All

You can get that info from rate curve graphs. It shows the starting rate. The smaller the number, in terms of rate so say .333, the less force required to activate the suspension. If you're reading a ratio graph, then it's the larger the number, like 3 which is the inverse of the above. That only tells part of the story though because force at rear wheel graphs are a more complete picture for suspension activation because that includes the shock's spring rate. This still excludes the behavior exhibited by the shock tune. Overall progression percentage can be calculated by...

Bold New Graphics

Indeed. I've ridden inverted forks on bikes and Motos plenty. We all get to have our opinions on how we like things to ride. The "but Motos use them" argument doesn't really hold up imo. We use our forks so differently and ride such different terrain.

Maybe you could call yourself the winner of Giro d'Italia, Tour de France, the world championsips and a bunch more races if you ran shorter cranks (Pogačar runs 165 mm cranks.)

Saracen

Unpopular opinion:

So Horst Link = Crab Link Linkage Driven Single Pivot = Faux Crab Link High Pivot = Spider Crab Link Single Pivot = Rock Crab Link VPP & DW = Blue crab Link Hardtail = Lobster

You can get medication for that.

Could be the en-PON-ification of Santa Cruz. Deepening of the influence by the corporate overloads. Or maybe SC just like the tire and got a good cost for them. I’m running the Albert Gravity as a front, I like it aside from it running real narrow for a 2.5. Edit: the maxxis WT 2.5 is my gold standard.