2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

Related:
1/12/2026 1:53pm

With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's not a high percentage. 

 

It's not when they are on the brakes, or in the woods, or cornering. Or rock gardens.  Or during cross winds.

 

 If a relatively smooth, high speed track with a flat middle section can be won without a chain,  aero's benefits aren't going to be game changing

13
seanfisseli
Posts
562
Joined
4/16/2024
Location
Santa Cruz, CA US
1/12/2026 3:08pm
With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's...

With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's not a high percentage. 

 

It's not when they are on the brakes, or in the woods, or cornering. Or rock gardens.  Or during cross winds.

 

 If a relatively smooth, high speed track with a flat middle section can be won without a chain,  aero's benefits aren't going to be game changing

Have you watched DH races before?

20
Simcik
Posts
426
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
Loma, CO US
1/12/2026 3:15pm Edited Date/Time 1/12/2026 3:17pm
With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's...

With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's not a high percentage. 

 

It's not when they are on the brakes, or in the woods, or cornering. Or rock gardens.  Or during cross winds.

 

 If a relatively smooth, high speed track with a flat middle section can be won without a chain,  aero's benefits aren't going to be game changing

Growing up ski racing, GS/DH speed suits did not make a huge difference at lower speeds. In a slalom where speeds are pretty comparable to DH mountain bike racing, it may make a 0.1-0.3 second difference per minute of racing. Giant slalom has speeds exceeding 50MPH For Super G and DH alpine skiing where speeds exceed 70 MPH, the drag one feels with regular ski gear on would be massive, accounting for up to a few seconds. DH racing just doesn't have the top speeds for prolonged periods of time that it is going to make or break a podium. 

That said, ski racing has settled on everyone races in a GS/DH (GS suit has pads, DH has no pads and tends to be ever so tighter) suit depending upon the application. Mountain biking just needs to set a standard for what DH racers are wearing. To me, aero mtb gear looks out of place, speed suits from the old Worlds days also is not a good look for the sport. 

2
1
rugbyred
Posts
126
Joined
4/29/2012
Location
CA
1/12/2026 4:06pm

Wasn’t there a rule created that banned speed suits and no visors because the riders didn’t like the look? Back in the Peaty, Kovarik, etc days. 

3
mickey
Posts
239
Joined
2/19/2010
Location
Roanoke, VA US
1/12/2026 4:16pm

Rules aren’t innovations.

There are plenty of us who still wriggle into a long sleeve skinsuit for bikepark days just to mess with people. 

 Some of the best training days I ever had were in a skinsuit, chainless.  You can learn a lot about breaking points.

The early aughts “gentleman’s agreement” followed up by the actual uci 2cm pinch rule before Beijing Olympics bmx introduction was stupid and continues to be stupid.

It’s bicycle racing.  Let folks wear bicycle racing clothes.   

4
3
1/12/2026 5:12pm

Have you watched DH races before?

I haven't missed a race since Gee lost the overall to Stevie (until the Lake Placid race). I've attended two world cups in person. 

What percentage of a race is a DH rider tucking? A decent amount on some tracks, but not that much on most tracks. 

1
5
1/12/2026 5:32pm

Tucking isn't the best guide to go by, as there are often sections where you would want to tuck, but can't as you have to pump or absorb bumps etc. 

If you imagine aero farings on a bike, the leogang motorway. Ft bill motorway and the lake placids lower section would all be faster with a more aero setup. 

By how much? Wed have to test

Also the brake covers were made for temp management and keeping the grit out, not for aero, but they may have been repurposed now. 

6
ballz
Posts
474
Joined
7/30/2024
Location
Ouagadougou EH
1/12/2026 5:57pm
Primoz wrote:
My YouTube game is weak these days, so I'm a bit late (the video is 4 months old), but I don't think this has been discussed:The...

My YouTube game is weak these days, so I'm a bit late (the video is 4 months old), but I don't think this has been discussed:

The relevant part begins at 2:24 - aero in DH.

This is off the back of Peak Torque's previous video where he did an analysis on Leadville 100 race (a gravel-ish race where some riders ran full suss XC bikes with drop bars and there was one case of a makeshift fork fairing) and the benefits a fork fairing plus drop bars would give you over a 'stock' XC bike (no fairings and flat bars). For DH, 2025 Leogang was analysed and based on his modelling, adding aero fairings to a Fox 40 Jackson Goldstone, the winner by around 5 hundreds of a second, could gain up to 1,8 seconds due to lower drag and the resulting higher speed.

