2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

Related:
Scontoni
Posts
26
Joined
7/21/2024
Location
Christmas Island Shire of Christmas Island CX
2/16/2026 9:59pm
xl

Definitely a high-pivot ebike

4
Evil96
Posts
802
Joined
8/21/2014
Location
Portogruaro, VE IT
2/16/2026 10:33pm

There's a 6 piston caliper coming from Hope soon, i've seen a couple on sponsored riders, paired with the new Evo Levers all in full red

4
1
2/17/2026 12:31am
Evil96 wrote:

There's a 6 piston caliper coming from Hope soon, i've seen a couple on sponsored riders, paired with the new Evo Levers all in full red

They’re using the 6-pot again? Thought they decided against it several years ago when they were testing it with the tech3 lever… probably saw that Lewis are selling some 6-pots and decided they want a piece of this pie after all as well… Smile

8
Evil96
Posts
802
Joined
8/21/2014
Location
Portogruaro, VE IT
2/17/2026 1:38am
Evil96 wrote:

There's a 6 piston caliper coming from Hope soon, i've seen a couple on sponsored riders, paired with the new Evo Levers all in full red

They’re using the 6-pot again? Thought they decided against it several years ago when they were testing it with the tech3 lever… probably saw that Lewis...

They’re using the 6-pot again? Thought they decided against it several years ago when they were testing it with the tech3 lever… probably saw that Lewis are selling some 6-pots and decided they want a piece of this pie after all as well… Smile

IMG 8342 0
7
CptObius
Posts
3
Joined
6/23/2025
Location
Hauenstein DE
2/17/2026 2:50am

Internationales de chelva: New lapierre proto beneath anne

4
marsch
Posts
8
Joined
12/1/2023
Location
Altdorf DE
2/17/2026 2:56am

Seems they're targeting the Ballast Bros with this one: 
The weight with pins installed is an official 630 g.
Pins per pedal: 16
Dimensions: 104 mm x 111 mm
Q-factor: 55 mm
Colors: Black/gold
Availability: Immediately
Weight: 630 g (pair, weighed)
Price (RRP) €199.95

Data taken from the German mtb-news.de site.

4
Karabuka
Posts
432
Joined
12/1/2011
Location
SI
2/17/2026 3:25am
They’re using the 6-pot again? Thought they decided against it several years ago when they were testing it with the tech3 lever… probably saw that Lewis...

They’re using the 6-pot again? Thought they decided against it several years ago when they were testing it with the tech3 lever… probably saw that Lewis are selling some 6-pots and decided they want a piece of this pie after all as well… Smile

If I'm not mistaken that "few" years ago was more than 10 😁 And there were almost no ebikes then, but the things have changed since and the need for strongest possible brakes is bigger than ever...

1
Brian_Peterson
Posts
1132
Joined
4/26/2011
Location
Canyon Country, CA US
2/17/2026 3:41am

Six piston brakes for the Surron crowd?

10
2/17/2026 5:36am
They’re using the 6-pot again? Thought they decided against it several years ago when they were testing it with the tech3 lever… probably saw that Lewis...

They’re using the 6-pot again? Thought they decided against it several years ago when they were testing it with the tech3 lever… probably saw that Lewis are selling some 6-pots and decided they want a piece of this pie after all as well… Smile

Karabuka wrote:
If I'm not mistaken that "few" years ago was more than 10 😁 And there were almost no ebikes then, but the things have changed since...

If I'm not mistaken that "few" years ago was more than 10 😁 And there were almost no ebikes then, but the things have changed since and the need for strongest possible brakes is bigger than ever...

You’re mistaken - I’m referring to the protos that were being tested during the 2018/19/20 seasons, not the old ones from 20 years ago. In 2018 there were numerous e-bikes! Wink May be Hope needs to invest in a pair of Maximas, part them out and check what makes them tick in order to be the strongest 4-pots out there, and, I don’t know, reverse engineer the crap out of it! 🙃

2
3
2/17/2026 5:51am
You’re mistaken - I’m referring to the protos that were being tested during the 2018/19/20 seasons, not the old ones from 20 years ago. In 2018...

You’re mistaken - I’m referring to the protos that were being tested during the 2018/19/20 seasons, not the old ones from 20 years ago. In 2018 there were numerous e-bikes! Wink May be Hope needs to invest in a pair of Maximas, part them out and check what makes them tick in order to be the strongest 4-pots out there, and, I don’t know, reverse engineer the crap out of it! 🙃

No need, the Hopes match the Maximas already (according to Enduro Mag's latest testing):

ratings
16
j0lsrud
Posts
93
Joined
7/20/2021
Location
NO
2/17/2026 6:27am

Starling Big Bird 32/29 mullet!

image 593.png?VersionId=KhsRN98IUYt4Fd0FLYg77Oz9
17
4
2/17/2026 7:00am
marsch wrote:
Seems they're targeting the Ballast Bros with this one: The weight with pins installed is an official 630 g.Pins per pedal: 16Dimensions: 104 mm x 111 mmQ-factor...

