Recent Activity
All
seanfisseli Added a reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck*
7/20/2024 7:38am What came first? A forward-biased attack position or a front center-biased frame geo?
More »
seanfisseli Added a reply to MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/19/2024 8:10pm Yep that’s what I heard.
TayRob Liked a reply to forum topic MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/19/2024 8:10pm This jives with what I have heard around and through the grapevine, too. I guess the bikes were damn near ready to go, but something happened when scaling them up for full production. Last I heard there was not even a hint of an ETA for release.
This forum topic has 30444 replies.
seanfisseli Added a reply to MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/19/2024 5:29pm Rumor I heard was that there were major production issues that set the Enduro back a whole year…
seanfisseli Added a reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck*
7/18/2024 12:02pm Alright what about this: The weight of a rider acts on a bike in one manner. But do to the rider being dynamic as well as the system of bike and rider being dynamic, energy/forces are added into the equation. You guys are right, the rider’s center of gravity doesn’t change, but there is still energy/forces present in the equation...
seanfisseli Added a reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck*
7/18/2024 10:08am In a static system I think you’re right? I’m just thinking about force and how and where that force is applied. The forces from outside tbe system (sytem being you and bike) act to effect the CoG (maybe I mean center of mass? Not sure) at the moment of the force. So the equation isn’t “body position on bike” it’s...
dancingwithmyself Liked a reply to forum topic The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck*
7/18/2024 9:41am Glad to see this thread revived. Based on admittedly very limited personal experience with just three different frames, I'm somewhat skeptical of the idea that if a benchmark frame size (e.g., a large) has a front center that is 65.0% of overall wheel base, making all other frame sizes ride as similarly as possible requires that they have an identical ratio. To me, it's felt like a 5% increase in rear center has more impact on ride feel than a 5% increase in front center. Would be curious to hear if anyone else has had the same experience. I am...
This forum topic has 253 replies.
seanfisseli Added a reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck*
7/17/2024 12:35pm Look up videos of why high jumpers can jump so high. They run and turn into the bar to lower their cog. The lower they can get their CoG the higher they can jump….
seanfisseli Added a reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck*
7/17/2024 12:34pm Static CoG is one thing but I’m talking about dynamic. Loading the pedals will lower your center of gravity more than you can lower it through weighting bars. When we push down into the bike our CoG changes, and I feeeeeeeel like where we are pushing down will change that…
seanfisseli Added a reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck*
7/16/2024 10:52pm Thread reincarnation! I wanna talk about chainstays. Have we discussed CoG and how longer CS allows for lower CoG by allowing for heavy feet, while short cs raise the COG because upper body is used to weight the front? My friends with enduros eat shit because they are weighting the bars which is raising CoG drastically. When the bike understeers...
seanfisseli Added a reply to MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 11:06am There are always going to be people looking for progress and other people defending the status quo. Some people will see new bikes and say “great! Just like my old bike!” Others will say “dammit, just like my old bike.” I feel like discussing these points is worthwhile. I just think some of y’all don’t like being wrong
RiderMikeCheck1 Liked a reply to forum topic MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 11:04am The Ripley of yesteryear is officially dead. No longer a light XC bike that could shred trails with 120mm. Now a 130mm bike that's pretty heavy and is actually the exact same frame as the Ripmo (just different clevis and shock between the two frames). This plus weird geo changes... Ibis trying to stay afloat/be profitable by selling two bikes with the same frame--just swapping a part and shock.
This forum topic has 30444 replies.
sspomer Liked a reply to forum topic MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 11:04am continue chainstay length discussions HERE as to not drown the tech rumors out https://www.vitalmtb.com/forums/The-Hub,2/The-Internet-Was-Wrong-Short-… started in 2016, @jeff.brines ' "short chainstays suck" thread can live on.
This forum topic has 30444 replies.
Nobble Liked a reply to forum topic MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 9:38am While that is true, if the front center grows without the rear center also growing, the weight distribution shifts more and more towards the rear. This results in being forced to ride with more weight on your hands which is generally undesirable. IMO, your hands should mostly be used for controlling the bike and fore-aft stability, not for supporting your weight. I’m 6’3” and find that many bikes with short CS and long reach force me into a riding position that I don’t like in order to place enough weight on the front wheel.
This forum topic has 30444 replies.
seanfisseli Added a reply to MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 9:37am Physics is an absolute. We “adapted” to horrible bike geo over the years. The progressive geo trend has been a process to make bikes work better. Saying “bikes don’t need to work better, the rider just needs to adapt” is 2012 cave man logic. We’re still working on finding a good balance between hta, reach, stack, bb height, and cs...
seanfisseli Added a reply to MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 9:32am Man you’re right! Due to the magic of the human body geo doesn’t matter we can just adapt! Lol cmon bro that’s bad logic. if that were true it would work the other way ie you can make a cs as long as you want and the rider will adapt (actually it does kinda work that way, see reviews for...
seanfisseli Added a reply to MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 8:26am Very well put on the difference in cornering.
Glenngineer Liked a reply to forum topic MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 8:26am I'm on team long CS, and I ride mostly tighter, flatter, natural trails. The traction and confidence boost give me, as a 'fast dad' level rider, much more opportunity to push a bike hard through corners and force it through than rely on a bit less wheel base to negotiate a turn. New Ibis geometry is strange - I think we're seeing some fall out from designing one front triangle for multiple bikes. I never wanted a GG for exactly that reason, as much as I loved other aspects of those bikes.
This forum topic has 30444 replies.
seanfisseli Added a reply to MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 7:59am Long cs setting + 160 fork could help a little?
seanfisseli Added a reply to MTB Tech Rumors and Innovation
7/16/2024 7:58am I’d rather have traction any day. A couple centimeters doesn’t actually make it harder to get around a turn, and the overall traction you gain will make up for it many times over. I’ve been riding some of the tightest twistiest tracks and I find it’s only better now that I got a longer chainstay on the bike.