Suspension Component Technology/Functionality Discussion

3/22/2026 4:47pm

I aired it up to 190 and back in business! 

5
3/25/2026 12:57pm
Pappas717 wrote:
Hey all, Tried to post the in the other thred..And I guess as a dealer I would have to give it a week or so for...

Hey all, Tried to post the in the other thred..And I guess as a dealer I would have to give it a week or so for all FOX employees to catch up. But I have the all gold fox 40, Witch I believe is the 2025. Damper adjustment say X2. Does that mean I can drop in the new glidecore airshaft, And if I want new dampner??

Yes the air spring and damper are backwards compatible.

1
3/25/2026 8:54pm

Random question; is there an agreed upon term to describe the the newer air shocks we see on the market. Stuff like the ohlins ttx2, vivid air, X2? They all have a similar look/design to them, there has got to be a name for that style right? 

rgard
Posts
35
Joined
5/2/2024
Location
pemberton, BC CA
3/26/2026 10:52am Edited Date/Time 3/26/2026 10:52am
MoldyMTB wrote:
Random question; is there an agreed upon term to describe the the newer air shocks we see on the market. Stuff like the ohlins ttx2, vivid...

Random question; is there an agreed upon term to describe the the newer air shocks we see on the market. Stuff like the ohlins ttx2, vivid air, X2? They all have a similar look/design to them, there has got to be a name for that style right? 

I would say these are all large-volume air shocks. An extra sleeve on the outside of the air can allowing a much larger negative spring volume being the visual cue that ties them all together. Vivid is a monotube damper, Ohlins is a twin tube, X2 has been both. 

Primoz
Posts
4606
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
3/27/2026 6:31am Edited Date/Time 3/27/2026 6:33am

The catch is it's an inverse architecture to regular air shocks when it comes to damper body and reservoir location and how the oil flows. But regular air shocks are the reverse of coil shocks anyway, so... Yeah 😂

Air-over-damper? (from the automotive term coil over damper) Reverse air shocks? 

The reason why they exist is that you get the most performance, but servicing them is a pain compared to a regular shock. That's why they are reserved for the upper performance echelons. I guess you could make a regular air shock a twin tube if you wanted, the difference is just in where the air spring lives and subsequently the layout of the reservoir vs. damper body. 

1
3/29/2026 6:23pm

I aired it up to 190 and back in business! 

Forgot to update the forum, the piggyback leaks and doesn't quite last a single ride before deflating back to 50 psi....

1
Slavid666
Posts
136
Joined
5/3/2024
Location
Santa Rosa, CA US
3/29/2026 7:30pm

I aired it up to 190 and back in business! 

Forgot to update the forum, the piggyback leaks and doesn't quite last a single ride before deflating back to 50 psi....

A rebuild will take care of that. Replace the bladder as well as the all the rest of the seals. If I remember correctly the kit plus the bladder was under $50 from DVO… it’s easy to do at home if you’ve worked on a rear shock before. Even if you haven’t it’s not that much work to do it.

3
comatosegi
Posts
80
Joined
8/28/2025
Location
Portland, OR US
3/31/2026 1:01am
Pappas717 wrote:
Hey all, Tried to post the in the other thred..And I guess as a dealer I would have to give it a week or so for...

Hey all, Tried to post the in the other thred..And I guess as a dealer I would have to give it a week or so for all FOX employees to catch up. But I have the all gold fox 40, Witch I believe is the 2025. Damper adjustment say X2. Does that mean I can drop in the new glidecore airshaft, And if I want new dampner??

FoxFactory wrote:
Adding here for the folks not in the other discussion, yes, for 40 the Glidecore air spring and new Grip X2 damper are compatible with MY25...

Adding here for the folks not in the other discussion, yes, for 40 the Glidecore air spring and new Grip X2 damper are compatible with MY25 and MY26 forks. Apologies for missing this question here.

Any idea of timeline for NA stock of the parts?

1
sspomer
Posts
6203
Joined
6/26/2009
Location
Boise, ID US
Fantasy
4/14/2026 8:59am

FOX Float X2 Live Valve Neo information below

FOX Float X2 Live Valve Neo - Own Gravity - Own Traction
FOX Factory is proud to introduce the most advanced gravity shock on the market - the Float X2 Live Valve Neo

Floatx2Neo

FOX Factory is redefining gravity suspension once again with the introduction of the FLOAT X2 Live Valve Neo—a groundbreaking combination of the most advanced air shock in mountain biking and the fastest electronic MTB suspension system ever developed.

