2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

Related:
Eae903
Posts
382
Joined
10/20/2023
Location
Laramie, WY US
Fantasy
1 day ago
Ambushell wrote:
Gas Gas had the right idea with the moto-inspired replaceable plastics kits for their ECC ebikes. How many carbon frames become landfill waste from rock strikes...

Gas Gas had the right idea with the moto-inspired replaceable plastics kits for their ECC ebikes. How many carbon frames become landfill waste from rock strikes or crashes where a sacrificial "fairing" could have taken the blow? If the industry wants to improve durability, this is the right place.

17367.jpg?VersionId=mtn

Only those plastics rattled so badly that the little fittings fell out and looked horrible. They were not a highlight of the bike in the slightest. 

6
Primoz
Posts
4581
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
1 day ago
The vast majority of the advancement of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic materials is centered around aerospace. Carbon fiber reinforced bikes (mainly epoxy based) have "veered...

The vast majority of the advancement of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic materials is centered around aerospace. Carbon fiber reinforced bikes (mainly epoxy based) have "veered away" from aero materials - their processes and needs have evolved and are now somewhat different. So, thermoplastic composites (TPC's) have not been as targeted towards bikes. If you look at material test data, there are TPC's with similar or even better performance (strength/stiffness vs weight) than epoxy/CF being used now in bike parts (especially a property called "facture toughness"). But, these highest performing TPC's are higher priced in general, higher processing temp, and more difficult to lay-up/preform. But, the properties are there, just need someone to continue the efforts in part design and processing that companies like GG, R4 and CSS did. Bikes are already using the strongest fibers in the world (arguably the strongest material in the world - at least in the fiber direction); it's more of just changing the resin - if there is market demand and engineering/performance reasons. 

I'm not sure many of us would buy bikes or bike parts if they were made of aerospace carbon... The price would be quite a bit higher than what we have now.

As for removable panels, cool idea, but it adds weight and I don't think it would fly for most (pedal) bike riders at the end of the day. 

4
SnusDog
Posts
43
Joined
12/28/2020
Location
Santa Fe, NM US
Fantasy
1 day ago

New Supernaught development - Dred E with a Boxxer, custom link and what looks to be a bb conversion where the motor was? 

IMG 4744 1IMG 4743 1

5
TEAMROBOT
Posts
1416
Joined
9/2/2009
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
Fantasy
1 day ago
SnusDog wrote:
New Supernaught development - Dred E with a Boxxer, custom link and what looks to be a bb conversion where the motor was? 

New Supernaught development - Dred E with a Boxxer, custom link and what looks to be a bb conversion where the motor was? 

IMG 4744 1IMG 4743 1

Also looks like no Ochain on Jackson's V10, which would be a big change from his normal 16 degree custom Ochain setup. Either this is a freeride/bike park V10, or he has some hub magic going on. Wonder if this is a result of SRAM buying the chain of O.

7
storm.racing
Posts
317
Joined
2/15/2022
Location
Silverton, CO US
1 day ago
SnusDog wrote:
New Supernaught development - Dred E with a Boxxer, custom link and what looks to be a bb conversion where the motor was? 

New Supernaught development - Dred E with a Boxxer, custom link and what looks to be a bb conversion where the motor was? 

IMG 4744 1IMG 4743 1

TEAMROBOT wrote:
Also looks like no Ochain on Jackson's V10, which would be a big change from his normal 16 degree custom Ochain setup. Either this is a...

Also looks like no Ochain on Jackson's V10, which would be a big change from his normal 16 degree custom Ochain setup. Either this is a freeride/bike park V10, or he has some hub magic going on. Wonder if this is a result of SRAM buying the chain of O.

You looking specifically at that pic? If so, that’s not his bike in the pic. He’s just unloading it. In other pics from the same day, he’s on his usual bike. 
But to confirm- levers are not flat enough, bars are rolled back, no stem spacers for that high stack, old fork, no ochain, diff tire set up.