Seems they're targeting the Ballast Bros with this one: 
The weight with pins installed is an official 630 g.
Pins per pedal: 16
Dimensions: 104 mm x 111 mm
Q-factor: 55 mm
Colors: Black/gold
Availability: Immediately
Weight: 630 g (pair, weighed)
Price (RRP) €199.95

Data taken from the German mtb-news.de site.

Bikeradar has some additional details: https://www.bikeradar.com/news/renthal-revo-dhc-trc-pedals 

snojunkie
Posts
2
Joined
7/11/2021
Location
Salem, OR US
2/17/2026 7:01am
Scontoni wrote:
Definitely a high-pivot ebike
xl

Definitely a high-pivot ebike

TQ powered Sight. Should see info on the builds this week. 

11
Nobble
Posts
225
Joined
9/24/2010
Location
Lakewood, CO US
2/17/2026 7:10am

They say “proprietary binding” but when you go to their website it says “fully SPD compatible”

So what’s unique about them then?


I wish more companies weren’t afraid of deviating from SPD cleats, I feel like they really limit innovation.

3
2/17/2026 7:34am
Nobble wrote:
They say “proprietary binding” but when you go to their website it says “fully SPD compatible”So what’s unique about them then?I wish more companies weren’t afraid...

They say “proprietary binding” but when you go to their website it says “fully SPD compatible”

So what’s unique about them then?


I wish more companies weren’t afraid of deviating from SPD cleats, I feel like they really limit innovation.

What sort of pedal/cleat innovation would you like to see?

9
NWRider425
Posts
8
Joined
10/1/2013
Location
Spokane, WA US
2/17/2026 7:55am

Does CB have a patent that prohibits brands from using their system? Not that I don't like their pedals, but I'm curious why we don't see any 3rd party options for cleats or pedals. Would love a steel cleat that lasts more than a month. 

4
ZAKBROWN!
Posts
97
Joined
8/28/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT US
2/17/2026 8:09am
NWRider425 wrote:
Does CB have a patent that prohibits brands from using their system? Not that I don't like their pedals, but I'm curious why we don't see...

Does CB have a patent that prohibits brands from using their system? Not that I don't like their pedals, but I'm curious why we don't see any 3rd party options for cleats or pedals. Would love a steel cleat that lasts more than a month. 

Silca makes Ti cleats for Crankbrothers, they’re even on sale!  😏

https://silca.cc/products/titanium-cleats?variant=39441748263010
 

7
jsray
Posts
216
Joined
5/20/2017
Location
Gilbert, AZ US
2/17/2026 9:12am Edited Date/Time 2/17/2026 9:13am

Looks like the Ripley SL is out

6
storm.racing
Posts
285
Joined
2/15/2022
Location
Silverton, CO US
2/17/2026 9:16am
jsray wrote:

Looks like the Ripley SL is out

geo changes per size are straight comical. good looking bike though

6
3
Nobble
Posts
225
Joined
9/24/2010
Location
Lakewood, CO US
2/17/2026 9:57am
Nobble wrote:
They say “proprietary binding” but when you go to their website it says “fully SPD compatible”So what’s unique about them then?I wish more companies weren’t afraid...

They say “proprietary binding” but when you go to their website it says “fully SPD compatible”

So what’s unique about them then?


I wish more companies weren’t afraid of deviating from SPD cleats, I feel like they really limit innovation.

What sort of pedal/cleat innovation would you like to see?

I’d like to see more entry methods. Crank Bros are the only pedals where you can just slide your foot forward across the pedal and it will catch. They’ll also re-engage if you just stand on the pedal as you ride. I think that’s the reason they’re so popular with the gravity crowd despite their issues.


Personally I find the “toe down” SPD entry method to be distracting in technical terrain. I’d like something that keeps the ease of entry that Crank Bros pedals have without the durability issues or vague centering. 

With the amount of horizontal space that gravity pedals have within the platform area, I think you could use that space for a wider and flatter clip mechanism.

5
Evwan
Posts
108
Joined
11/18/2025
Location
Sunnyvale, CA US
2/17/2026 10:04am
You’re mistaken - I’m referring to the protos that were being tested during the 2018/19/20 seasons, not the old ones from 20 years ago. In 2018...

