MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation

Related:
Evil96
Posts
804
Joined
8/21/2014
Location
Portogruaro, VE IT
4/23/2024 3:55am

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

7
3
4/23/2024 4:20am
Evil96 wrote:
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/ interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and...

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

shame they didn't include saints

6
5
acambo
Posts
19
Joined
4/9/2021
Location
AU
4/23/2024 4:54am
Evil96 wrote:
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/ interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and...

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

8
jonkranked
Posts
1185
Joined
5/5/2016
Location
Norristown, PA US
4/23/2024 5:01am
Evil96 wrote:
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/ interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and...

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

shame they didn't include saints

for how old the current saint models are now that may have been considered elder abuse

19
4/23/2024 5:10am
jonkranked wrote:

for how old the current saint models are now that may have been considered elder abuse

and given how they excluded those, an update might be already in the review process (hopefully)

jonkranked
Posts
1185
Joined
5/5/2016
Location
Norristown, PA US
4/23/2024 5:10am
Evil96 wrote:
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/ interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and...

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

i'm certainly curious as to how the various metrics were factored and weighted in the final assessment. 

 

one feature only the dominion's have is the alignment set screws on the calipers ("crosshair"). for how long these brakes have been on the market i'm astonished that nobody has copied it yet. 

12
DServy
Posts
233
Joined
5/28/2015
Location
Jackson, WY US
4/23/2024 5:57am
Evil96 wrote:
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/ interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and...

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of makes me wonder why they did what they did. 

For instance, on their chart showing brake performance they decided to use sinter/metallic pads for all the brakes except for the Mavens and TRP. The fact that the Mavens were as powerful as they were with organic pads leads me to believe that they actually might be the strongest brake out there on the market currently.  Not to derail this thread on another brake discussion, but figured I'd point it out.

18
2
4/23/2024 6:11am
ahleic09 wrote:
New Troy ?

New Troy ?

Personally, I think the current troy is one of the most underrated bikes out there right now. Devinci is one of the brands I worry anyone the current industry climate, just because they seem to have a fairly limited reach.

2
4/23/2024 6:16am
junkbox wrote:
Ah yes, the Michelin DerKaiserH16.. 

Ah yes, the Michelin DerKaiserH16.. Grinning

This tire is from a design that is probably older than you. Before the DHF was even a thing, a lot of us in here ran...

This tire is from a design that is probably older than you. Before the DHF was even a thing, a lot of us in here ran this tire and it was awesome. Except for when the side lugs used to tear super easy, but hopefully they fixed that.

 

Nico_Hrndz wrote:

Wasn't it stock on V1 Big Hits? 

(This bike... 26/24 mullet and w/ the bigger linkage, up to 3' tires -damn I need to get one)

I would love a modern big hit, something fully dedicated to riding like an idiot on trails vs. being a dedicated park bike. The OG Bighit comp is one of the bikes that got away, for me.

2
Shinook
Posts
141
Joined
12/29/2015
Location
Asheville, NC US
4/23/2024 6:23am Edited Date/Time 4/23/2024 6:25am
acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

I've had almost all of them with ride time and the Trickstuff has a lot of similarities with Hope, the quality is just slightly more refined and better, but not by much. They also ditch DOT, which I know some people care more about than others, although it's a big issue in the US where Bionol is nearly impossible to find. I tripped over my bottle and nearly lost half of it, which made for a rough moment and a few bad words. I also feel at the price point they should include bleed tools, Intend does and IMO there is no reason you should pay that much for a boutique brand of brakes that uses a hard to find fluid and bleed kit and it not be included.

I prefer the Hope clamp mechanism, the Maxima clamp is really secure but kindof fiddly. Trickstuff offers more detailed instructions on how to use their braided hoses, Hope sells the kit but 0 instructions on how to install it. The Trickstuff brakes are a little more intuitive feeling at first, but it's really marginal. The Hope adjusters are easier to use and don't get in the way, the Trickstuff reach adjuster can kindof get in the way of grips or controls at times. The Hope lever body sits pretty far in on the bar, which might irritate some and make for a slightly messier cockpit. The Maximas allow for easier hose alignment, whereas Hope it's real easy to end up with a twisted hose during install. It's all nitpicky and they are both great, but it's hard to justify the Maximas at the price point, regardless of how good they are, they are only marginally better than the T4 V4s IMO.