Bringing together the unmatched tunability and performance of FLOAT X2 with the real-time responsiveness of Live Valve Neo, this new platform delivers a level of traction, control, and speed that has never before been possible.

The Perfect Setting—In Every Moment

Trail conditions change constantly. Rider inputs change instantly. The FLOAT X2 Live Valve Neo adapts just as fast. At the core of the system is Live Valve Neo, which reads terrain and rider inputs 400 times per second, automatically opening or firming the shock’s compression circuit in as little as 1/70th of a second. The result is suspension that is:

- Firm when efficiency matters 
- Plush when traction is critical  
- Optimized at every moment on the trail

Unlike other electronic systems, Live Valve Neo is fast enough to confidently default to a firmer setting—without interrupting ride feel. This ability has already proven itself at the highest levels of racing, helping professional gravity athletes achieve winning performances.

Floatx2Neo2.jpg?VersionId=NfnqlD7LyGNxMGeEQo.F636B

The Definitive Gravity Shock—Now Faster

The FLOAT X2 has long been recognized as the definitive gravity air shock—delivering exceptional sensitivity, support, and adjustability for Enduro and Downhill racing.  With Live Valve Neo integration, that performance is elevated even further.
Monotube construction increases durability and enables pressure balancing, improving damping response and consistency under the highest loads.

Live Suspension Gives You More

Live Valve Neo doesn’t replace rider preference—it enhances it.  A 7-position Firm Mode adjust dial allows riders to fine-tune how supportive the shock feels when firmed, while The Low Speed Compression and High Speed/Low Speed Rebound dials let riders dial in their ideal descending performance. Our FOX Bike App provides the opportunity to further adapt Live Valve Neo to your ride style - with preset tunes or customization through our Precision Mode adjustments.

The combination of pressure-balanced damping, 4-way adjustability, and ultra-fast electronic control creates a system that keeps tires glued to the ground while maintaining chassis stability at speed. The ride sensation is often compared to a trophy truck—where the bike remains composed while the suspension absorbs the terrain beneath it.

For gravity riders, that translates directly into:

- Increased traction
-Reduced fatigue
- Greater confidence at speed

Floatx2Neo3

Own the Moment

The FLOAT X2 Live Valve Neo represents a new benchmark in suspension performance—where cutting-edge mechanical engineering meets real-time electronic intelligence. Because in gravity, speed comes from control—and control comes from traction. 

FOX FLOAT X2 Neo Product Pages
USA: https://ridefox.com/pages/fox-float-x2-live-valve-neo-learn-more

CAN: https://ca.ridefox.com/pages/fox-float-x2-live-valve-neo-learn-more

AUS: https://au.ridefox.com/pages/fox-float-x2-live-valve-neo-learn-more

Floatx2Neo4

Float X2 Neo Highlights
- F-S and P-SE Neo Wireless
- CAN bus version custom for ORBEA
- Trunnion and standard eyelet options
- Wide range of sizes
- 3-way adjustable – high and low speed rebound, low speed compression
- Tool-free rebound and compression adjusters
- 750g (210x55)
- Uses same battery as all other Neo products
- Pressure Balanced Monotube architecture for GRIP X2 fork damper-level performance in a rear shock
- Larger 1/2” diameter shaft for increased strength and durability
- 1cc increment air volume adjustments for ultra-pre- cise spring rate tuning (Max 350psi)
- Updated Variable Valve Control (VVC) on high-speed rebound
- Parallel reservoir orientation available for frame clearance (select sizes)
- 7-click Firm mode adjust, 11-click Low-Speed com pression (same as LV Neo Float X/DHX)

Sizes and Pricing

Screen Shot 2026-04-14 at 8.19.07 AMScreen Shot 2026-04-14 at 8.19.21 AM.png?VersionId=oALok2izNeQIoCz7 6GtecgmiVrSep

1
Primoz
Posts
4606
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
5/22/2026 11:54pm

One quick question, previous gen Super Deluxe Air had the option to be udoated to the high flow piston and the new force-named compression and rebound shim stacks. On the coil side the update was pushed out in the form of Super Deluxe Coil being renamed to the Vivid Coil.

