All

Maybe it's just how the Italians call it? EDIT: it is https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quoziente_d%27intelligenza

not in english though, and for a guy who hangs the american flag in his workshop, one should expect more

Sir, You’ve missed the point.

I was genuinely intrigued and was thinking of buying one of his stems because the BMB ones are so damn expensive, but an advertisement that calls people who disagree "haters and low IQ" immediately kills any chance of sending money his way.

This guy is so far up his own ass that he prob used his bush resizing tool to make stools slide out without any friction

so, after CS length war this turned into 31,8 vs 35 bars discussions… can we please keep it tech RUMORS/INNOVATION in here?! maybe open up a new 31,8 vs 35 thread if such doesn‘t already exist.

This seems like a great topic for a new thread.

Why do you think a flexible bar would ride like trash? Also when you say bars are not close to the ultimate strength and the like, with aluminium you need some safety because cycling it the strength will lower. If you start close to the ultimate limit, the bar will crack through very little use. With carbon it is a bit different, but yeah. I think it might make sense to have a discussion on how much safety you need. The more the better to be sure, but if it adds stiffness that you don't want, there's a middle ground...

Chainstay talk again... This is why we can't have nice things

If you make bars compliant in all directions they feel rather vague. Just try any XC oriented 31.8 bars. Not exactly confidence inspiring

I know, just pointing out additional factors to not consider this as something from the Atherton stable. Going along the lines of asking 'who uses DW4'. Athertons do, but on their machined bikes.

Thats not a trunnion shock so it’s probably 230xwhatever