Obviously this is assuming Jackson COULD run said higher speed, i.e. wouldn't need to brake more, but still. Aero in DH when?

I've said this many times in these forums. DH has not really scratched the surface with aero, and those who do will reap major rewards given...

I've said this many times in these forums. DH has not really scratched the surface with aero, and those who do will reap major rewards given how close times have gotten. I think it is overlooked that (I think it was) Neko who said in an interview that his teammembers had to train in their Speedsuits because it was that much faster than normal kit. Their braking points would get all messed up if they trained all sessions in normal kit, then put on the Speedsuit for race day. 
Jackson is without a doubt one of the most skilled on a bike on the World Cup, however, he's not heavy and doesn't benefit from mass going downhill. There's a good chance he doesn't get a couple of his victories last year if he's a baggy kit. 
The fairings on the front brake rotor will become more common as well because it smooths the air in that area. 
The first rider to not wear a peak on his helmet will benefit as well (unless that's outlawed by UCI?) 
When races are won/lost by <1sec aero is a HUGE factor. 
Anyone who spends time on a road bike will understand aero than your average MTBer. 

Newsflash - rider's weight doesn't impact their downhill acceleration. It's 9.8ms^-02 for everyone.

3
15
dolface
Posts
1666
Joined
10/26/2015
Location
CA US
1/12/2026 6:14pm
With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's...

With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's not a high percentage. 

 

It's not when they are on the brakes, or in the woods, or cornering. Or rock gardens.  Or during cross winds.

 

 If a relatively smooth, high speed track with a flat middle section can be won without a chain,  aero's benefits aren't going to be game changing

Simcik wrote:
Growing up ski racing, GS/DH speed suits did not make a huge difference at lower speeds. In a slalom where speeds are pretty comparable to DH...

Growing up ski racing, GS/DH speed suits did not make a huge difference at lower speeds. In a slalom where speeds are pretty comparable to DH mountain bike racing, it may make a 0.1-0.3 second difference per minute of racing. Giant slalom has speeds exceeding 50MPH For Super G and DH alpine skiing where speeds exceed 70 MPH, the drag one feels with regular ski gear on would be massive, accounting for up to a few seconds. DH racing just doesn't have the top speeds for prolonged periods of time that it is going to make or break a podium. 

That said, ski racing has settled on everyone races in a GS/DH (GS suit has pads, DH has no pads and tends to be ever so tighter) suit depending upon the application. Mountain biking just needs to set a standard for what DH racers are wearing. To me, aero mtb gear looks out of place, speed suits from the old Worlds days also is not a good look for the sport. 

Ben Cathro is on-record that the skinsuits they wore at Ft. Bill ended up delivering ~1 sec/min of race time ; that's a LOT. (And yes, most tracks aren't like Ft. Bill but the point stands).

6
Evwan
Posts
116
Joined
11/18/2025
Location
Sunnyvale, CA US
1/12/2026 9:12pm
With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's...

With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's not a high percentage. 

 

It's not when they are on the brakes, or in the woods, or cornering. Or rock gardens.  Or during cross winds.

 

 If a relatively smooth, high speed track with a flat middle section can be won without a chain,  aero's benefits aren't going to be game changing

This is objectively wrong. 

La Thuille DH track is 1.4 miles, and the winning run was 3' 27", so the average pace was ~24mph. 

13
1
Evwan
Posts
116
Joined
11/18/2025
Location
Sunnyvale, CA US
1/12/2026 9:24pm Edited Date/Time 1/12/2026 9:24pm
Primoz wrote:
My YouTube game is weak these days, so I'm a bit late (the video is 4 months old), but I don't think this has been discussed:The...

My YouTube game is weak these days, so I'm a bit late (the video is 4 months old), but I don't think this has been discussed:

The relevant part begins at 2:24 - aero in DH.

This is off the back of Peak Torque's previous video where he did an analysis on Leadville 100 race (a gravel-ish race where some riders ran full suss XC bikes with drop bars and there was one case of a makeshift fork fairing) and the benefits a fork fairing plus drop bars would give you over a 'stock' XC bike (no fairings and flat bars). For DH, 2025 Leogang was analysed and based on his modelling, adding aero fairings to a Fox 40 Jackson Goldstone, the winner by around 5 hundreds of a second, could gain up to 1,8 seconds due to lower drag and the resulting higher speed.

Obviously this is assuming Jackson COULD run said higher speed, i.e. wouldn't need to brake more, but still. Aero in DH when?

