OK, but... "based on reach": Reach relative to what? Height? Wingspan? And in what relationship? Linear proportion? Something else? "prioritize grip": How? And to what degree? How much of grip is actually a function of fit vs. stance, technique, tire pressure, etc? "adapted to rider size": Again, what part of a rider's size? Arm length? Shoulder width? Torso height? Hand span? And what should that relationship be? Not saying any of these are bad ideas--in fact, I think they're probably good general principles--but for them to be provably better (or worse) than any other system out there, they'd need to...