2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

Related:
monarchmason
Posts
289
Joined
5/24/2022
Location
Nevada City, CA US
4/2/2026 6:55pm
IMG 0350.png?VersionId=6nNzSDJVb5CrRL3OPP
Eae903 wrote:

The inverted fork from Cane Creek will be 15x110 stock 

some bullshit. Cane Crik does not like pushing the envelope. I was hoping for 17x156.5 but whatever I guess. Ill just have to accept the flex.

8
3
Eae903
Posts
367
Joined
10/20/2023
Location
Laramie, WY US
4/2/2026 7:42pm
IMG 0350.png?VersionId=6nNzSDJVb5CrRL3OPP
Eae903 wrote:

The inverted fork from Cane Creek will be 15x110 stock 

some bullshit. Cane Crik does not like pushing the envelope. I was hoping for 17x156.5 but whatever I guess. Ill just have to accept the flex.

It's gonna be steel too

1
4/2/2026 9:00pm Edited Date/Time 4/2/2026 9:01pm

In regard to front axles and stiffness of inverted forks, the angular deflection of a shaft is defined as θ=(T*L)/(J*G). The key variables for axles are J (polar moment of inertia since we're talking about circles) and G (shear modulus of the material). J for a circular cross section is J(r1,r2)=(π*((r1^4)-(r2^4)))/2 where r1 is the OD and r2 is the ID (zero if solid). As for G, the shear modulus of steel is approximately 3x that of aluminum. Now for a comparison between 15 and 20 mm axles... Lets say we have a solid 15 mm axle and want to know what wall thickness would result in an equal torsional rigidity out of a 20 mm axle with both being the same material. We then solve the equation J(7.5,0)=J(10,r) for r. That yields r=9.09 mm. So a 20 mm axle with a 0.91 mm wall thickness would have identical torsional rigidity to a solid 15 mm axle. That's a pretty thin. Thinner than what any 20 mm axle would have. Now if we were to do the same comparison using a 3 mm wall thickness on the 20 mm axle, the result is that the 20 mm axle is 2.4 times stiffer than the solid 15 mm axle. This is all assuming the pinch clamps don't slip of course, but if the goal is improved torsional rigidity of an inverted fork, a larger diameter axle is a clear choice. 

34
Eae903
Posts
367
Joined
10/20/2023
Location
Laramie, WY US
4/2/2026 9:45pm
In regard to front axles and stiffness of inverted forks, the angular deflection of a shaft is defined as θ=(T*L)/(J*G). The key variables for axles are...

In regard to front axles and stiffness of inverted forks, the angular deflection of a shaft is defined as θ=(T*L)/(J*G). The key variables for axles are J (polar moment of inertia since we're talking about circles) and G (shear modulus of the material). J for a circular cross section is J(r1,r2)=(π*((r1^4)-(r2^4)))/2 where r1 is the OD and r2 is the ID (zero if solid). As for G, the shear modulus of steel is approximately 3x that of aluminum. Now for a comparison between 15 and 20 mm axles... Lets say we have a solid 15 mm axle and want to know what wall thickness would result in an equal torsional rigidity out of a 20 mm axle with both being the same material. We then solve the equation J(7.5,0)=J(10,r) for r. That yields r=9.09 mm. So a 20 mm axle with a 0.91 mm wall thickness would have identical torsional rigidity to a solid 15 mm axle. That's a pretty thin. Thinner than what any 20 mm axle would have. Now if we were to do the same comparison using a 3 mm wall thickness on the 20 mm axle, the result is that the 20 mm axle is 2.4 times stiffer than the solid 15 mm axle. This is all assuming the pinch clamps don't slip of course, but if the goal is improved torsional rigidity of an inverted fork, a larger diameter axle is a clear choice. 

Absolutely, 20mm axles are definitely the best option for stiffness, but they do put a barrier on adoption in the current bike market, and going with a 15mm steel axle, while not as light or as stiff, makes adoption a lot easier and lowers the barrier to entry. It's a problem the industry made themselves since 20mm axles have been around forever, but 15mm became the default for everything but DH bikes. 