Sorry I rambled. Dif bike haha



Now in regard to ochain… I’m definitely curious about that! He was the main guy prototyping higher/different degrees… and now it’s Sram. So it’ll be interesting to see how that’ll play out

12
TEAMROBOT
Posts
1416
Joined
9/2/2009
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
Fantasy
1 day ago
You looking specifically at that pic? If so, that’s not his bike in the pic. He’s just unloading it. In other pics from the same day...

You looking specifically at that pic? If so, that’s not his bike in the pic. He’s just unloading it. In other pics from the same day, he’s on his usual bike. 
But to confirm- levers are not flat enough, bars are rolled back, no stem spacers for that high stack, old fork, no ochain, diff tire set up.

Sorry I rambled. Dif bike haha



Now in regard to ochain… I’m definitely curious about that! He was the main guy prototyping higher/different degrees… and now it’s Sram. So it’ll be interesting to see how that’ll play out

Good eye, I think you're right and his bike is in the middle in the top three bikes hanging over the cab.

1
1 day ago
SnusDog wrote:
New Supernaught development - Dred E with a Boxxer, custom link and what looks to be a bb conversion where the motor was? 

New Supernaught development - Dred E with a Boxxer, custom link and what looks to be a bb conversion where the motor was? 

IMG 4744 1IMG 4743 1

TEAMROBOT wrote:
Also looks like no Ochain on Jackson's V10, which would be a big change from his normal 16 degree custom Ochain setup. Either this is a...

Also looks like no Ochain on Jackson's V10, which would be a big change from his normal 16 degree custom Ochain setup. Either this is a freeride/bike park V10, or he has some hub magic going on. Wonder if this is a result of SRAM buying the chain of O.

You looking specifically at that pic? If so, that’s not his bike in the pic. He’s just unloading it. In other pics from the same day...

You looking specifically at that pic? If so, that’s not his bike in the pic. He’s just unloading it. In other pics from the same day, he’s on his usual bike. 
But to confirm- levers are not flat enough, bars are rolled back, no stem spacers for that high stack, old fork, no ochain, diff tire set up.

Sorry I rambled. Dif bike haha



Now in regard to ochain… I’m definitely curious about that! He was the main guy prototyping higher/different degrees… and now it’s Sram. So it’ll be interesting to see how that’ll play out

From what I have been told regarding O Chain. They are continuing support of other mounting styles besides SRAM. That said that question was asked over 10 months ago so things could have changed and I haven't asked that since. Though SRAM doesn't even sell O Chain directly yet so I would assume the Shimano crank enjoyers are safe..for now...

1
8
1 day ago
From what I have been told regarding O Chain. They are continuing support of other mounting styles besides SRAM. That said that question was asked over...

From what I have been told regarding O Chain. They are continuing support of other mounting styles besides SRAM. That said that question was asked over 10 months ago so things could have changed and I haven't asked that since. Though SRAM doesn't even sell O Chain directly yet so I would assume the Shimano crank enjoyers are safe..for now...

This discussion started because they released a new version which is only compatible with SRAM cranks, and is sold direct…

https://shop.sram.com/collections/ochain

10
1 day ago Edited Date/Time 20 hours ago
From what I have been told regarding O Chain. They are continuing support of other mounting styles besides SRAM. That said that question was asked over...

From what I have been told regarding O Chain. They are continuing support of other mounting styles besides SRAM. That said that question was asked over 10 months ago so things could have changed and I haven't asked that since. Though SRAM doesn't even sell O Chain directly yet so I would assume the Shimano crank enjoyers are safe..for now...

chriskief wrote:

This discussion started because they released a new version which is only compatible with SRAM cranks, and is sold direct…

https://shop.sram.com/collections/ochain

Oh wow. I guess I spoke too soon. I was just on their internal B2B last week (post new o chain) and it wasn’t there. Also stoked to see Shop SRAM has a more complete catalog now! Good to know. Thank you. 

2
6
1 day ago
The vast majority of the advancement of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic materials is centered around aerospace. Carbon fiber reinforced bikes (mainly epoxy based) have "veered...