IMO where these won't work for some is riders who want a more defined bite point when the pads engage. Both of these you can keep pulling right on past the engagement point and it'll feel less force is required to reach power than most other brakes, it's not super intuitive. You have to learn to feel the brakes instead of the lever, if that makes sense. I got used to it, but found that brakes with a more defined bite point worked better for me (Dominions, Intend, Maven, etc), I think riders moving from SRAM or Shimano will have an easier time adjusting to Dominions than they would Hope or Trickstuff due to this. That's not a knock on them, just that you have to spend some time adjusting to the lever feel and some won't want to do that.

14
junkbox
Posts
8
Joined
3/19/2024
Location
Mt. Aetna, MD US
4/23/2024 6:43am
1llumA wrote:

Looks like the Michelin DH16 is finally available with some update to the DH22 casing and compound.

https://bikerumor.com/2024-michelin-mtb-tires/

junkbox wrote:
Ah yes, the Michelin DerKaiserH16.. 

Ah yes, the Michelin DerKaiserH16.. Grinning

Looks nothing like a kaiser

"nothing" is a stretch, but my eyes might be calibrated differently. Should be a great tire, regardless.

4
acambo
Posts
19
Joined
4/9/2021
Location
AU
4/23/2024 6:45am
Evil96 wrote:
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/ interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and...

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

DServy wrote:
I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of...

I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of makes me wonder why they did what they did. 

For instance, on their chart showing brake performance they decided to use sinter/metallic pads for all the brakes except for the Mavens and TRP. The fact that the Mavens were as powerful as they were with organic pads leads me to believe that they actually might be the strongest brake out there on the market currently.  Not to derail this thread on another brake discussion, but figured I'd point it out.

Metallic pads aren't inherently more powerful than organic pads and quite often its the opposite. Metallic pads might work better in the wet and are more durable but organic pads like Galfer greens, Sinter greens and Trickstuff power+ are more powerful. Especially in lab conditions.

8
bizutch
Posts
1435
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
Fletcher, NC US
4/23/2024 6:55am
lloyd506 wrote:
Weird kona rant, I had a medium process 29 153 and had no issues with bottles fitting. Wife has a small 27.5 process 153 and can...

Weird kona rant, I had a medium process 29 153 and had no issues with bottles fitting. Wife has a small 27.5 process 153 and can fit a small bottle no problem. 

You must not have an external reservoir on your shock. 
Mine's the 27.5 medium, but it's the same issue on the 29er from what I saw in store.

I can barely get a 450ml Fidlock in.
image-20240423095507-1

lloyd506
Posts
252
Joined
7/10/2016
Location
CA
4/23/2024 7:22am
lloyd506 wrote:
Weird kona rant, I had a medium process 29 153 and had no issues with bottles fitting. Wife has a small 27.5 process 153 and can...

Weird kona rant, I had a medium process 29 153 and had no issues with bottles fitting. Wife has a small 27.5 process 153 and can fit a small bottle no problem. 

bizutch wrote:
You must not have an external reservoir on your shock.  Mine's the 27.5 medium, but it's the same issue on the 29er from what I saw...

You must not have an external reservoir on your shock. 
Mine's the 27.5 medium, but it's the same issue on the 29er from what I saw in store.

I can barely get a 450ml Fidlock in.
image-20240423095507-1

Both were carbon frames and had the piggy back. Could have had more clearance? 

1
4/23/2024 7:31am
junkbox wrote:
Ah yes, the Michelin DerKaiserH16.. 

Ah yes, the Michelin DerKaiserH16.. Grinning

Looks nothing like a kaiser

junkbox wrote:
"nothing" is a stretch, but my eyes might be calibrated differently. Should be a great tire, regardless.

"nothing" is a stretch, but my eyes might be calibrated differently. Should be a great tire, regardless.

Side knobs totally different.  Center pattern is different.  Sure both have “ramped” knobs for less rolling resistance but ultimately they are going to ride quite different.  In a world where treads are often directly copied I wouldn’t say this is an offender.