4
4/2/2026 10:28pm
In regard to front axles and stiffness of inverted forks, the angular deflection of a shaft is defined as θ=(T*L)/(J*G). The key variables for axles are...

In regard to front axles and stiffness of inverted forks, the angular deflection of a shaft is defined as θ=(T*L)/(J*G). The key variables for axles are J (polar moment of inertia since we're talking about circles) and G (shear modulus of the material). J for a circular cross section is J(r1,r2)=(π*((r1^4)-(r2^4)))/2 where r1 is the OD and r2 is the ID (zero if solid). As for G, the shear modulus of steel is approximately 3x that of aluminum. Now for a comparison between 15 and 20 mm axles... Lets say we have a solid 15 mm axle and want to know what wall thickness would result in an equal torsional rigidity out of a 20 mm axle with both being the same material. We then solve the equation J(7.5,0)=J(10,r) for r. That yields r=9.09 mm. So a 20 mm axle with a 0.91 mm wall thickness would have identical torsional rigidity to a solid 15 mm axle. That's a pretty thin. Thinner than what any 20 mm axle would have. Now if we were to do the same comparison using a 3 mm wall thickness on the 20 mm axle, the result is that the 20 mm axle is 2.4 times stiffer than the solid 15 mm axle. This is all assuming the pinch clamps don't slip of course, but if the goal is improved torsional rigidity of an inverted fork, a larger diameter axle is a clear choice. 

@CascadeComponents  Would making the ends of the axle (that lock into the fork) square or some polygon, increase total system 'stiffness' or 'rigidity'? I think/know non-round axle ends have been tried, but why have they not been popular in these designs? 

2
4/2/2026 10:49pm Edited Date/Time 4/2/2026 10:49pm
@CascadeComponents  Would making the ends of the axle (that lock into the fork) square or some polygon, increase total system 'stiffness' or 'rigidity'? I think/know non-round...

@CascadeComponents  Would making the ends of the axle (that lock into the fork) square or some polygon, increase total system 'stiffness' or 'rigidity'? I think/know non-round axle ends have been tried, but why have they not been popular in these designs? 

If adequate clamping can be achieved, the end shape of the axle end doesn’t make a difference. If you were to have a pinch clamp that couldn’t handle much torque, a non-circular end could be useful. Although in my mind that would be the time to revisit the pinch clamp design as well. 

5
sethimus
Posts
879
Joined
9/20/2014
Location
CH
4/2/2026 10:50pm
In regard to front axles and stiffness of inverted forks, the angular deflection of a shaft is defined as θ=(T*L)/(J*G). The key variables for axles are...

In regard to front axles and stiffness of inverted forks, the angular deflection of a shaft is defined as θ=(T*L)/(J*G). The key variables for axles are J (polar moment of inertia since we're talking about circles) and G (shear modulus of the material). J for a circular cross section is J(r1,r2)=(π*((r1^4)-(r2^4)))/2 where r1 is the OD and r2 is the ID (zero if solid). As for G, the shear modulus of steel is approximately 3x that of aluminum. Now for a comparison between 15 and 20 mm axles... Lets say we have a solid 15 mm axle and want to know what wall thickness would result in an equal torsional rigidity out of a 20 mm axle with both being the same material. We then solve the equation J(7.5,0)=J(10,r) for r. That yields r=9.09 mm. So a 20 mm axle with a 0.91 mm wall thickness would have identical torsional rigidity to a solid 15 mm axle. That's a pretty thin. Thinner than what any 20 mm axle would have. Now if we were to do the same comparison using a 3 mm wall thickness on the 20 mm axle, the result is that the 20 mm axle is 2.4 times stiffer than the solid 15 mm axle. This is all assuming the pinch clamps don't slip of course, but if the goal is improved torsional rigidity of an inverted fork, a larger diameter axle is a clear choice. 

yet it makes no big difference on an intend. i ride my flash 38 with the 15mm option

4
2
boozed
Posts
659
Joined
6/11/2019
Location
AU
4/2/2026 11:20pm
In regard to front axles and stiffness of inverted forks, the angular deflection of a shaft is defined as θ=(T*L)/(J*G). The key variables for axles are...

