Recent Activity

All

Maybe because I'm not in North America, but don't you guys have climbing trails separate for descending trails? It's been the standard in Australia for a long time now, any proper sanctioned zone has uphill downhill trails separate, only traversing trails are multi direction and they generally have great site lines, or tight turns to limit speed for safety.
Am I the only one thinking why SRAM bothered with this release at all? It's only for old frames that don't have a UDH, if you do have a UDH you can use a T-Type mechanical. Why bother release a new AXS non T-Type derailleur? Seems like a huge waste of time no? Just continue making the old one until...

casey79 Liked a reply to forum topic The Bikeconomics (Mega)Thread

4/5/2026 5:08am
Arc’teryx is in a very different position to most brands entering MTB, and the current numbers make it clear why they can afford to treat it as a fringe category without pressure. They sit inside the Technical Apparel segment of Amer Sports, which also owns Salomon, Wilson Sporting Goods and Atomic. That group context matters because it brings scale, shared sourcing, and a long track record of operating across multiple technical categories. Looking at FY25, the business is moving fast. Total revenue hit $6.57B, up 27%. Technical Apparel alone grew 30% to $2.86B, with 19% omni-comp growth. That tells you...
This forum topic has 4643 replies.

SteveClimber Added a reply to The Bikeconomics (Mega)Thread

4/4/2026 2:11pm
Thanks for the insights. It shows why the brands with capital now all have their own stores, I e Arc, Patagonia, North Face etc. When operating at such low margins it's best to expand vertically to capture all markups on the product if you have the capability to fund stores.

JVP Liked a reply to forum topic The Bikeconomics (Mega)Thread

4/4/2026 2:08pm
One challenge with low volume apparel is amortizing the development cost. Soft goods sometimes cost more to develop than hard goods as it's a ton of labor making patterns, sewing up samples, testing, reworking the protos, repeat this several times, then have the factory make a few pre-production samples to make sure they interpreted your tech pack correctly. You also need to validate for durability (all brands do this, right? RIGHT?). It's as much voodoo as it is hard science, which means lots of back and forth. Yes, we give them CAD files for patterns, but it's still all hand...
This forum topic has 4643 replies.

Onawalk Liked a reply to forum topic 2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

4/4/2026 2:03pm
@sethimus @Evil96 @CascadeComponents I love, like love-love, that someone with an engineering background (and seemingly a degree) and a wealth of manufacturing experience provided factual mathematical evidence, and it has been refuted by "I believe the manufacturer of this shiny new thing I bought", like conformation bias doesnt exist or something.... There's a quote about facts and opinions that I'm trying to remember here...... it'll come to me....
This forum topic has 3456 replies.

SteveClimber Added a reply to The Bikeconomics (Mega)Thread

4/3/2026 12:16pm
I've always viewed the niche offerings by these premium brands as essential marketing to continue selling the jackets to normal people that make up 80% of their revenue. North Face still manufacture elite level gear for Antarctica (it's what my friend wears when he's deployed on the RSVP Nuyina) but it's brand awareness so they can sell thousands of jackets...

SteveClimber Added a reply to DT Swiss DEG DF

3/27/2026 1:40pm
Assuming it's a high pivot idler setup, you won't see a massive difference as the idler mitigates a lot of the pedal kickback already. If it is without an idler you'll see a big improvement as it will negate the very high pedal kickback high pivot bikes have. One thing to consider is that on certain bikes the pedal kickback...

Mat_Slow_Rider Liked a reply to forum topic 2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

3/27/2026 1:34pm
Unfortunately I'm an idiot, so I'll answer your question even if it is sarcastic. I found a known value that's easy to measure, the rear brake rotor. I set it to 203mm (as mentioned in a bike check from my memory) 16.2cm = 6.377 inch, rounded up however the app used rounds things and also not a perfect angle. Closest match for phone size would be a Iphone 16/17 pro max at 16.3 cm or a google pixel 9/10 at 6.3 inches. I'm going to go with the iphone 16/17 pro max. I should touch grass. I'm also either going...
This forum topic has 3456 replies.
Higher pressure puts more load on the seals, which in turn adds friction. It also pushes on the area of the shaft so with a large shaft and/or high pressure you effectively add extra preload. The difference between a low pressure, small shaft system and something with a higher spring force would be over 10kg at the shock so if you can safely reduce that its worthwhile. As for the IFP itself, a larger diameter needs to travel less for an equivalent shaft displacement compared to a smaller IFP so it can respond much quicker as well.
This forum topic has 473 replies.
Can any math/suspension nerds answer this for me please Does higher IFP pressure in the piggyback reservoir decrease sensitivity (increasing brake away friction) or is it largely fixed by damper design (i.e how much pressure is generated on the oil side of the IFP) and the friction/area of the seal. Obviously there is a trade off, you could have a...
Yeah by tube thickness I meant layup for carbon bikes. We know the smaller frames are lighter, so they aren't just using the same layup and having increased overlap etc. But is it intentionally designed with more flex giving it's a smaller triangle, and most likely will be ridden by lighter riders.