You’re mistaken - I’m referring to the protos that were being tested during the 2018/19/20 seasons, not the old ones from 20 years ago. In 2018 there were numerous e-bikes! Wink May be Hope needs to invest in a pair of Maximas, part them out and check what makes them tick in order to be the strongest 4-pots out there, and, I don’t know, reverse engineer the crap out of it! 🙃

iceman2058 wrote:
No need, the Hopes match the Maximas already (according to Enduro Mag's latest testing):

No need, the Hopes match the Maximas already (according to Enduro Mag's latest testing):

ratings

I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. 

I see a few issues: 

1. Shimano XTR, XT, and SLX all have the same mechanical and hydraulic power output, but the test results show them as being wildly different. 

2. They also show TRP DHR evo as dramatically underperforming XTR. Having used both, this is just incorrect... 

3. And lastly, XTR being next to Maven in terms of test results in laughable. XTR is a cross country brake compared to maven stopping power. 

Based on the wild discrepancy between mechanically equal shimano stoppers, I assume their test methodology has large error bars that we are not seeing in the data presented by them.

12
4
ebruner
Posts
339
Joined
3/29/2018
Location
Tustin, CA US
2/17/2026 10:05am
Nobble wrote:
They say “proprietary binding” but when you go to their website it says “fully SPD compatible”So what’s unique about them then?I wish more companies weren’t afraid...

They say “proprietary binding” but when you go to their website it says “fully SPD compatible”

So what’s unique about them then?


I wish more companies weren’t afraid of deviating from SPD cleats, I feel like they really limit innovation.

What sort of pedal/cleat innovation would you like to see?

Nobble wrote:
I’d like to see more entry methods. Crank Bros are the only pedals where you can just slide your foot forward across the pedal and it...

I’d like to see more entry methods. Crank Bros are the only pedals where you can just slide your foot forward across the pedal and it will catch. They’ll also re-engage if you just stand on the pedal as you ride. I think that’s the reason they’re so popular with the gravity crowd despite their issues.


Personally I find the “toe down” SPD entry method to be distracting in technical terrain. I’d like something that keeps the ease of entry that Crank Bros pedals have without the durability issues or vague centering. 

With the amount of horizontal space that gravity pedals have within the platform area, I think you could use that space for a wider and flatter clip mechanism.

Pedal rumors aren't all that interesting... but I can't resist.  Have you tried the new CL-MT001 shimano cleats?  I'm not going to say that they provide exact crank brothers entry/exist vibes... but they are A LOT closer then the sh-51's were.  

1
bnsleit
Posts
116
Joined
9/27/2021
Location
Missoula, MT US
2/17/2026 11:10am

What sort of pedal/cleat innovation would you like to see?

Nobble wrote:
I’d like to see more entry methods. Crank Bros are the only pedals where you can just slide your foot forward across the pedal and it...

I’d like to see more entry methods. Crank Bros are the only pedals where you can just slide your foot forward across the pedal and it will catch. They’ll also re-engage if you just stand on the pedal as you ride. I think that’s the reason they’re so popular with the gravity crowd despite their issues.


Personally I find the “toe down” SPD entry method to be distracting in technical terrain. I’d like something that keeps the ease of entry that Crank Bros pedals have without the durability issues or vague centering. 

With the amount of horizontal space that gravity pedals have within the platform area, I think you could use that space for a wider and flatter clip mechanism.

ebruner wrote:
Pedal rumors aren't all that interesting... but I can't resist.  Have you tried the new CL-MT001 shimano cleats?  I'm not going to say that they provide...

Pedal rumors aren't all that interesting... but I can't resist.  Have you tried the new CL-MT001 shimano cleats?  I'm not going to say that they provide exact crank brothers entry/exist vibes... but they are A LOT closer then the sh-51's were.  

My living room clip in/out tests confirm this, got the CLs on my new shoes and SHs on my old so was able to have one on each foot to really feel the difference. I'm a fan. Can't wait to test on trail!

1
Evwan
Posts
108
Joined
11/18/2025
Location
Sunnyvale, CA US
2/17/2026 11:11am
Scontoni wrote:
Definitely a high-pivot ebike
xl

Definitely a high-pivot ebike

Likely a DJI avinox m2 ebike judging by them hiding the motor 

4
1
2/17/2026 12:08pm
Scontoni wrote:
Definitely a high-pivot ebike
xl

Definitely a high-pivot ebike

Evwan wrote:

Likely a DJI avinox m2 ebike judging by them hiding the motor 

With a 36 up front its appears to be another Sight VLT version. "Sight VLT DJI Gen 4" is the likely nomenclature. 