1
4/23/2024 7:40am
acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

Shinook wrote:
I've had almost all of them with ride time and the Trickstuff has a lot of similarities with Hope, the quality is just slightly more refined...

I've had almost all of them with ride time and the Trickstuff has a lot of similarities with Hope, the quality is just slightly more refined and better, but not by much. They also ditch DOT, which I know some people care more about than others, although it's a big issue in the US where Bionol is nearly impossible to find. I tripped over my bottle and nearly lost half of it, which made for a rough moment and a few bad words. I also feel at the price point they should include bleed tools, Intend does and IMO there is no reason you should pay that much for a boutique brand of brakes that uses a hard to find fluid and bleed kit and it not be included.

I prefer the Hope clamp mechanism, the Maxima clamp is really secure but kindof fiddly. Trickstuff offers more detailed instructions on how to use their braided hoses, Hope sells the kit but 0 instructions on how to install it. The Trickstuff brakes are a little more intuitive feeling at first, but it's really marginal. The Hope adjusters are easier to use and don't get in the way, the Trickstuff reach adjuster can kindof get in the way of grips or controls at times. The Hope lever body sits pretty far in on the bar, which might irritate some and make for a slightly messier cockpit. The Maximas allow for easier hose alignment, whereas Hope it's real easy to end up with a twisted hose during install. It's all nitpicky and they are both great, but it's hard to justify the Maximas at the price point, regardless of how good they are, they are only marginally better than the T4 V4s IMO.

IMO where these won't work for some is riders who want a more defined bite point when the pads engage. Both of these you can keep pulling right on past the engagement point and it'll feel less force is required to reach power than most other brakes, it's not super intuitive. You have to learn to feel the brakes instead of the lever, if that makes sense. I got used to it, but found that brakes with a more defined bite point worked better for me (Dominions, Intend, Maven, etc), I think riders moving from SRAM or Shimano will have an easier time adjusting to Dominions than they would Hope or Trickstuff due to this. That's not a knock on them, just that you have to spend some time adjusting to the lever feel and some won't want to do that.

Appreciate your take. I have two sets of V4 brakes and your nitpick points 100% align with my experience. Considering the Intends for the next build, just because. Now back to the rumors!

4
4/23/2024 9:19am
acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

DServy wrote:
I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of...

I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of makes me wonder why they did what they did. 

For instance, on their chart showing brake performance they decided to use sinter/metallic pads for all the brakes except for the Mavens and TRP. The fact that the Mavens were as powerful as they were with organic pads leads me to believe that they actually might be the strongest brake out there on the market currently.  Not to derail this thread on another brake discussion, but figured I'd point it out.

acambo wrote:
Metallic pads aren't inherently more powerful than organic pads and quite often its the opposite. Metallic pads might work better in the wet and are more...

Metallic pads aren't inherently more powerful than organic pads and quite often its the opposite. Metallic pads might work better in the wet and are more durable but organic pads like Galfer greens, Sinter greens and Trickstuff power+ are more powerful. Especially in lab conditions.

Huh? Did you even look at the lab test?

Trickstuff Sinter Green beat Power +

XTR, Hayes, Hope, Cura 4, MT7 - the metallic pads all performed better in the lab than organic pads. 

I'd say you've got it backwards, because of the heat involved in this lab test, metallic pads will perform better. In the real world where developing brake temperature can be an issue on certain trails organics can have an edge. But in a lab setting it's metallic pads all day. 

2
5
gbcoke
Posts
102
Joined
1/6/2016
Location
US
4/23/2024 9:31am

The lab results are strange to me as I've been using Maven's since they came out and can say without a doubt (for me) they are the most powerful brakes I have tried and I tried most of them (e4,v4,saint,Maxima,cura4,mt7...).

Also,when set up correctly they are just rock solid.Most other brakes I've used were not consistent at all and needed too much attention (Saint not included).I have always liked Sram's ergonomics and it's one of the only brakes with a contact adjustment that actually works.

Only thing that remains to be seen is the durability over a longer period...

*My bike is a 54lbs ebike

 

4
Shinook
Posts
141
Joined
12/29/2015
Location
Asheville, NC US
4/23/2024 9:50am Edited Date/Time 4/23/2024 9:50am
gbcoke wrote:
The lab results are strange to me as I've been using Maven's since they came out and can say without a doubt (for me) they are...