The vast majority of the advancement of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic materials is centered around aerospace. Carbon fiber reinforced bikes (mainly epoxy based) have "veered away" from aero materials - their processes and needs have evolved and are now somewhat different. So, thermoplastic composites (TPC's) have not been as targeted towards bikes. If you look at material test data, there are TPC's with similar or even better performance (strength/stiffness vs weight) than epoxy/CF being used now in bike parts (especially a property called "facture toughness"). But, these highest performing TPC's are higher priced in general, higher processing temp, and more difficult to lay-up/preform. But, the properties are there, just need someone to continue the efforts in part design and processing that companies like GG, R4 and CSS did. Bikes are already using the strongest fibers in the world (arguably the strongest material in the world - at least in the fiber direction); it's more of just changing the resin - if there is market demand and engineering/performance reasons. 

Primoz wrote:
I'm not sure many of us would buy bikes or bike parts if they were made of aerospace carbon... The price would be quite a bit...

I'm not sure many of us would buy bikes or bike parts if they were made of aerospace carbon... The price would be quite a bit higher than what we have now.

As for removable panels, cool idea, but it adds weight and I don't think it would fly for most (pedal) bike riders at the end of the day. 

You are already riding bikes with aerospace carbon fiber. The actual fiber is the same as what's used in aerospace. Example: Toray T1100 is the world's strongest fiber and used in both bikes and aero. T1200 coming and will be 10% stronger.  What's different is mainly the resin and the process of making the bike. Note I could argue some of the bike parts I've seen are actually more complex and high performance than many aerospace manufacturers would/could make. It's impressive how far we've come in this industry. 

12
Blake_Motley
Posts
174
Joined
11/14/2013
Location
Chula Vista, CA US
23 hours ago Edited Date/Time 23 hours ago
SnusDog wrote:
New Supernaught development - Dred E with a Boxxer, custom link and what looks to be a bb conversion where the motor was? 

New Supernaught development - Dred E with a Boxxer, custom link and what looks to be a bb conversion where the motor was? 

IMG 4744 1IMG 4743 1

Whatever that link is I want it available to buy asap

2
23 hours ago
The vast majority of the advancement of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic materials is centered around aerospace. Carbon fiber reinforced bikes (mainly epoxy based) have "veered...

The vast majority of the advancement of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic materials is centered around aerospace. Carbon fiber reinforced bikes (mainly epoxy based) have "veered away" from aero materials - their processes and needs have evolved and are now somewhat different. So, thermoplastic composites (TPC's) have not been as targeted towards bikes. If you look at material test data, there are TPC's with similar or even better performance (strength/stiffness vs weight) than epoxy/CF being used now in bike parts (especially a property called "facture toughness"). But, these highest performing TPC's are higher priced in general, higher processing temp, and more difficult to lay-up/preform. But, the properties are there, just need someone to continue the efforts in part design and processing that companies like GG, R4 and CSS did. Bikes are already using the strongest fibers in the world (arguably the strongest material in the world - at least in the fiber direction); it's more of just changing the resin - if there is market demand and engineering/performance reasons. 

Primoz wrote:
I'm not sure many of us would buy bikes or bike parts if they were made of aerospace carbon... The price would be quite a bit...

I'm not sure many of us would buy bikes or bike parts if they were made of aerospace carbon... The price would be quite a bit higher than what we have now.

As for removable panels, cool idea, but it adds weight and I don't think it would fly for most (pedal) bike riders at the end of the day. 

You are already riding bikes with aerospace carbon fiber. The actual fiber is the same as what's used in aerospace. Example: Toray T1100 is the world's...

You are already riding bikes with aerospace carbon fiber. The actual fiber is the same as what's used in aerospace. Example: Toray T1100 is the world's strongest fiber and used in both bikes and aero. T1200 coming and will be 10% stronger.  What's different is mainly the resin and the process of making the bike. Note I could argue some of the bike parts I've seen are actually more complex and high performance than many aerospace manufacturers would/could make. It's impressive how far we've come in this industry. 