I've said this many times in these forums. DH has not really scratched the surface with aero, and those who do will reap major rewards given...

I've said this many times in these forums. DH has not really scratched the surface with aero, and those who do will reap major rewards given how close times have gotten. I think it is overlooked that (I think it was) Neko who said in an interview that his teammembers had to train in their Speedsuits because it was that much faster than normal kit. Their braking points would get all messed up if they trained all sessions in normal kit, then put on the Speedsuit for race day. 
Jackson is without a doubt one of the most skilled on a bike on the World Cup, however, he's not heavy and doesn't benefit from mass going downhill. There's a good chance he doesn't get a couple of his victories last year if he's a baggy kit. 
The fairings on the front brake rotor will become more common as well because it smooths the air in that area. 
The first rider to not wear a peak on his helmet will benefit as well (unless that's outlawed by UCI?) 
When races are won/lost by <1sec aero is a HUGE factor. 
Anyone who spends time on a road bike will understand aero than your average MTBer. 

ballz wrote:

Newsflash - rider's weight doesn't impact their downhill acceleration. It's 9.8ms^-02 for everyone.

You're forgetting about the existence of air. World cup DH races don't happen in a vacuum chamber. 

Wind resistance is more favorable to a person with a larger mass to surface area ratio (generally speaking, the larger riders). 

Loic Bruni is going to be less affected by wind resistance than Jackson Goldstone. 

To think about it another way, if they both go skydiving, Loic's terminal velocity is going to be much higher than Jackson's. They won't fall at the same rate, because air exists. 

21
sethimus
Posts
876
Joined
9/20/2014
Location
CH
1/12/2026 10:22pm

lots of people demonstrating that they slept through school

24
2
1/12/2026 10:35pm Edited Date/Time 1/12/2026 10:36pm
With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's...

With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's not a high percentage. 

 

It's not when they are on the brakes, or in the woods, or cornering. Or rock gardens.  Or during cross winds.

 

 If a relatively smooth, high speed track with a flat middle section can be won without a chain,  aero's benefits aren't going to be game changing

Evwan wrote:

This is objectively wrong. 

La Thuille DH track is 1.4 miles, and the winning run was 3' 27", so the average pace was ~24mph. 

I know it's not the World Cup, but as people were arguing against aero all I could think about was The Speed Traps at both Hardlines and those big +90ft jumps.

I think the fastest speeds were above 60km/h. That's damn fast on a bike and aero clothes are going to make a difference for sure. Hell, I'm NOT fast and I notice an aero difference when I go from a loose shirt to a tighter shirt between laps on a local xc loop!

Do I think aero clothes are cool? No. I elect to wear pants and tshirts. But am I racing? Also no.

7
Primoz
Posts
4539
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
1/13/2026 12:04am
With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's...

With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's not a high percentage. 

 

It's not when they are on the brakes, or in the woods, or cornering. Or rock gardens.  Or during cross winds.

 

 If a relatively smooth, high speed track with a flat middle section can be won without a chain,  aero's benefits aren't going to be game changing

The video I linked goes over the run, sections the track and covers the average speed in each section. Sorry, it's mostly over 15 mph... And the time difference is, possibly, almost/up to 2 seconds from fork fairings ALONE. Let alone additional aero things like tighter suits, bullet helmets, etc. 

2
1/13/2026 1:40am
With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's...

With all this aero talk,  consider what percentage of a run  the rider is actually trying to accelerate over 15mph (where aero starts to matter). It's not a high percentage. 

 

It's not when they are on the brakes, or in the woods, or cornering. Or rock gardens.  Or during cross winds.

 

 If a relatively smooth, high speed track with a flat middle section can be won without a chain,  aero's benefits aren't going to be game changing

Average speeds on a World Cup track are pretty dang high these days.  And while yes a straight up tuck is relatively rare.  Everywhere there is aero benefits to be had.  2 seconds over a 3-4 minute track is the difference between first and third or fifth and fifth and 20th a lot of weekends.  

4
Brian_Peterson
Posts
1147
Joined
4/26/2011
Location
Canyon Country, CA US
1/13/2026 4:00am Edited Date/Time 1/13/2026 4:00am

It's all about the marginal gains... A tenth here and there adds up..

Fork fearings.. So far, the only place I recall seeing them used is the Leadville 100..  A lot of weird setups were there this year... 

2
Primoz
Posts
4539
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
1/13/2026 4:14am

That's where peak torque got the idea for the analysis. It's all explained in the video. 