The lab results are strange to me as I've been using Maven's since they came out and can say without a doubt (for me) they are the most powerful brakes I have tried and I tried most of them (e4,v4,saint,Maxima,cura4,mt7...).

Also,when set up correctly they are just rock solid.Most other brakes I've used were not consistent at all and needed too much attention (Saint not included).I have always liked Sram's ergonomics and it's one of the only brakes with a contact adjustment that actually works.

Only thing that remains to be seen is the durability over a longer period...

*My bike is a 54lbs ebike

 

I think there is a difference between maximum, overall power a brake puts in and when that power comes on. Most riders will likely never experience or leverage a brakes full power. Using a theoretical example, if you have a lever that takes 8 inches of lever pull to get max power, that power is going to be less realized by most than a lever that takes 3 inches of stroke to reach max power. Meanwhile, some may require more force at the lever to put power down, others less. This is why some brakes may dyno really powerful, but not feel it at the lever.

The Mavens feel more powerful because that power comes on at an earlier phase in the lever stroke and much faster. The Maximas can put the same power down, but it comes on more linearly and requires more lever stroke to obtain. The T4 V4s are kinda in between. It takes more lever pull to obtain the same power, albeit with less force required at the lever. This may be why the Maximas measured higher by Enduro, they were measuring at a constant force, I'd venture if you took force out and instead focused on lever distance, the Mavens would have dynoed higher than others. 

I don't have objective measurements obviously, but based on feel, the Mavens put more power down faster than these others do. That power may not max out as high, but you reach it sooner and that's why I think you feel they have more power. I would agree that having had most of these, they feel more powerful, but max power and power from lever feel are two different things.

IMO they did a great job with the feel of the brakes, but the form factor leaves a lot to be desired, both aesthetically and functionally. 

3
danimaniac
Posts
1
Joined
4/23/2024
Location
Sexau DE
4/23/2024 11:05am
DServy wrote:
I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of...

I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of makes me wonder why they did what they did. 

For instance, on their chart showing brake performance they decided to use sinter/metallic pads for all the brakes except for the Mavens and TRP. The fact that the Mavens were as powerful as they were with organic pads leads me to believe that they actually might be the strongest brake out there on the market currently.  Not to derail this thread on another brake discussion, but figured I'd point it out.

The Sinter Pads are actually organic but from the company named sinter whose lab they used. 

The pads are simply not available for the Mavens and the TRP... at least that's what the test says.

7
1
ahleic09
Posts
77
Joined
7/25/2018
Location
Bend, OR US
4/23/2024 11:13am
ahleic09 wrote:
New Troy ?

New Troy ?

Personally, I think the current troy is one of the most underrated bikes out there right now. Devinci is one of the brands I worry anyone...

Personally, I think the current troy is one of the most underrated bikes out there right now. Devinci is one of the brands I worry anyone the current industry climate, just because they seem to have a fairly limited reach.

Ugh kinda looks like another e bike 

3
3
jonkranked
Posts
1185
Joined
5/5/2016
Location
Norristown, PA US
4/23/2024 11:36am
Evil96 wrote:
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/ interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and...

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

DServy wrote:
I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of...

I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of makes me wonder why they did what they did. 

For instance, on their chart showing brake performance they decided to use sinter/metallic pads for all the brakes except for the Mavens and TRP. The fact that the Mavens were as powerful as they were with organic pads leads me to believe that they actually might be the strongest brake out there on the market currently.  Not to derail this thread on another brake discussion, but figured I'd point it out.

one way they could improve their test methodology is by isolating more variables; use a consistent brake pad compound and rotor.  Maybe something from galfer (just an example) since not all the calipers can fit identical pads, but the same pad compound on the same rotor would keep that aspect of the test consistent. same hub too.   (note - this would be for the lab portion of the test done in a fixture).

2
4/23/2024 12:14pm
acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

DServy wrote:
I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of...

I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of makes me wonder why they did what they did. 