All these aerospace grade components and I still can barely get any air. 

15
23 hours ago
You are already riding bikes with aerospace carbon fiber. The actual fiber is the same as what's used in aerospace. Example: Toray T1100 is the world's...

You are already riding bikes with aerospace carbon fiber. The actual fiber is the same as what's used in aerospace. Example: Toray T1100 is the world's strongest fiber and used in both bikes and aero. T1200 coming and will be 10% stronger.  What's different is mainly the resin and the process of making the bike. Note I could argue some of the bike parts I've seen are actually more complex and high performance than many aerospace manufacturers would/could make. It's impressive how far we've come in this industry. 

However, if it wasn't for advancements in other fields, we wouldn't be where we are today..

1
owl-x
Posts
894
Joined
3/23/2016
Location
Shell Beach, CA US
22 hours ago

touting recyclability of a bike frame sure feels a lot like the weirdo prudes who push for hemp fabrics as a reason for cannabis legalization…I mean, I have some hemp jeans but we’re all adults here: we’re trying to get high bro!

We recycle pretty much zero plastic. I wish it mattered, but it simply does not. 

2
10
amanitas
Posts
3
Joined
5/12/2026
Location
Bellingham, WA US
20 hours ago
The vast majority of the advancement of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic materials is centered around aerospace. Carbon fiber reinforced bikes (mainly epoxy based) have "veered...

The vast majority of the advancement of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic materials is centered around aerospace. Carbon fiber reinforced bikes (mainly epoxy based) have "veered away" from aero materials - their processes and needs have evolved and are now somewhat different. So, thermoplastic composites (TPC's) have not been as targeted towards bikes. If you look at material test data, there are TPC's with similar or even better performance (strength/stiffness vs weight) than epoxy/CF being used now in bike parts (especially a property called "facture toughness"). But, these highest performing TPC's are higher priced in general, higher processing temp, and more difficult to lay-up/preform. But, the properties are there, just need someone to continue the efforts in part design and processing that companies like GG, R4 and CSS did. Bikes are already using the strongest fibers in the world (arguably the strongest material in the world - at least in the fiber direction); it's more of just changing the resin - if there is market demand and engineering/performance reasons. 

Primoz wrote:
I'm not sure many of us would buy bikes or bike parts if they were made of aerospace carbon... The price would be quite a bit...

I'm not sure many of us would buy bikes or bike parts if they were made of aerospace carbon... The price would be quite a bit higher than what we have now.

As for removable panels, cool idea, but it adds weight and I don't think it would fly for most (pedal) bike riders at the end of the day. 

You are already riding bikes with aerospace carbon fiber. The actual fiber is the same as what's used in aerospace. Example: Toray T1100 is the world's...

You are already riding bikes with aerospace carbon fiber. The actual fiber is the same as what's used in aerospace. Example: Toray T1100 is the world's strongest fiber and used in both bikes and aero. T1200 coming and will be 10% stronger.  What's different is mainly the resin and the process of making the bike. Note I could argue some of the bike parts I've seen are actually more complex and high performance than many aerospace manufacturers would/could make. It's impressive how far we've come in this industry. 

Long time lurker, first time poster here. For some background I’m an aerospace composites engineer and spent several years in Advanced Product Development with an emphasis on environmentally friendly materials. There’s so much to get into on this topic and if folks are interested I’d love to start a dedicated thread on materials and environmental impacts.

The TLDR is, carbon fiber as a green product on its own is a fallacy. The raw fiber production may result in a certain level of carbon sequestering, but the process is still so energy intensive I wouldn’t call it an environmental positive. As for the resin, both thermo-set and thermo-plastics are petroleum derived products so we’re already not off to a great start.

Now to the recycling claims. Traditional thermosets can be recycled, but the process involves so many nasty chemicals it’s also not a viable process. Thermoplastics can in fact be reconstituted into new products with the caveat that there is always degradation in material properties. This is why products like tire levers and other non-structural parts are prime candidates for recycled material. My personal opinion is the bike companies touting TPC’s as environmentally friendly are in a best-case misinformed, or worst-case green washing. 