Is there nevertheless an upgrade option for the last Super Deluxe Coil in the same vein as there is for the Air? Or could I revalve it to the same tune I had previously in my air shock and get similar results? 

(there are some cheap used options out there and I'm getting a spending itch 😂) 

3
Finkill
Posts
234
Joined
9/2/2015
Location
GB
6/5/2026 4:19pm Edited Date/Time 6/5/2026 4:21pm

Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it in my forks. Unfortunately the service info on the SRAM site says it isn't backwards compatible and can only be used on MY27 forks, they say it will cause mayhem with older forks/seals. 

Can anyone confirm this or is it BS, has anyone tried the new grease? 

The Maxima site doesn't say anything about issues with using it in older products. 

1
6/6/2026 12:07am
Finkill wrote:
Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it...

Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it in my forks. Unfortunately the service info on the SRAM site says it isn't backwards compatible and can only be used on MY27 forks, they say it will cause mayhem with older forks/seals. 

Can anyone confirm this or is it BS, has anyone tried the new grease? 

The Maxima site doesn't say anything about issues with using it in older products. 

I have nothing to back this up but sounds like BS

7
AndehM
Posts
687
Joined
5/7/2018
Location
El Granada, CA US
Fantasy
6/6/2026 7:41am

I've got a question related to shock tune that doesn't make sense to me.  I've seen a few reviews of the Dreadnought v2 and I think it also came up on the Druid CorE and Dreadnought E, where the reviewers mention the Vivid's shock tune feels harsh.  It comes with an R85 C26 tune, which compared to the generic retail tune of R55 C34 should be very fast rebound and very light comp.  The LR graphs look normal for a modern enduro bike.  Anti-squat looks high vs. a non-HP bike but that's kinda the point of HP.  AR looks extremely low (on Dreadnought E, appears to be 3.5% -> -9.5%).  Is this harshness reviewers talk about likely due to too light of a comp tune, or something related to the weird AR?  I'd think that crazy low AR will cause it to squat like crazy, which coupled with low comp tune could lead to a feeling of harshness when it gets deep into the stroke.

1
AndehM
Posts
687
Joined
5/7/2018
Location
El Granada, CA US
Fantasy
6/6/2026 7:45am
AndehM wrote:
I've got a question related to shock tune that doesn't make sense to me.  I've seen a few reviews of the Dreadnought v2 and I think...

I've got a question related to shock tune that doesn't make sense to me.  I've seen a few reviews of the Dreadnought v2 and I think it also came up on the Druid CorE and Dreadnought E, where the reviewers mention the Vivid's shock tune feels harsh.  It comes with an R85 C26 tune, which compared to the generic retail tune of R55 C34 should be very fast rebound and very light comp.  The LR graphs look normal for a modern enduro bike.  Anti-squat looks high vs. a non-HP bike but that's kinda the point of HP.  AR looks extremely low (on Dreadnought E, appears to be 3.5% -> -9.5%).  Is this harshness reviewers talk about likely due to too light of a comp tune, or something related to the weird AR?  I'd think that crazy low AR will cause it to squat like crazy, which coupled with low comp tune could lead to a feeling of harshness when it gets deep into the stroke.

Edit:  I had AR backwards.  These bikes should fight like crazy to extend.  So I'm still confused why the rear end with that shock/tune would feel harsh.

2
Jakub_G
Posts
358
Joined
8/7/2019
Location
SK
6/6/2026 8:11am
Finkill wrote:
Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it...

Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it in my forks. Unfortunately the service info on the SRAM site says it isn't backwards compatible and can only be used on MY27 forks, they say it will cause mayhem with older forks/seals. 

Can anyone confirm this or is it BS, has anyone tried the new grease? 

The Maxima site doesn't say anything about issues with using it in older products. 

From the manufacturer's website:For use on all forks, shocks, and reciprocating hydraulic systems where smooth action is critical. Safe for NBR, Fluoroelastomer, Urethane, and Silicone seal materials.

2
Finkill
Posts
234
Joined
9/2/2015
Location
GB
6/6/2026 8:30am
Finkill wrote:
Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it...

Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it in my forks. Unfortunately the service info on the SRAM site says it isn't backwards compatible and can only be used on MY27 forks, they say it will cause mayhem with older forks/seals. 

Can anyone confirm this or is it BS, has anyone tried the new grease? 

The Maxima site doesn't say anything about issues with using it in older products. 

Jakub_G wrote:
From the manufacturer's website:For use on all forks, shocks, and reciprocating hydraulic systems where smooth action is critical. Safe for NBR, Fluoroelastomer, Urethane, and Silicone seal...

From the manufacturer's website:For use on all forks, shocks, and reciprocating hydraulic systems where smooth action is critical. Safe for NBR, Fluoroelastomer, Urethane, and Silicone seal materials.

Which is is completely the opposite to what Rockshox are saying https://support.rockshox.com/hc/en-us/articles/46636920845211-Is-SG920-reverse-compatible-with-older-RockShox-forks-If-so-which-forks 

Almost certainly BS,but I'm not brave enough to try it in my 2025 Zebs, going to stick with the SRAM butter. 

1
snowsnakes
Posts
82
Joined
6/5/2025
Location
Anchorage, AK US
6/6/2026 11:24am

Could delayed service on the linkage/shock cause sag to display improperly? This season my Sentinel seems like it’s riding better at 27% sag, which last season was way too firm. It’s also seen plenty of inclement weather and wet conditions between last fall and this spring, so I’m wondering if the stiction there is causing a discrepancy between static sag in the garage and dynamic sag when I’m actually riding. 

1
Jakub_G
Posts
358
Joined
8/7/2019
Location
SK
6/7/2026 9:49am
snowsnakes wrote:
Could delayed service on the linkage/shock cause sag to display improperly? This season my Sentinel seems like it’s riding better at 27% sag, which last season...

Could delayed service on the linkage/shock cause sag to display improperly? This season my Sentinel seems like it’s riding better at 27% sag, which last season was way too firm. It’s also seen plenty of inclement weather and wet conditions between last fall and this spring, so I’m wondering if the stiction there is causing a discrepancy between static sag in the garage and dynamic sag when I’m actually riding. 

Sure can, sticky linkage will throw sag measurements off, measuring sag can be even used to estimate if your bearings need service. Good guide is published in motorcycle suspension bible.

2
snowsnakes
Posts
82
Joined
6/5/2025
Location
Anchorage, AK US
6/7/2026 11:19am
snowsnakes wrote:
Could delayed service on the linkage/shock cause sag to display improperly? This season my Sentinel seems like it’s riding better at 27% sag, which last season...

Could delayed service on the linkage/shock cause sag to display improperly? This season my Sentinel seems like it’s riding better at 27% sag, which last season was way too firm. It’s also seen plenty of inclement weather and wet conditions between last fall and this spring, so I’m wondering if the stiction there is causing a discrepancy between static sag in the garage and dynamic sag when I’m actually riding. 

Jakub_G wrote:
Sure can, sticky linkage will throw sag measurements off, measuring sag can be even used to estimate if your bearings need service. Good guide is published...

Sure can, sticky linkage will throw sag measurements off, measuring sag can be even used to estimate if your bearings need service. Good guide is published in motorcycle suspension bible.

That confirms my suspicions, thank you! I was like “well, guess it’s time to get a Vivid” and then I remembered I was actually really happy with the bike last fall, and figured something else must be off. 

1
comatosegi
Posts
80
Joined
8/28/2025
Location
Portland, OR US
1 day ago
Finkill wrote:
Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it...

Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it in my forks. Unfortunately the service info on the SRAM site says it isn't backwards compatible and can only be used on MY27 forks, they say it will cause mayhem with older forks/seals. 

Can anyone confirm this or is it BS, has anyone tried the new grease? 

The Maxima site doesn't say anything about issues with using it in older products. 

RS started using it last year.  One of the RS shops is actually trying to blend it with older SRAM butter. Parking lot, butter feels better, but at temp 920 is better. I run it blended, no issues.

2
1 day ago
AndehM wrote:
I've got a question related to shock tune that doesn't make sense to me.  I've seen a few reviews of the Dreadnought v2 and I think...

