MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation

Related:
11/24/2025 12:34pm Edited Date/Time 11/24/2025 12:34pm

The proto has a very similar rear end to the new Devinci Troy and the Chainsaw. So likely a Devinci...I hope!

 

On the other hand...Sram crank, Fox fork, TRP Brakes with Sram rotor...i don't know :D

1
metadave
Posts
1247
Joined
2/15/2016
Location
Revelstoke, BC CA
Fantasy
11/24/2025 1:28pm
Eae903 wrote:
Ideally, you want the caliper mount on the floating link to reduce the effect of braking forces on the suspension, lower the anti rise. If it's...

Ideally, you want the caliper mount on the floating link to reduce the effect of braking forces on the suspension, lower the anti rise. If it's an inverted system, so that the main pivot is connected to the seat stay and the chainstay is the floating link, then having the brake mount on the seat stay defeats the purpose of having the axle pivot. It's just a LD single pivot with an obnoxious bearing location at that point. Unless they want high anti rise, which is possible. But in regard to the first picture, it doesn't look like a High Pivot, so the brake being mounted to the seat stay is the lower anti rise position. 

None of the previous Wilson’s were high pivot. They have all had the brake mounted to the chainstay and not the seatstay. Even the prototype HP...

None of the previous Wilson’s were high pivot. They have all had the brake mounted to the chainstay and not the seatstay. Even the prototype HP models were designed this way.

I'm pretty sure every Wilson after 2011ish were mid high pivot were they not? The main pivot was half way up the frame and the chain stay pulled a rotating link to actuate the shock

4
Uncle Cliffy
Posts
388
Joined
3/11/2010
Location
Medford, OR US
11/24/2025 3:21pm
metadave wrote:
I'm pretty sure every Wilson after 2011ish were mid high pivot were they not? The main pivot was half way up the frame and the chain...

I'm pretty sure every Wilson after 2011ish were mid high pivot were they not? The main pivot was half way up the frame and the chain stay pulled a rotating link to actuate the shock

Correct, but they never released an idler style high pivot. Only prototypes. 

1
Primoz
Posts
4585
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
11/25/2025 2:11am Edited Date/Time 11/25/2025 2:13am

Correct. But for the day, I think the Wilson was fairly high pivot. Same as the single pivot Gambler. High pivot for a suspension system without an idler that is.

FWIW, when we mention split pivots and caliper locations and certain locations giving a single pivot layout, that is exactly what the high pivot Sender actually is. With the added complication of multiple links driving the shock, not just the chainstay and a rocker. There's an additional rocker in there akin to Knollys 4x4 system, Norcos DH bike system, etc. So it's actually a linkage driven linkage driven single pivot 😂

3
11/25/2025 9:27am
Primoz wrote:
Correct. But for the day, I think the Wilson was fairly high pivot. Same as the single pivot Gambler. High pivot for a suspension system without...

Correct. But for the day, I think the Wilson was fairly high pivot. Same as the single pivot Gambler. High pivot for a suspension system without an idler that is.

FWIW, when we mention split pivots and caliper locations and certain locations giving a single pivot layout, that is exactly what the high pivot Sender actually is. With the added complication of multiple links driving the shock, not just the chainstay and a rocker. There's an additional rocker in there akin to Knollys 4x4 system, Norcos DH bike system, etc. So it's actually a linkage driven linkage driven single pivot 😂

The linkages are like crabs in a bucket, climbing all over each to actuate the shock.

15
FullSend
Posts
190
Joined
7/14/2021
Location
DE
11/25/2025 9:40am Edited Date/Time 11/25/2025 11:28am
Stoll P32

Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. 

Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32

Geometry table is at the very bottom of the page. Though it seems like Stoll won't tell you the full geometry data unless you're ordering a bike. They've got sizes "Medium" and "Large", although people have done the math for the missing geometry numbers and both sizes are very big. The size recommendations seem a little strange, to say the least.

8
1
bikelurker
Posts
179
Joined
3/23/2023
Location
Bilbao, Vizcaya ES
11/25/2025 10:23am
FullSend wrote:
Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32Geometry...
Stoll P32

Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. 

Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32

Geometry table is at the very bottom of the page. Though it seems like Stoll won't tell you the full geometry data unless you're ordering a bike. They've got sizes "Medium" and "Large", although people have done the math for the missing geometry numbers and both sizes are very big. The size recommendations seem a little strange, to say the least.