5
DylanJM
Posts
36
Joined
7/2/2024
Location
Frederiksberg DK
2/17/2026 12:20pm
Scontoni wrote:
Definitely a high-pivot ebike
xl

Definitely a high-pivot ebike

Evwan wrote:

Likely a DJI avinox m2 ebike judging by them hiding the motor 

It appears to have a wired remote (two cables entering the right hand side of the frame) so I don't think it's DJI. The HPR60 still uses a wired remote so most likely that imo. 

11
doktor_jawn
Posts
24
Joined
10/9/2019
Location
State College, PA US
2/17/2026 12:40pm Edited Date/Time 2/17/2026 12:41pm

And, no offense to Norco, but I am not sure they'd be the first to market with a M2 Avinox motor. Atherton bikes said mid-April, so likely Sea Otter. 

Plus, as mentioned above, it doesn't appear to be wireless controllers. 

2
1
2/17/2026 12:49pm
Evwan wrote:
I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. I see a few issues: 1. Shimano XTR, XT, and...

I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. 

I see a few issues: 

1. Shimano XTR, XT, and SLX all have the same mechanical and hydraulic power output, but the test results show them as being wildly different. 

2. They also show TRP DHR evo as dramatically underperforming XTR. Having used both, this is just incorrect... 

3. And lastly, XTR being next to Maven in terms of test results in laughable. XTR is a cross country brake compared to maven stopping power. 

Based on the wild discrepancy between mechanically equal shimano stoppers, I assume their test methodology has large error bars that we are not seeing in the data presented by them.

Kinda derailing this thread now, but a couple of counter arguments:

-XTR, XT, and SLX aren't "wildly" different in the results, there's about 10% decrease in recorded power between each of them with stock pads (they didn't test XT and SLX with the Sinter pads). Since they used the average of 20 decelerations, I would say there is some underlying (=real) reason for the differences.

-TRP's DH-R EVO always felt a bit low on brake-power-to-finger-power ratio for me, compared to several other brakes...

-remember that they tested with constant power at the lever (4 kg of force on the levers for all the test runs). With the same pads and rotors, I have no problem believing that the XTR can land next to the Maven at a specific, constant lever force. This doesn't mean that the Maven doesn't have more "headroom" to borrow a term from the audio world, but XTRs definitely develop quite a bit of stopping power without too much lever input. You call them "XC" brakes but that's just because they use slightly more exclusive materials to keep the weight in check, as you also pointed out they are based on the same mechanical/hydraulic layout as XT and SLX.

Anyway, this discussion should probably move to a brake thread now.

16
Evwan
Posts
108
Joined
11/18/2025
Location
Sunnyvale, CA US
2/17/2026 1:45pm
Evwan wrote:
I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. I see a few issues: 1. Shimano XTR, XT, and...

I wouldn't put much weight in the enduro mag test findings - the results don't make any sense. 

I see a few issues: 

1. Shimano XTR, XT, and SLX all have the same mechanical and hydraulic power output, but the test results show them as being wildly different. 

2. They also show TRP DHR evo as dramatically underperforming XTR. Having used both, this is just incorrect... 

3. And lastly, XTR being next to Maven in terms of test results in laughable. XTR is a cross country brake compared to maven stopping power. 

Based on the wild discrepancy between mechanically equal shimano stoppers, I assume their test methodology has large error bars that we are not seeing in the data presented by them.

iceman2058 wrote:
Kinda derailing this thread now, but a couple of counter arguments:-XTR, XT, and SLX aren't "wildly" different in the results, there's about 10% decrease in recorded...

Kinda derailing this thread now, but a couple of counter arguments:

-XTR, XT, and SLX aren't "wildly" different in the results, there's about 10% decrease in recorded power between each of them with stock pads (they didn't test XT and SLX with the Sinter pads). Since they used the average of 20 decelerations, I would say there is some underlying (=real) reason for the differences.

-TRP's DH-R EVO always felt a bit low on brake-power-to-finger-power ratio for me, compared to several other brakes...

-remember that they tested with constant power at the lever (4 kg of force on the levers for all the test runs). With the same pads and rotors, I have no problem believing that the XTR can land next to the Maven at a specific, constant lever force. This doesn't mean that the Maven doesn't have more "headroom" to borrow a term from the audio world, but XTRs definitely develop quite a bit of stopping power without too much lever input. You call them "XC" brakes but that's just because they use slightly more exclusive materials to keep the weight in check, as you also pointed out they are based on the same mechanical/hydraulic layout as XT and SLX.

Anyway, this discussion should probably move to a brake thread now.

According to the enduro mag test, XTR is more powerful than Dominion A4 and TRP DHR Evo, and close to the same power as mavens. 

I don't think their lab test is an accurate reflection of real world riding, because it's definitely not what I have experienced.

 

5
4

Post a reply to: 2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

The Latest