In regard to front axles and stiffness of inverted forks, the angular deflection of a shaft is defined as θ=(T*L)/(J*G). The key variables for axles are J (polar moment of inertia since we're talking about circles) and G (shear modulus of the material). J for a circular cross section is J(r1,r2)=(π*((r1^4)-(r2^4)))/2 where r1 is the OD and r2 is the ID (zero if solid). As for G, the shear modulus of steel is approximately 3x that of aluminum. Now for a comparison between 15 and 20 mm axles... Lets say we have a solid 15 mm axle and want to know what wall thickness would result in an equal torsional rigidity out of a 20 mm axle with both being the same material. We then solve the equation J(7.5,0)=J(10,r) for r. That yields r=9.09 mm. So a 20 mm axle with a 0.91 mm wall thickness would have identical torsional rigidity to a solid 15 mm axle. That's a pretty thin. Thinner than what any 20 mm axle would have. Now if we were to do the same comparison using a 3 mm wall thickness on the 20 mm axle, the result is that the 20 mm axle is 2.4 times stiffer than the solid 15 mm axle. This is all assuming the pinch clamps don't slip of course, but if the goal is improved torsional rigidity of an inverted fork, a larger diameter axle is a clear choice. 

sethimus wrote:

yet it makes no big difference on an intend. i ride my flash 38 with the 15mm option

You've tested both and settled on the 15 mm?  Interested to know what hub you're using with it, too.

2
dom
Posts
29
Joined
9/29/2016
Location
suze la rousse FR
4/2/2026 11:53pm

I ve got a hope front hub with the 2 different adaptators for 20*110 and 15*110 , you just have to take off the circlips , put the other adaptators and put on the circlips again.

Cornelius ( from Intend) tell me that there is no significant rigidity difference beween the two axle

5
dom
Posts
29
Joined
9/29/2016
Location
suze la rousse FR
4/2/2026 11:58pm
423186.jpg?VersionId=7kIssXGxBYAPjaf
1
Evil96
Posts
804
Joined
8/21/2014
Location
Portogruaro, VE IT
4/3/2026 1:34am
dom wrote:
I ve got a hope front hub with the 2 different adaptators for 20*110 and 15*110 , you just have to take off the circlips...

I ve got a hope front hub with the 2 different adaptators for 20*110 and 15*110 , you just have to take off the circlips , put the other adaptators and put on the circlips again.

Cornelius ( from Intend) tell me that there is no significant rigidity difference beween the two axle

and i believe Intend, i rode the 20mm on the Podium, 2.75kg fork, and my new Intend edge with a 15mm axle, none feel flexy at all under any circumstance, if something, the edge feels stiffer and smoother under braking and corners, while being 2.25kg, half a kg lighter or a pound in freedom unit

3
2
4/3/2026 2:14am

32'' seems like an overly elaborate plan to revive super boost :D

Either way, very interesting stuff by Newmen. 

4
sethimus
Posts
879
Joined
9/20/2014
Location
CH
4/3/2026 2:27am Edited Date/Time 4/3/2026 2:28am
boozed wrote:

You've tested both and settled on the 15 mm?  Interested to know what hub you're using with it, too.

no, i rely on what the manufacturer says on this topic. besides, i rode the flash 35 on 15mm before and had not the impression it needs to be stiffer

hub is the current race face vault (turbine 2 wheels), can't be changed to 20mm

1
6
4/3/2026 4:54am
boozed wrote:
Surely not...Force everyone with <big brake brand's> 203 mm rotors to replace their mount adaptors when they replace their rotors (or switch to a different brand)...

Surely not...

Force everyone with <big brake brand's> 203 mm rotors to replace their mount adaptors when they replace their rotors (or switch to a different brand)?  And everyone who doesn't know about the change then has problems with their brakes?  That would be a disaster.