Spect 5 to 10 years until geometry became sorted. It's the race to be the first to sell that new thing, prototyping is on the hands of the early adopter

7
Jotegr
Posts
349
Joined
6/28/2024
Location
Interior, BC CA
11/25/2025 10:30am Edited Date/Time 11/25/2025 11:07am

What the hell is wrong with these companies? Both Stoll and DirtySixer think they can sell bikes without telling people the geometry.  Is this just some kind of rug pull because they don't know what they're doing, and until Trek or Specialized or whoever comes out with a sorted 32inch bike they can trick people into being early adopters with the alure of new-new (be the first on your block!)? This is some fly by night nonsense. 

 

24
2
bikelurker
Posts
179
Joined
3/23/2023
Location
Bilbao, Vizcaya ES
11/25/2025 11:59am
Jotegr wrote:
What the hell is wrong with these companies? Both Stoll and DirtySixer think they can sell bikes without telling people the geometry.  Is this just some...

What the hell is wrong with these companies? Both Stoll and DirtySixer think they can sell bikes without telling people the geometry.  Is this just some kind of rug pull because they don't know what they're doing, and until Trek or Specialized or whoever comes out with a sorted 32inch bike they can trick people into being early adopters with the alure of new-new (be the first on your block!)? This is some fly by night nonsense. 

 

1000038619 1.jpg?VersionId=

 

5
1
11/25/2025 12:14pm

One thing that became almost immediately clear in the relatively short time that I have been reading and participating in bike-related internet forums is that the proportion of posters that are good at math is extremely high.  It seems that 1 in 10 is an actual engineer, and the proportion of math-brained folks among the remainder is way higher than the public at large.  

As such, holding back geometry information strikes me as misguided because one's efforts are destined to be futile unless they also refuse to release pictures of the product.  From the moment the bike is portrayed in side profile, you may get one day before some mathematically inclined internet sleuth derives it all and spills your beans for you.  

21
owl-x
Posts
899
Joined
3/23/2016
Location
Shell Beach, CA US
11/25/2025 12:26pm

Thanks for the math award. I don’t even practice so it’s double nice. 

We are also very handsome here on the messageboards. 

That bike is super dumb looking. 

39
11/25/2025 2:06pm

The fact that the front triangle looks like it could almost fit inside of one of the wheels gives it a pretty strange look for sure. 

2
owl-x
Posts
899
Joined
3/23/2016
Location
Shell Beach, CA US
11/25/2025 2:52pm

it may not be faster but you’ll find yourself in a lone breakaway every ride

7
11/25/2025 3:15pm Edited Date/Time 11/25/2025 3:16pm
bikelurker wrote:
Spect 5 to 10 years until geometry became sorted. It's the race to be the first to sell that new thing, prototyping is on the hands...

Spect 5 to 10 years until geometry became sorted. It's the race to be the first to sell that new thing, prototyping is on the hands of the early adopter

I'm curious to see the development curve on the 32in..   29 had the interruption of 27.5 and a lot of years trying to make a 29er feel like a 26.. Maybe this time they address what the feel the strengths the 32 are and go at it.. Or, does history repeat itself and we get 30.5 for a minute?  Then we end up at 32/30.5 mixed wheels.. 

6
TEAMROBOT
Posts
1416
Joined
9/2/2009
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
Fantasy
11/25/2025 4:24pm Edited Date/Time 11/25/2025 4:26pm
FullSend wrote:
Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32Geometry...
Stoll P32

Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. 

Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32

Geometry table is at the very bottom of the page. Though it seems like Stoll won't tell you the full geometry data unless you're ordering a bike. They've got sizes "Medium" and "Large", although people have done the math for the missing geometry numbers and both sizes are very big. The size recommendations seem a little strange, to say the least.

Reach: 500mm

Stack: TOP SECRET!!!

Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 4.25.08%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=z9JWKv5RyZ5umasKwAKdrDBivVf0

18
Jotegr
Posts
349
Joined
6/28/2024
Location
Interior, BC CA
11/25/2025 4:42pm
FullSend wrote:
Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32Geometry...
Stoll P32

Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. 

Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32

Geometry table is at the very bottom of the page. Though it seems like Stoll won't tell you the full geometry data unless you're ordering a bike. They've got sizes "Medium" and "Large", although people have done the math for the missing geometry numbers and both sizes are very big. The size recommendations seem a little strange, to say the least.

TEAMROBOT wrote:
Reach: 500mmStack: TOP SECRET!!!

Reach: 500mm

Stack: TOP SECRET!!!

Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 4.25.08%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=z9JWKv5RyZ5umasKwAKdrDBivVf0

Honestly equally secret to Oberrohr for everyone too lazy to use a translator app, myself included. 