I've got a question related to shock tune that doesn't make sense to me.  I've seen a few reviews of the Dreadnought v2 and I think it also came up on the Druid CorE and Dreadnought E, where the reviewers mention the Vivid's shock tune feels harsh.  It comes with an R85 C26 tune, which compared to the generic retail tune of R55 C34 should be very fast rebound and very light comp.  The LR graphs look normal for a modern enduro bike.  Anti-squat looks high vs. a non-HP bike but that's kinda the point of HP.  AR looks extremely low (on Dreadnought E, appears to be 3.5% -> -9.5%).  Is this harshness reviewers talk about likely due to too light of a comp tune, or something related to the weird AR?  I'd think that crazy low AR will cause it to squat like crazy, which coupled with low comp tune could lead to a feeling of harshness when it gets deep into the stroke.

C26 is very soft so thats possibly the cause - all the rebound tunes are slow as well which doesn't help. High pivot bikes usually suit light low speed compression damping and more high speed compression, so if there LSC is a bit too firm (or even friction in the air shock) then that could feel harsh too.

2
1 day ago
Primoz wrote:
One quick question, previous gen Super Deluxe Air had the option to be udoated to the high flow piston and the new force-named compression and rebound...

One quick question, previous gen Super Deluxe Air had the option to be udoated to the high flow piston and the new force-named compression and rebound shim stacks. On the coil side the update was pushed out in the form of Super Deluxe Coil being renamed to the Vivid Coil.

Is there nevertheless an upgrade option for the last Super Deluxe Coil in the same vein as there is for the Air? Or could I revalve it to the same tune I had previously in my air shock and get similar results? 

(there are some cheap used options out there and I'm getting a spending itch 😂) 

I don't think so - the piston design basically stayed the same and they just added the touchdown "feature" . I think you can pretty much use the Vivid coil tunes in a Super Deluxe as well, just double check the stack heights. At least on the compression - I would avoid using the stiffer/progressive rebound tunes in an SDLX, I found it generated huge pressures and caused some weird blow-by behaviour, which I believe is the true reason for the touchdown piston with 2 glide rings, and the newest Vivid just used a thicker piston that doesn't flex instead.

1
AndehM
Posts
687
Joined
5/7/2018
Location
El Granada, CA US
Fantasy
1 day ago
AndehM wrote:
I've got a question related to shock tune that doesn't make sense to me.  I've seen a few reviews of the Dreadnought v2 and I think...

I've got a question related to shock tune that doesn't make sense to me.  I've seen a few reviews of the Dreadnought v2 and I think it also came up on the Druid CorE and Dreadnought E, where the reviewers mention the Vivid's shock tune feels harsh.  It comes with an R85 C26 tune, which compared to the generic retail tune of R55 C34 should be very fast rebound and very light comp.  The LR graphs look normal for a modern enduro bike.  Anti-squat looks high vs. a non-HP bike but that's kinda the point of HP.  AR looks extremely low (on Dreadnought E, appears to be 3.5% -> -9.5%).  Is this harshness reviewers talk about likely due to too light of a comp tune, or something related to the weird AR?  I'd think that crazy low AR will cause it to squat like crazy, which coupled with low comp tune could lead to a feeling of harshness when it gets deep into the stroke.

C26 is very soft so thats possibly the cause - all the rebound tunes are slow as well which doesn't help. High pivot bikes usually suit...

C26 is very soft so thats possibly the cause - all the rebound tunes are slow as well which doesn't help. High pivot bikes usually suit light low speed compression damping and more high speed compression, so if there LSC is a bit too firm (or even friction in the air shock) then that could feel harsh too.

Makes sense.  I now realized I mischaracterized the shock's rebound tune (higher number = higher resistance/more damping by the RS scheme), so that could lead to packing.  In addition I also misread the AR graph, so maybe they thought they needed heavily damped rebound to make up for the total lack of AR?

1
1 day ago
Finkill wrote:
Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it...

Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it in my forks. Unfortunately the service info on the SRAM site says it isn't backwards compatible and can only be used on MY27 forks, they say it will cause mayhem with older forks/seals. 

Can anyone confirm this or is it BS, has anyone tried the new grease? 

The Maxima site doesn't say anything about issues with using it in older products. 

comatosegi wrote:
RS started using it last year.  One of the RS shops is actually trying to blend it with older SRAM butter. Parking lot, butter feels better...