Edited for clarity

DorianKane wrote:

203 will still be available for a while but not with the rotor thickness the new brake is intended to work with.

But it’s going to happen…

boozed wrote:

So is it just one product line?

As far as I know, yes. But it might be the answer to the late bite point of the current brakes in their lineup. Who knows if they introduce it in the rest of the brakes 

1
4/3/2026 7:00am
Evil96 wrote:
DJI pivot incoming

DJI pivot incoming

IMG 9579
AndehM wrote:
Pivot must think that EMTB motors are like Pokemon... gotta catch 'em all!Shimano EP8, Fazua 60, Bosch CX 5, Bosch SX, Avinox M2... only ones they've...

Pivot must think that EMTB motors are like Pokemon... gotta catch 'em all!

Shimano EP8, Fazua 60, Bosch CX 5, Bosch SX, Avinox M2... only ones they've missed are the TQs.

jsray wrote:

What's the over/under on the DJI pivot base model price?

I’ll bet it’s somehow over the price of the Atherton. In which case why would you ever choose the Pivot?

1
alannz
Posts
51
Joined
1/26/2025
Location
California, CA US
4/3/2026 8:48am Edited Date/Time 4/5/2026 3:11am
MTBrent wrote:
Shiny new tech stored in the filing cabinet!https://orangebikes.com/pages/phase-avinox-model(Still love my Stage 6, regardless of what the internetz tell me about it 😄)

Shiny new tech stored in the filing cabinet!

https://orangebikes.com/pages/phase-avinox-model

2026_PHASE_DJI_Studio_angle

(Still love my Stage 6, regardless of what the internetz tell me about it 😄)

Really missed the opportunity for an orange Fox fork to make the Orange orange-r.

8
ShapeThings
Posts
117
Joined
8/19/2018
Location
Oakland, CA US
4/3/2026 10:04am

32'' seems like an overly elaborate plan to revive super boost :D

Either way, very interesting stuff by Newmen. 

But we all have a suspicion that 148 will be deemed too narrow and 157 is too wide, thus big hub will create new boost ultra 152.5 or some nonsense. 

6
4/3/2026 11:03am
IMG 0350.png?VersionId=6nNzSDJVb5CrRL3OPP
Eae903 wrote:

The inverted fork from Cane Creek will be 15x110 stock 

Will be adaptable I heard, 15x110 and 20x110.

1
4/3/2026 11:06am

Zeb's and the SRAM stuff out on Tuesday.

10
1
alannz
Posts
51
Joined
1/26/2025
Location
California, CA US
4/3/2026 11:45am

Zeb's and the SRAM stuff out on Tuesday.

Any ideas what the “SRAM stuff” is? I’m joining the announcement presentation, but don’t remember seeing any SRAM-specific rumors here after the recent Maven updates. 

1
2
chriskief
Posts
736
Joined
4/15/2017
Location
New York, NY US
4/3/2026 12:13pm

Zeb's and the SRAM stuff out on Tuesday.

alannz wrote:

Any ideas what the “SRAM stuff” is? I’m joining the announcement presentation, but don’t remember seeing any SRAM-specific rumors here after the recent Maven updates. 

Updated Zeb, Lyrik, Vivid air, what else?

3
alannz
Posts
51
Joined
1/26/2025
Location
California, CA US
4/3/2026 12:20pm Edited Date/Time 4/3/2026 12:21pm

Zeb's and the SRAM stuff out on Tuesday.

alannz wrote:

Any ideas what the “SRAM stuff” is? I’m joining the announcement presentation, but don’t remember seeing any SRAM-specific rumors here after the recent Maven updates. 

chriskief wrote:

Updated Zeb, Lyrik, Vivid air, what else?