3
boozed
Posts
670
Joined
6/11/2019
Location
AU
11/25/2025 4:58pm
FullSend wrote:
Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32Geometry...
Stoll P32

Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. 

Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32

Geometry table is at the very bottom of the page. Though it seems like Stoll won't tell you the full geometry data unless you're ordering a bike. They've got sizes "Medium" and "Large", although people have done the math for the missing geometry numbers and both sizes are very big. The size recommendations seem a little strange, to say the least.

TEAMROBOT wrote:
Reach: 500mmStack: TOP SECRET!!!

Reach: 500mm

Stack: TOP SECRET!!!

Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 4.25.08%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=z9JWKv5RyZ5umasKwAKdrDBivVf0

They won't even let us see their Lenkwinkel.

17
11/25/2025 6:20pm

New Mezzer inbound?

17641235691308133780434311933364 0
19
MauiMax
Posts
124
Joined
5/29/2024
Location
Lahaina, HI US
11/25/2025 8:06pm
New Mezzer inbound?

New Mezzer inbound?

17641235691308133780434311933364 0

Looks like it might be. Lowers look pretty much the same but the fork crown doesnt 

1
11/25/2025 8:32pm

Yeah, the lower casting looks to be the same for sure. The rebound knob is also different from the current version, though, so it will interesting to hear what changes may have been made to the damper.

1
FullSend
Posts
190
Joined
7/14/2021
Location
DE
11/26/2025 4:56am Edited Date/Time 11/26/2025 7:06am
FullSend wrote:
Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32Geometry...
Stoll P32

Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. 

Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32

Geometry table is at the very bottom of the page. Though it seems like Stoll won't tell you the full geometry data unless you're ordering a bike. They've got sizes "Medium" and "Large", although people have done the math for the missing geometry numbers and both sizes are very big. The size recommendations seem a little strange, to say the least.

TEAMROBOT wrote:
Reach: 500mmStack: TOP SECRET!!!

Reach: 500mm

Stack: TOP SECRET!!!

Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 4.25.08%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=z9JWKv5RyZ5umasKwAKdrDBivVf0

Jotegr wrote:

Honestly equally secret to Oberrohr for everyone too lazy to use a translator app, myself included. 

Sorry, just realized that the contents of that website are, in fact, not available in English.

Now I'm sitting here, having a little laugh thinking about how jarring and discordant that word must sound to anyone who's not used to German pronounciation. 

English: effective top tube length 😊

German: OBERROHR 😬😠

7
FullSend
Posts
190
Joined
7/14/2021
Location
DE
11/26/2025 5:15am Edited Date/Time 11/26/2025 7:04am
One thing that became almost immediately clear in the relatively short time that I have been reading and participating in bike-related internet forums is that the...

One thing that became almost immediately clear in the relatively short time that I have been reading and participating in bike-related internet forums is that the proportion of posters that are good at math is extremely high.  It seems that 1 in 10 is an actual engineer, and the proportion of math-brained folks among the remainder is way higher than the public at large.  

As such, holding back geometry information strikes me as misguided because one's efforts are destined to be futile unless they also refuse to release pictures of the product.  From the moment the bike is portrayed in side profile, you may get one day before some mathematically inclined internet sleuth derives it all and spills your beans for you.  

Honestly, we're probably all just huge nerds.

Or maybe, the sad reality of it is that cycling in general is such an expensive and elitist sport that it mainly attracts people who are financially quite well off. And in most western countries, academic success is very strongly linked to financial prosperity. Rich people, statistically speaking, still have much better chances in academia and generally much better access to higher education. Therefor it is probably not a coincidence that people who ride bikes seem have above average education. 

I'd like to see a venn diagram on this sociology of cycling.

13
yzedf
Posts
248
Joined
1/27/2015
Location
Hebron, CT US
Fantasy
11/26/2025 6:47am
One thing that became almost immediately clear in the relatively short time that I have been reading and participating in bike-related internet forums is that the...

One thing that became almost immediately clear in the relatively short time that I have been reading and participating in bike-related internet forums is that the proportion of posters that are good at math is extremely high.  It seems that 1 in 10 is an actual engineer, and the proportion of math-brained folks among the remainder is way higher than the public at large.  

As such, holding back geometry information strikes me as misguided because one's efforts are destined to be futile unless they also refuse to release pictures of the product.  From the moment the bike is portrayed in side profile, you may get one day before some mathematically inclined internet sleuth derives it all and spills your beans for you.  

FullSend wrote:
Honestly, we're probably all just huge nerds.Or maybe, the sad reality of it is that cycling in general is such an expensive and elitist sport that...

Honestly, we're probably all just huge nerds.