2
ahleic09
Posts
76
Joined
7/25/2018
Location
Bend, OR US
1/13/2026 5:31am

A little different from the normal leeks here: 27.5+/29 mullet 

IMG 7734
17
1/13/2026 6:26am

I love cargo/utility bikes, plus bikes, alt bikes, at this point I'm spending more time on those than strictly 'performance' mountain bikes.

 

But that thing should have been left on a hillside in its infancy.

9
1
ballz
Posts
474
Joined
7/30/2024
Location
Ouagadougou EH
1/13/2026 7:04am Edited Date/Time 1/13/2026 7:05am
I've said this many times in these forums. DH has not really scratched the surface with aero, and those who do will reap major rewards given...

I've said this many times in these forums. DH has not really scratched the surface with aero, and those who do will reap major rewards given how close times have gotten. I think it is overlooked that (I think it was) Neko who said in an interview that his teammembers had to train in their Speedsuits because it was that much faster than normal kit. Their braking points would get all messed up if they trained all sessions in normal kit, then put on the Speedsuit for race day. 
Jackson is without a doubt one of the most skilled on a bike on the World Cup, however, he's not heavy and doesn't benefit from mass going downhill. There's a good chance he doesn't get a couple of his victories last year if he's a baggy kit. 
The fairings on the front brake rotor will become more common as well because it smooths the air in that area. 
The first rider to not wear a peak on his helmet will benefit as well (unless that's outlawed by UCI?) 
When races are won/lost by <1sec aero is a HUGE factor. 
Anyone who spends time on a road bike will understand aero than your average MTBer. 

ballz wrote:

Newsflash - rider's weight doesn't impact their downhill acceleration. It's 9.8ms^-02 for everyone.

Evwan wrote:
You're forgetting about the existence of air. World cup DH races don't happen in a vacuum chamber. Wind resistance is more favorable to a person with a...

You're forgetting about the existence of air. World cup DH races don't happen in a vacuum chamber. 

Wind resistance is more favorable to a person with a larger mass to surface area ratio (generally speaking, the larger riders). 

Loic Bruni is going to be less affected by wind resistance than Jackson Goldstone. 

To think about it another way, if they both go skydiving, Loic's terminal velocity is going to be much higher than Jackson's. They won't fall at the same rate, because air exists. 

OK it was a tongue in a cheek answer after I skimmed the post and interpreted it incorrectly, my bad.

That said, I tried to quantify the difference between the terminal velocities of the two athletes, and the back-on-napkin quick calc tells me that the velocities will be only 3-4% different, based on their frontal area approximated from the calculation of their body surface area. I would not call these differences "much higher". Does this really matter given everything else going on in a DH race though?

4
metadave
Posts
1244
Joined
2/15/2016
Location
Revelstoke, BC CA
1/13/2026 8:01am
ahleic09 wrote:
A little different from the normal leeks here: 27.5+/29 mullet 

A little different from the normal leeks here: 27.5+/29 mullet 

IMG 7734

Is that a new Unit X?

3
1
ahleic09
Posts
76
Joined
7/25/2018
Location
Bend, OR US
1/13/2026 8:36am
ahleic09 wrote:
A little different from the normal leeks here: 27.5+/29 mullet 

A little different from the normal leeks here: 27.5+/29 mullet 

IMG 7734
metadave wrote:

Is that a new Unit X?

New Kona Unit Y or Unity 

3
Primoz
Posts
4539
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
1/13/2026 8:53am
ballz wrote:

Newsflash - rider's weight doesn't impact their downhill acceleration. It's 9.8ms^-02 for everyone.

Evwan wrote:
You're forgetting about the existence of air. World cup DH races don't happen in a vacuum chamber. Wind resistance is more favorable to a person with a...

You're forgetting about the existence of air. World cup DH races don't happen in a vacuum chamber. 

Wind resistance is more favorable to a person with a larger mass to surface area ratio (generally speaking, the larger riders). 

Loic Bruni is going to be less affected by wind resistance than Jackson Goldstone. 

To think about it another way, if they both go skydiving, Loic's terminal velocity is going to be much higher than Jackson's. They won't fall at the same rate, because air exists. 

ballz wrote:
OK it was a tongue in a cheek answer after I skimmed the post and interpreted it incorrectly, my bad.That said, I tried to quantify the...

OK it was a tongue in a cheek answer after I skimmed the post and interpreted it incorrectly, my bad.

