). With the same pads and rotors, I have no problem believing that the XTR can land next to the Maven at a specific, constant lever force. This doesn't mean that the Maven doesn't have more "headroom" to borrow a term from the audio world, but XTRs definitely develop quite a bit of stopping power without too much lever input. You call them "XC" brakes but that's just because they use slightly more exclusive materials to keep the weight in check, as you also pointed out they are based on the same mechanical/hydraulic layout as XT and SLX.

Anyway, this discussion should probably move to a brake thread now.

XTR uses a single piece caliper, XT and SLX don't. Could be a factor in the difference. 

As for the constant finger force and comparing different brakes, I know it adds a lot more testing, but maybe testing at two of maybe even three finger force levels would make sense. Maybe some brakes are not really linear and the 4 kg force isn't enough to really show them for what they are?

EDIT: I see the second part was already mentioned... 

2
2/18/2026 7:54am
bturman wrote:
Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires"...

Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires" rather than "for tubes", although I've had great success with a Park Tool VP-1 and even ShoeGoo in the past. This would be sick for pinch flats though.

Can’t you just use a regular car tire patch?

5
Evil96
Posts
802
Joined
8/21/2014
Location
Portogruaro, VE IT
2/18/2026 9:58am

There’s also a 4 bar Tallboy with updated frame storage 130/140 coming

And the new V7 nomad 170mm, Mullet 

9
1
2/18/2026 10:22am
Evil96 wrote:

There’s also a 4 bar Tallboy with updated frame storage 130/140 coming

And the new V7 nomad 170mm, Mullet 

Any word on timing? I'm curious to see that Tallboy

3
Evil96
Posts
802
Joined
8/21/2014
Location
Portogruaro, VE IT
2/18/2026 10:30am
Evil96 wrote:

There’s also a 4 bar Tallboy with updated frame storage 130/140 coming

And the new V7 nomad 170mm, Mullet 

Any word on timing? I'm curious to see that Tallboy

i've seen a story from a eastern europe Santa cruz dealer with these descriptions asking for preorders

6
1
piratetrails
Posts
281
Joined
8/28/2021
Location
Arcadia, VA US
2/18/2026 10:57am
Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires"...

Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires" rather than "for tubes", although I've had great success with a Park Tool VP-1 and even ShoeGoo in the past. This would be sick for pinch flats though.

Because nobody is going to patch a tubeless tire on the side of the trail. Especially with an insert…

I was talking about patching them in the workshop at home. Enduro casing tires and up being $100+ now I’m going to patch a punctured tire if it still has good tread.

6
piratetrails
Posts
281
Joined
8/28/2021
Location
Arcadia, VA US
2/18/2026 11:01am
bturman wrote:
Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires"...

Why this and not a patch kit? I always found it odd nobody (that I know of) makes a patch kit that's marketed as "for tires" rather than "for tubes", although I've had great success with a Park Tool VP-1 and even ShoeGoo in the past. This would be sick for pinch flats though.

Can’t you just use a regular car tire patch?

You could, but then again you don’t put car Slime in your tires. Its still strange to me there’s so many bike specific options for sealant and plugs but not patches.

2
1

Post a reply to: 2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

The Latest