Or maybe, the sad reality of it is that cycling in general is such an expensive and elitist sport that it mainly attracts people who are financially quite well off. And in most western countries, academic success is very strongly linked to financial prosperity. Rich people, statistically speaking, still have much better chances in academia and generally much better access to higher education. Therefor it is probably not a coincidence that people who ride bikes seem have above average education. 

I'd like to see a venn diagram on this sociology of cycling.

What you are describing is called socioeconomic status. 

2
dolface
Posts
1679
Joined
10/26/2015
Location
CA US
11/26/2025 7:12am
FullSend wrote:
Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32Geometry...
Stoll P32

Here we go, it had to happen sooner or later... The first ever production full-suspension carbon XC-Bike with 32" wheels. 

Read more about it here: https://www.stoll-bikes.com/p32

Geometry table is at the very bottom of the page. Though it seems like Stoll won't tell you the full geometry data unless you're ordering a bike. They've got sizes "Medium" and "Large", although people have done the math for the missing geometry numbers and both sizes are very big. The size recommendations seem a little strange, to say the least.

bikelurker wrote:
Spect 5 to 10 years until geometry became sorted. It's the race to be the first to sell that new thing, prototyping is on the hands...

Spect 5 to 10 years until geometry became sorted. It's the race to be the first to sell that new thing, prototyping is on the hands of the early adopter

Stating the obvious here, but once either of the big 2 start shipping a production 32" fork is when I expect things to start really taking off.

(We'll need tires too, but I don't know how long it takes to bring a new size to production; anyone have any insight?)

2
11/26/2025 7:22am
One thing that became almost immediately clear in the relatively short time that I have been reading and participating in bike-related internet forums is that the...

One thing that became almost immediately clear in the relatively short time that I have been reading and participating in bike-related internet forums is that the proportion of posters that are good at math is extremely high.  It seems that 1 in 10 is an actual engineer, and the proportion of math-brained folks among the remainder is way higher than the public at large.  

As such, holding back geometry information strikes me as misguided because one's efforts are destined to be futile unless they also refuse to release pictures of the product.  From the moment the bike is portrayed in side profile, you may get one day before some mathematically inclined internet sleuth derives it all and spills your beans for you.  

FullSend wrote:
Honestly, we're probably all just huge nerds.Or maybe, the sad reality of it is that cycling in general is such an expensive and elitist sport that...

Honestly, we're probably all just huge nerds.

Or maybe, the sad reality of it is that cycling in general is such an expensive and elitist sport that it mainly attracts people who are financially quite well off. And in most western countries, academic success is very strongly linked to financial prosperity. Rich people, statistically speaking, still have much better chances in academia and generally much better access to higher education. Therefor it is probably not a coincidence that people who ride bikes seem have above average education. 

I'd like to see a venn diagram on this sociology of cycling.

Probably?

7
11/26/2025 8:21am
Jotegr wrote:
What the hell is wrong with these companies? Both Stoll and DirtySixer think they can sell bikes without telling people the geometry.  Is this just some...

What the hell is wrong with these companies? Both Stoll and DirtySixer think they can sell bikes without telling people the geometry.  Is this just some kind of rug pull because they don't know what they're doing, and until Trek or Specialized or whoever comes out with a sorted 32inch bike they can trick people into being early adopters with the alure of new-new (be the first on your block!)? This is some fly by night nonsense. 

 

“You think you hate it now, wait ‘till you ride it!”

9
seanfisseli
Posts
570
Joined
4/16/2024
Location
Santa Cruz, CA US
11/26/2025 10:16am

Keep riding good bieks, or be the first to ride new bad bike? Decisions decisions

3
sspomer
Posts
6136
Joined
6/26/2009
Location
Boise, ID US
Fantasy
11/26/2025 10:37am Edited Date/Time 11/26/2025 10:38am

6D partners with HIT (Head Impact Trauma Limited) for crash data recovery - PR here

https://www.vitalmtb.com/news/press-release/6d-helmets-partners-hit-advance-impact-measurement-brain-fatigue-and-concussion-detection

and giant just dropped 3 STP bikes - 20 and 24 are grom hardtails with gears, 26 is a dirt jumper. $790, $1,250 and $1,950 for USD pricing.

Screen Shot 2025-11-26 at 11.37.54 AM
3
pinkrobe
Posts
264
Joined
5/16/2015
Location
Revelstoke, BC CA
11/26/2025 2:05pm

Okay, so we have carcinization for bike suspension, but is there a similar process for clip-in pedals where they all eventually use some variation of Shimano cleats? Spudification?

8
Post a reply to: MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation

This forum thread has been locked.

The Latest