For instance, on their chart showing brake performance they decided to use sinter/metallic pads for all the brakes except for the Mavens and TRP. The fact that the Mavens were as powerful as they were with organic pads leads me to believe that they actually might be the strongest brake out there on the market currently.  Not to derail this thread on another brake discussion, but figured I'd point it out.

jonkranked wrote:
one way they could improve their test methodology is by isolating more variables; use a consistent brake pad compound and rotor.  Maybe something from galfer (just...

one way they could improve their test methodology is by isolating more variables; use a consistent brake pad compound and rotor.  Maybe something from galfer (just an example) since not all the calipers can fit identical pads, but the same pad compound on the same rotor would keep that aspect of the test consistent. same hub too.   (note - this would be for the lab portion of the test done in a fixture).

What's the point of that? We're not after a caliper test, the pads and rotors that come with it is much relevant as most people buy brakes as a system first. 

I do think a rotor test with 1-2 calipers would be good. And potentially a pad test. 

But they were doing a brake test, we buy brakes as a system 

8
1
sethimus
Posts
879
Joined
9/20/2014
Location
CH
4/23/2024 12:29pm Edited Date/Time 4/23/2024 12:30pm
Evil96 wrote:
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/ interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and...

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

DServy wrote:
I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of...

I love Enduro MTB's tests. Having real data to their opinions is always helpful. However, the always do something odd in the testing that kind of makes me wonder why they did what they did. 

For instance, on their chart showing brake performance they decided to use sinter/metallic pads for all the brakes except for the Mavens and TRP. The fact that the Mavens were as powerful as they were with organic pads leads me to believe that they actually might be the strongest brake out there on the market currently.  Not to derail this thread on another brake discussion, but figured I'd point it out.

reading comprehension fail. they used organic pads, from slovenian aftermaket company named SINTER. maven pads were probably not available yet because unique new size

2
Evil96
Posts
804
Joined
8/21/2014
Location
Portogruaro, VE IT
4/23/2024 1:12pm
Evil96 wrote:
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/ interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and...

https://enduro-mtb.com/en/best-mtb-disc-brake-can-buy/

interesting brake test, still cannot understand how the "battle" for the best brake was between the Dominions and the mavens and not between trickstuffs and hopes, hopes do everything better than the mavens, stop you quicker, better lever feel, easier to bleed, cheaper to buy, way better looking, even lighter, don't really know, regardless, interesting test backed up by dyno data

acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

just by touching the lever on hopes it feels quite square and sharp my only concern, and i'll close the offtopic here

acambo
Posts
19
Joined
4/9/2021
Location
AU
4/23/2024 1:21pm
Huh? Did you even look at the lab test? Trickstuff Sinter Green beat Power + XTR, Hayes, Hope, Cura 4, MT7 - the metallic pads all...

Huh? Did you even look at the lab test?

Trickstuff Sinter Green beat Power +

XTR, Hayes, Hope, Cura 4, MT7 - the metallic pads all performed better in the lab than organic pads. 

I'd say you've got it backwards, because of the heat involved in this lab test, metallic pads will perform better. In the real world where developing brake temperature can be an issue on certain trails organics can have an edge. But in a lab setting it's metallic pads all day. 

Huh? did you even read any of the articles? 

The Sinter green pads are organic, just like the hope green pads which where the two best performing pads on test. I only brought up the trickstuff power+ pads as they where the recommended pad upgrade in the 2018 test but I am quite surprised to see them do so poorly in comparison this year. 

It sounds like the organic brake pads used on the Maven where the pads that they came with as this is the non limited edition ultimates. Blame Sram for creating a new pad design for no performance benefit.

gbcoke
Posts
102
Joined
1/6/2016
Location
US
4/23/2024 1:40pm
Huh? Did you even look at the lab test? Trickstuff Sinter Green beat Power + XTR, Hayes, Hope, Cura 4, MT7 - the metallic pads all...

Huh? Did you even look at the lab test?

Trickstuff Sinter Green beat Power +

XTR, Hayes, Hope, Cura 4, MT7 - the metallic pads all performed better in the lab than organic pads. 

I'd say you've got it backwards, because of the heat involved in this lab test, metallic pads will perform better. In the real world where developing brake temperature can be an issue on certain trails organics can have an edge. But in a lab setting it's metallic pads all day. 

acambo wrote:
Huh? did you even read any of the articles?  The Sinter green pads are organic, just like the hope green pads which where the two best...