That said, I tried to quantify the difference between the terminal velocities of the two athletes, and the back-on-napkin quick calc tells me that the velocities will be only 3-4% different, based on their frontal area approximated from the calculation of their body surface area. I would not call these differences "much higher". Does this really matter given everything else going on in a DH race though?

3 percent over 200 seconds is 6 seconds. 

11
Brian_Peterson
Posts
1147
Joined
4/26/2011
Location
Canyon Country, CA US
1/13/2026 8:59am

Six seconds in a DH race at the WC level is huge..

12
1
shadyc
Posts
8
Joined
9/8/2023
Location
Redding, CA US
1/13/2026 9:13am

What’s going on with the specialized chisel evo? Seemed like a good option for affordable xc/light trail ripper, but not really available. Discontinued or something new in the works?

5
1/13/2026 9:21am
ahleic09 wrote:
A little different from the normal leeks here: 27.5+/29 mullet 

A little different from the normal leeks here: 27.5+/29 mullet 

IMG 7734

This looks like a BicyclePubes drawing. 

18
ballz
Posts
474
Joined
7/30/2024
Location
Ouagadougou EH
1/13/2026 9:48am
Evwan wrote:
You're forgetting about the existence of air. World cup DH races don't happen in a vacuum chamber. Wind resistance is more favorable to a person with a...

You're forgetting about the existence of air. World cup DH races don't happen in a vacuum chamber. 

Wind resistance is more favorable to a person with a larger mass to surface area ratio (generally speaking, the larger riders). 

Loic Bruni is going to be less affected by wind resistance than Jackson Goldstone. 

To think about it another way, if they both go skydiving, Loic's terminal velocity is going to be much higher than Jackson's. They won't fall at the same rate, because air exists. 

ballz wrote:
OK it was a tongue in a cheek answer after I skimmed the post and interpreted it incorrectly, my bad.That said, I tried to quantify the...

OK it was a tongue in a cheek answer after I skimmed the post and interpreted it incorrectly, my bad.

That said, I tried to quantify the difference between the terminal velocities of the two athletes, and the back-on-napkin quick calc tells me that the velocities will be only 3-4% different, based on their frontal area approximated from the calculation of their body surface area. I would not call these differences "much higher". Does this really matter given everything else going on in a DH race though?

Primoz wrote:

3 percent over 200 seconds is 6 seconds. 

If they are free falling all the way down at terminal velocity, sure. 

2
yzedf
Posts
241
Joined
1/27/2015
Location
Hebron, CT US
1/13/2026 10:07am

My slow ass was hitting 39.5mph/63kph this past summer on a bum knee. I’m over 6’3” tall and definitely not wearing anything aero. Any GoPro video of mine on a high speed trail looks like I’m crawling in comparison to their speeds on any track with a motorway. 

Aero could be a huge help. I really hope it doesn’t go that way. I can’t imagine many companies outside the bike industry wanting to sponsor teams with guys racing in speed suits. To quote my 6 year old… “why is he riding in pajamas?” 

2
Losifer
Posts
407
Joined
9/12/2017
Location
Sandia Park, NM US
1/13/2026 10:09am
shadyc wrote:
What’s going on with the specialized chisel evo? Seemed like a good option for affordable xc/light trail ripper, but not really available. Discontinued or something new...

What’s going on with the specialized chisel evo? Seemed like a good option for affordable xc/light trail ripper, but not really available. Discontinued or something new in the works?

As far as I can tell, they've been selling well. Specialized may have produced a smaller first couple of runs on them, considering the state of bike sales.

 

3
1/13/2026 10:32am
ballz wrote:
OK it was a tongue in a cheek answer after I skimmed the post and interpreted it incorrectly, my bad.That said, I tried to quantify the...

OK it was a tongue in a cheek answer after I skimmed the post and interpreted it incorrectly, my bad.

That said, I tried to quantify the difference between the terminal velocities of the two athletes, and the back-on-napkin quick calc tells me that the velocities will be only 3-4% different, based on their frontal area approximated from the calculation of their body surface area. I would not call these differences "much higher". Does this really matter given everything else going on in a DH race though?

Do you watch DH racing?? How many podiums have less than a 1% spread in times? 

The times are so close and the speeds are so fast that aero makes a huge difference, much more than what suspension platform you're on. I guarantee you the difference between 4 bar and 6 bar is marginal, but the difference between speed suits, aero helmets and fairings vs standard DH garb is enormous.

Of course what bike company would throw money at a sport where the bike matters less than the aero optimizations you make to the bike + rider? 

7

Post a reply to: 2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

The Latest