Hello Vital MTB Visitor,
We’re conducting a survey and would appreciate your input. Your answers will help Vital and the MTB industry better understand what riders like you want. Survey results will be used to recognize top brands. Make your voice heard!
Five lucky people will be selected at random to win a Vital MTB t-shirt.
Thanks in advance,
The Vital MTB Crew
I could be wrong here but aren't the Fox axles semi floating, meaning the hub width tolerance is addressed with this type of design? The forks will align themselves to the axle and not the hub since the NDS side of the hub contacts the axle step rather than the fork dropout. This doesn't address the squareness of the hub itself but remember that the end caps sit against the inner bearing race, which also floats so the miniscule amount that a hub could be out of tolerance will be addressed there as well.
Yes and no. It does float, you are correct. However, there are limits to this. I'm not sure if my issue is due to just the hub, or a combination of the hub + how the fork is built, but my big point is I've "run out" of float. There is no more "room" left for the fork leg to go further inward.
Someone correct me if I'm somehow wrong in my explanation or voodoo science.
Jono Intend achieve it. The Fox axle is floating as well so as long as the hub isn't too wide the hub shouldn't really matter.
Do the new air shafts fit in the older 36 models? IIRC they changed the uppers as well.
Yep... https://thelostco.com/blogs/blog/fox-na3-glidecore-upgrade-and-overview
No 170mm option? Boo, Fox, boo.
We've been using 170mm airshafts in our 36's and wish They made the new glidecore in 170mm for the 36 as i really like the new airshaft(when we are running 150/160)
I've had no issues running 36's in 170mm and saves a good chunk of weight over a 38.
It's been great recently swapping between 150-160-170 on the new Fuel - while trying different setups.
Side note: the new fuel Shouldnt be that good for a 145mm bike. It's really good.
I think reducing to 160mm max is how they got some more bushing overlap, figure it would correlate to 10mm. Somebody more educated please check me on this.
Ouch @jeff.brines
in contrast.. intend guys recommend low cost racing bros seals, and without foam ring, as its not essential for USD...perhaps a god chassis, with good tolerances is most important that the seals ?
Yeah that's rough - modern fork "wipers" all have an integrated oil seal and shouldn't be an issue here. It does look like they have a unique part number for podium seals but I haven't seen one so got no idea what's different. The thick 20wt gold oil can leak easier under certain circumstances (it would leak if you put it in forks with the old flanged seals) but that wouldn't explain the leak in the damper side which should be 4wt oil. So yeah its pretty weird - I don't see new forks leaking that often these days
Ah! I thought they were a bit of a hybrid seal (dust + oil in one seal). Regardless, they are failing and I don't know why. One thing worth pondering, if it was a RSU configuration, and the seal had "failed" like this I'm not sure I'd really notice. Yeah, I'd see a little ring and my dust seals would get dusty faster but what really causes this to be an issue is the fact a column of oil is held back by the seal, which really isn't the case in RSU configurations.
@TEAMROBOT said in his review the seals were 36 seals, and maybe they were for the initial run and they've since swapped to something a bit more "aggressive"?
They are specific podium part number. Fox has the wiper seal replacement guide up on the website now. https://tech.ridefox.com/bike/service-procedures/3125/2026-podium-dust-…
I had both wiper seals leak out of the box. Fox Vancouver just put in the new wiper seals yesterday, they just got the new design this week. So even the current part # isn’t up to date. Fox service guys told me you can put a 36 wiper in, but it won’t last long.
Interesting! Not sure how they got this far without picking it up, and I was going to speculate on other causes but decided against it. I've never worked on one of these
And yeah having more oil on the seal doesn't help, although a failed RSU seal quickly makes a huge mess too. Ideally seals are always "leaking" a tiny bit to maintain a film on the surface, so the RSU fork should be getting at least some oil back up on the wiper. Good lubricating oil sticks to the surfaces so its not 100% relying on gravity. A proper leak is when the oil side of the seal is allowing too much out and the wiper scrapes away the excess. We use those same 36 seals with things like smashpot conversions that are designed to use lots of oil so the bushings are properly saturated and have no issues
Also I found it amusing that they used the same image from a 36 service and took the time to edit the lowers out when they had a podium open at the time anyway? I thought I had a close up of the Podium wiper until I went to check the 36 version of the manual 😂
I have been using the SKF flangeless 36 seals in my Dorado for the last 2 years and they havent leaked a drop. The blue/green ones and no seperate oil seal.
funny how that didn’t occur in those initial, handpicked by fox, reviews, eh?
Speaking of FOX wipers, when doing service on forks in general, do you lubricate them as per picture or put them in dry? RS recommends to put them in dry and, to me at least, it seems to make sense as putting them in dry as they should be held in place better due to more (dry) friction...
I put a light coat. RSU fork I don’t see that being an issue either way.
Rockshox ones go in dry - they are a looser fit/slightly more flexible wiper so there is a real chance of them popping out under pressure, especially on older forks. Fox forks have a stiffer reinforcement ring so I will lubricate them a little bit. Normally just installing a soaked foam ring first is enough, but if they go in dry they will be really tough to remove next time around
Is that still an issue with the current Charger 3 gen?
Hmmmmmmmm....
(JKW's Podium is leaking too)
JKW appears to be leaking due to the massive scratches he has on the stanchions. I don’t think a RSU fork could hold its oil with that much missing material.
Ah! I probably should have watched the whole thing. I thought that was fixed and this was a new thing. My mistake.
The bottoms of his Podium is why I think it's hilarious that some of the Intend evangelists claim you don't need guards for the lowers. What's impressive though is how extensive the damage he has is - there must be a story there.
Every time I'm tempted by a USD fork I look at the scratches on the lowers of my 36. They are no issue on that fork but would be a problem on a USD fork.
Pedal on another bike was rubbing on it in transport.
To be fair, I also didn’t finish the JKW video, his stuff isn’t for me. Like you I just watched until I got the information I wanted.
In full disclosure I have a podium and find the ride quality amazing. The only issue I’ve had is that I now want more performance out of my rear shock.
Oh man... that sucks. Expensive loading error.
Even Phil Swift can’t help you now
The LBS that I'm affiliated with is passing around a fox podium for the core riders to try, we were previously passing around a v1 nine.one. I digress, I just picked up the demo podium to try out for 2 weeks... There was a delay in my ability to try it because it was leaking and needed to be dealt with. We'll see if it leaks in my 2 week stint with it... I'm planning on getting 6ish rides on it. After that, I'm going to try a v2 nine.one...
Post a reply to: FOX Podium Inverted MTB Fork - Questions, Answers, Reviews