RS started using it last year.  One of the RS shops is actually trying to blend it with older SRAM butter. Parking lot, butter feels better, but at temp 920 is better. I run it blended, no issues.

Slickoleum/sram butter is one of those products I've always found so good and reliable that there is literally no reason to change from it - I was thinking they might have done it to reduce the cost and stick to one manufacturer, but if thats true they certainly aren't passing those savings on 😅

It's probably really good - but so is sram butter so just use whatever you feel like or can easily get. From the little info I can get out the MSDS it just looks like calcium sulfonate grease (like slickoleum) with there own 11 herbs and spices so I don't see any reason it wouldn't be interchangeable (that would also be very stupid - All the seals are the same old elastomers)

3
Finkill
Posts
234
Joined
9/2/2015
Location
GB
1 day ago
Finkill wrote:
Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it...

Just looking at the new Maxima SG920 grease that SRAM claim is a step up from the usual suspension grease and was keen to try it in my forks. Unfortunately the service info on the SRAM site says it isn't backwards compatible and can only be used on MY27 forks, they say it will cause mayhem with older forks/seals. 

Can anyone confirm this or is it BS, has anyone tried the new grease? 

The Maxima site doesn't say anything about issues with using it in older products. 

comatosegi wrote:
RS started using it last year.  One of the RS shops is actually trying to blend it with older SRAM butter. Parking lot, butter feels better...

RS started using it last year.  One of the RS shops is actually trying to blend it with older SRAM butter. Parking lot, butter feels better, but at temp 920 is better. I run it blended, no issues.

Slickoleum/sram butter is one of those products I've always found so good and reliable that there is literally no reason to change from it - I...

Slickoleum/sram butter is one of those products I've always found so good and reliable that there is literally no reason to change from it - I was thinking they might have done it to reduce the cost and stick to one manufacturer, but if thats true they certainly aren't passing those savings on 😅

It's probably really good - but so is sram butter so just use whatever you feel like or can easily get. From the little info I can get out the MSDS it just looks like calcium sulfonate grease (like slickoleum) with there own 11 herbs and spices so I don't see any reason it wouldn't be interchangeable (that would also be very stupid - All the seals are the same old elastomers)

Not sure that I'm ready to join in on mixing different greases just yet!

I will stick with the SRAM butter for now. I think the biggest performance improvement I can give myself is servicing my suspension sooner rather than later. A freshly serviced fork is a wonderful thing. 

3
1 day ago

Here's something I was thinking about the other day while day dreaming about a park bike: if you were to equip a coil USD fork, like a Dorado Comp, with an open-bath damper, could you just pour the old oil out, pour new oil in, then call it a day for most services?  I know that seals have to be replaced every once and again, but they must last a long time in an USD fork, no? 

2
23 hours ago
Here's something I was thinking about the other day while day dreaming about a park bike: if you were to equip a coil USD fork, like...

Here's something I was thinking about the other day while day dreaming about a park bike: if you were to equip a coil USD fork, like a Dorado Comp, with an open-bath damper, could you just pour the old oil out, pour new oil in, then call it a day for most services?  I know that seals have to be replaced every once and again, but they must last a long time in an USD fork, no? 

In theory, yes - thats why Push has a 50 hour "speed service" for the nine-one that lets you drain the old oil and fill it back up without disassembly, but for other brands its normally worth opening things up to make sure nothing is wearing out. Maybe after a while you would get a feel for how its holding up (if the oil was discolouring each time it means something is wearing or seals are failing) and you could extend things further without a rebuild.

This was basically what we did with the old open bath marzocchis and it was sort of OK but I later learnt that the internals would still wear pretty badly (although that was mostly because they didn't anodise the damper sliding surfaces) and the seals tended to run fine for ages and then fail completely in one go......

IMO that approach is really good for maintaining performance between major rebuilds, just be aware it doesn't exactly "extend" the time between services. Things like Nitrile seals break down from being exposed to oxygen and PU seals take set and break down over time so personally I find after about 2 years you will want to replace the important seals regardless of use and servicing.  Obviously people often get much longer than that but I find its a bit of a gamble so I don't advise it.

5

Post a reply to: Suspension Component Technology/Functionality Discussion

The Latest