Huh? did you even read any of the articles? 

The Sinter green pads are organic, just like the hope green pads which where the two best performing pads on test. I only brought up the trickstuff power+ pads as they where the recommended pad upgrade in the 2018 test but I am quite surprised to see them do so poorly in comparison this year. 

It sounds like the organic brake pads used on the Maven where the pads that they came with as this is the non limited edition ultimates. Blame Sram for creating a new pad design for no performance benefit.

No performance benefit on 1 lab test conducted by 1 magaznie.

In real world the Maven's are just super powerful.One "proof" that comes to mind is number of reviewers stating you can "rotor down" on them,which I think is a good indication for their power.It's not something I remember seeing in most brake reviews.

2
1
Robstyle
Posts
86
Joined
1/2/2023
Location
Invercargill NZ
4/23/2024 1:47pm
acambo wrote:
Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I...

Its clear the Hopes are the winner on power and deceleration times. Trickstuff's where the best in some of the tests but for their price I was expecting them to be significantly more powerful. Having gotten my greasy fingers on all the brakes in test except the Trickstuffs, nothing comes close to the Hopes for build quality and the complete lack of play/slop in the lever.

It seems like they have based the results on lever feel and ergonomics which unlike power are quite subjective. I have two sets of Tech 4 V4's and love them but the softer lever feel certainly took some getting too. Some friends have tried them and liked them others didn't. They also seem to have been deducted points due to running on DOT fluid instead of the completely safe and lickable  mineral oil. 

Overall a good test and having dyno numbers to reference back too is a great resource. 

Shinook wrote:
I've had almost all of them with ride time and the Trickstuff has a lot of similarities with Hope, the quality is just slightly more refined...

I've had almost all of them with ride time and the Trickstuff has a lot of similarities with Hope, the quality is just slightly more refined and better, but not by much. They also ditch DOT, which I know some people care more about than others, although it's a big issue in the US where Bionol is nearly impossible to find. I tripped over my bottle and nearly lost half of it, which made for a rough moment and a few bad words. I also feel at the price point they should include bleed tools, Intend does and IMO there is no reason you should pay that much for a boutique brand of brakes that uses a hard to find fluid and bleed kit and it not be included.

I prefer the Hope clamp mechanism, the Maxima clamp is really secure but kindof fiddly. Trickstuff offers more detailed instructions on how to use their braided hoses, Hope sells the kit but 0 instructions on how to install it. The Trickstuff brakes are a little more intuitive feeling at first, but it's really marginal. The Hope adjusters are easier to use and don't get in the way, the Trickstuff reach adjuster can kindof get in the way of grips or controls at times. The Hope lever body sits pretty far in on the bar, which might irritate some and make for a slightly messier cockpit. The Maximas allow for easier hose alignment, whereas Hope it's real easy to end up with a twisted hose during install. It's all nitpicky and they are both great, but it's hard to justify the Maximas at the price point, regardless of how good they are, they are only marginally better than the T4 V4s IMO.

IMO where these won't work for some is riders who want a more defined bite point when the pads engage. Both of these you can keep pulling right on past the engagement point and it'll feel less force is required to reach power than most other brakes, it's not super intuitive. You have to learn to feel the brakes instead of the lever, if that makes sense. I got used to it, but found that brakes with a more defined bite point worked better for me (Dominions, Intend, Maven, etc), I think riders moving from SRAM or Shimano will have an easier time adjusting to Dominions than they would Hope or Trickstuff due to this. That's not a knock on them, just that you have to spend some time adjusting to the lever feel and some won't want to do that.

Re: bionol, I just use putoline hpx instead. Seems to do the business.

Maxima bite point should feel super defined, otherwise it's not bled correctly. But yah, beyond bite they don't feel as defined as a dominion for example. 

Does anyone else think a graph of lever force vs brake torque generated would've been nice to know? 

6
monarchmason
Posts
288
Joined
5/24/2022
Location
Nevada City, CA US
4/23/2024 1:54pm

Is there a brake forum? This is a weekly occurrence at this point. 

36
Post a reply to: MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation

This forum thread has been locked.

The Latest