Again, this is such a rabbit hole topic and there is a ton of nuance. But it’s an interesting topic and important to think about how we can reduce the impact our sport has on the environment. There’s also a ton of smart people and industry insiders in this forum that can probably chime in.

51
Simcik
Posts
438
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
Loma, CO US
19 hours ago
amanitas wrote:
Long time lurker, first time poster here. For some background I’m an aerospace composites engineer and spent several years in Advanced Product Development with an emphasis...

Long time lurker, first time poster here. For some background I’m an aerospace composites engineer and spent several years in Advanced Product Development with an emphasis on environmentally friendly materials. There’s so much to get into on this topic and if folks are interested I’d love to start a dedicated thread on materials and environmental impacts.

The TLDR is, carbon fiber as a green product on its own is a fallacy. The raw fiber production may result in a certain level of carbon sequestering, but the process is still so energy intensive I wouldn’t call it an environmental positive. As for the resin, both thermo-set and thermo-plastics are petroleum derived products so we’re already not off to a great start.

Now to the recycling claims. Traditional thermosets can be recycled, but the process involves so many nasty chemicals it’s also not a viable process. Thermoplastics can in fact be reconstituted into new products with the caveat that there is always degradation in material properties. This is why products like tire levers and other non-structural parts are prime candidates for recycled material. My personal opinion is the bike companies touting TPC’s as environmentally friendly are in a best-case misinformed, or worst-case green washing. 

Again, this is such a rabbit hole topic and there is a ton of nuance. But it’s an interesting topic and important to think about how we can reduce the impact our sport has on the environment. There’s also a ton of smart people and industry insiders in this forum that can probably chime in.

In short, can the cycling industry put thermoplastics in the bin for 25 years again?

3
19 hours ago Edited Date/Time 19 hours ago
jazza_wil wrote:
ahleic09 wrote:
*throwdown  

*throwdown 

 

p5pb29681817.jpg?VersionId=OOwo0X5zhEs0w1kq2

This is a cool bike and I feel like we should be talking more about it in the "MTB Tech Rumors" thread than the environmental impact of thermoplastics and carbon fibre. 

I love a simple, metal bike that can take a beating and it makes me think of a RAAW Madonna, but with a shorter rear end. At $3400, it's priced right in between the Madonna R ($2900cad) and Madonna 3.2 ($3900)

4
sspomer
Posts
6132
Joined
6/26/2009
Location
Boise, ID US
Fantasy
18 hours ago

potential inappropriate content warning 🤣 updated version of neko explaining his 32" experiment from mountain creek

15
TEAMROBOT
Posts
1416
Joined
9/2/2009
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
Fantasy
17 hours ago
sspomer wrote:

potential inappropriate content warning 🤣 updated version of neko explaining his 32" experiment from mountain creek

This was great. Endless curiosity at this point.

5
amanitas
Posts
3
Joined
5/12/2026
Location
Bellingham, WA US
17 hours ago
amanitas wrote:
Long time lurker, first time poster here. For some background I’m an aerospace composites engineer and spent several years in Advanced Product Development with an emphasis...

Long time lurker, first time poster here. For some background I’m an aerospace composites engineer and spent several years in Advanced Product Development with an emphasis on environmentally friendly materials. There’s so much to get into on this topic and if folks are interested I’d love to start a dedicated thread on materials and environmental impacts.

The TLDR is, carbon fiber as a green product on its own is a fallacy. The raw fiber production may result in a certain level of carbon sequestering, but the process is still so energy intensive I wouldn’t call it an environmental positive. As for the resin, both thermo-set and thermo-plastics are petroleum derived products so we’re already not off to a great start.

Now to the recycling claims. Traditional thermosets can be recycled, but the process involves so many nasty chemicals it’s also not a viable process. Thermoplastics can in fact be reconstituted into new products with the caveat that there is always degradation in material properties. This is why products like tire levers and other non-structural parts are prime candidates for recycled material. My personal opinion is the bike companies touting TPC’s as environmentally friendly are in a best-case misinformed, or worst-case green washing. 