Yeah but that’s all RockShox. The announcement says:

Please join us on February 24th at 9AM CST to learn about the newest SRAM and RockShox products”

4
Flyboi
Posts
5
Joined
2/7/2026
Location
Bellingham, WA US
4/3/2026 12:46pm
alannz wrote:

Any ideas what the “SRAM stuff” is? I’m joining the announcement presentation, but don’t remember seeing any SRAM-specific rumors here after the recent Maven updates. 

chriskief wrote:

Updated Zeb, Lyrik, Vivid air, what else?

alannz wrote:

Yeah but that’s all RockShox. The announcement says:

Please join us on February 24th at 9AM CST to learn about the newest SRAM and RockShox products”

Heard maybe some drive train updates. Perhaps a stronger clutch and sprocket with fewer cogs for emtb? 

3
Eae903
Posts
367
Joined
10/20/2023
Location
Laramie, WY US
4/3/2026 12:56pm
chriskief wrote:

Updated Zeb, Lyrik, Vivid air, what else?

alannz wrote:

Yeah but that’s all RockShox. The announcement says:

Please join us on February 24th at 9AM CST to learn about the newest SRAM and RockShox products”

Flyboi wrote:

Heard maybe some drive train updates. Perhaps a stronger clutch and sprocket with fewer cogs for emtb? 

Shot in the dark... Mechanical DH transmission? Why wait on it? 

3
Flyboi
Posts
5
Joined
2/7/2026
Location
Bellingham, WA US
4/3/2026 1:08pm
alannz wrote:

Yeah but that’s all RockShox. The announcement says:

Please join us on February 24th at 9AM CST to learn about the newest SRAM and RockShox products”

Flyboi wrote:

Heard maybe some drive train updates. Perhaps a stronger clutch and sprocket with fewer cogs for emtb? 

Eae903 wrote:

Shot in the dark... Mechanical DH transmission? Why wait on it? 

ill be able to contain myself for a week

 

1
joshmtb
Posts
56
Joined
4/17/2025
Location
Haslemere GB
4/3/2026 1:14pm
iceman2058 wrote:

DT Swiss has completely revamped the 1700 series, which covers pretty much every riding discipline from XC to heavy e-MTB. Details here: https://www.vitalmtb.com/news/press-release/dt-swiss-launches-all-new-1700-wheel-series.

Interesting details, they offer XD and XD slim, HG and HG slim both in 148 and 157 widths. I presume this means at least one new hub shell with wider hub flanges for 157, maybe 148 is just using a standard 157 hub shell with a short driver body? Either way it's a cool move for DH bikes and I hope we get the option to buy the hubs and the rims aftermarket.

2
elesdee
Posts
7
Joined
11/9/2025
Location
Calgary, AB CA
4/3/2026 1:57pm

Regarding new SRAM and Rockshox stuff: there will also be a new Super Deluxe Air, and most likely an Ochain announcement. 

7
Onawalk
Posts
344
Joined
7/5/2021
Location
CA
4/3/2026 3:12pm
dom wrote:
I ve got a hope front hub with the 2 different adaptators for 20*110 and 15*110 , you just have to take off the circlips...

I ve got a hope front hub with the 2 different adaptators for 20*110 and 15*110 , you just have to take off the circlips , put the other adaptators and put on the circlips again.

Cornelius ( from Intend) tell me that there is no significant rigidity difference beween the two axle

Evil96 wrote:
and i believe Intend, i rode the 20mm on the Podium, 2.75kg fork, and my new Intend edge with a 15mm axle, none feel flexy at...

and i believe Intend, i rode the 20mm on the Podium, 2.75kg fork, and my new Intend edge with a 15mm axle, none feel flexy at all under any circumstance, if something, the edge feels stiffer and smoother under braking and corners, while being 2.25kg, half a kg lighter or a pound in freedom unit

@sethimus @Evil96 @CascadeComponents 

I love, like love-love, that someone with an engineering background (and seemingly a degree) and a wealth of manufacturing experience provided factual mathematical evidence, and it has been refuted by "I believe the manufacturer of this shiny new thing I bought", like conformation bias doesnt exist or something....

There's a quote about facts and opinions that I'm trying to remember here...... 

it'll come to me....

35
1

Post a reply to: 2026 MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation - Longer and Slacker

The Latest