Again, this is such a rabbit hole topic and there is a ton of nuance. But it’s an interesting topic and important to think about how we can reduce the impact our sport has on the environment. There’s also a ton of smart people and industry insiders in this forum that can probably chime in.

Simcik wrote:

In short, can the cycling industry put thermoplastics in the bin for 25 years again?

Assuming you’re asking from a technological, not environmental standpoint . Can we technologically put TPC’s in the bin for the next 25 years? That’s a blade that cuts both ways. Unless high performance polymers like PEEK, PEKK, PAEK, PPS, etc come down significantly in price then TPC’s are probably not going to gain much more traction in our industry. But if we don’t work to develop them then there’s zero chance of them being adopted. Much like fossil fuels thermoset resins are so damn good at what they do replacing them is really hard.  

5
ShapeThings
Posts
119
Joined
8/19/2018
Location
Oakland, CA US
17 hours ago
owl-x wrote:
touting recyclability of a bike frame sure feels a lot like the weirdo prudes who push for hemp fabrics as a reason for cannabis legalization…I mean...

touting recyclability of a bike frame sure feels a lot like the weirdo prudes who push for hemp fabrics as a reason for cannabis legalization…I mean, I have some hemp jeans but we’re all adults here: we’re trying to get high bro!

We recycle pretty much zero plastic. I wish it mattered, but it simply does not. 

There is a little predicament in the Persian Gulf that that means the hunger for recycled plastic has skyrocketed. 

Ironically, the moron-in-chief is going to make electric cars, recycling and efficiency a lot more economically attractive in the land of freedumb. 

8
3
16 hours ago

Is that new Chromag the same frame that was built as a purple freeride bike with a DH fork months back?

3
15 hours ago

One thing missing here is the fact that with the proliferation of composite know how, there are more people around able to safely repair a wider range of issues.


Rather than pretending we are recycling carbon bikes I’d love to see more frames designed in ways that facilitate repair. Repair is verifiable in a way that recycling is not, it is cost effective for everyone concerned, and it is as close as you’ll get to good for the environment. It probably flows on to other design decisions to ensure repair is viable (like bearing placement, etc etc), but designing bikes for ongoing duty rather than ‘until they fail’ would leave us all better off. 

25
TEAMROBOT
Posts
1416
Joined
9/2/2009
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
Fantasy
14 hours ago
One thing missing here is the fact that with the proliferation of composite know how, there are more people around able to safely repair a wider...

One thing missing here is the fact that with the proliferation of composite know how, there are more people around able to safely repair a wider range of issues.


Rather than pretending we are recycling carbon bikes I’d love to see more frames designed in ways that facilitate repair. Repair is verifiable in a way that recycling is not, it is cost effective for everyone concerned, and it is as close as you’ll get to good for the environment. It probably flows on to other design decisions to ensure repair is viable (like bearing placement, etc etc), but designing bikes for ongoing duty rather than ‘until they fail’ would leave us all better off. 

Double upvote.

7
Eae903
Posts
382
Joined
10/20/2023
Location
Laramie, WY US
Fantasy
14 hours ago Edited Date/Time 14 hours ago
jalopyj wrote:

Haven't seen anything announced. But new Spot short travel bike:

https://spotbikes.com/products/diggity-125

I have a soft spot for Spot bikes and this new short travel bike looks great.

How is it already on sale? I've literally never seen a spot listed for full price. 

jma853
Posts
36
Joined
10/23/2022
Location
Kabul AF
14 hours ago
jalopyj wrote:

Haven't seen anything announced. But new Spot short travel bike:

https://spotbikes.com/products/diggity-125

I have a soft spot for Spot bikes and this new short travel bike looks great.

Eae903 wrote:

How is it already on sale? I've literally never seen a spot listed for full price. 

It's not easy being a bike company in 2026

Post a reply to: 2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

The Latest