All

Honestly, who knows at this point. The new ski lift installation, which was the reason for the bike park being closed last summer, did not happen. The timber harvest that was supposed to fund the lift installation, that closed the bike park last summer, did not happen The permit for the lift installation, that was supposed to be paid for by the timber harvest, that closed the bike park last summer, was denied due to zoning issues. And lastly; the lift that was already purchased and has sat on the ground for many months, which had it's permit denied, which...

People either don't remember or never read the early interviews with CB. He said early on that the plan was always to fold it back under the UCI banner. He did it separately because the UCI wouldn't fund the experiment so he stepped out to do it on his own. As for EWS itself, they lost the thread. Yes, there has been a slowdown in the industry, but they got a little too big which forced sponsors to dedicate more and more resources. We went from factory riders having limited support to full pit setups with 2-4 mechanics on site...

His right ear is too big

I set up a Spire with a +2 angle set and 27.5 rear wheel (low setting) for my son in law. We were looking for ride characteristics similar to my Raww Madonna V3 (also with 27.5 rear) and we are pleased with the results.

@thegromit About the short trail section, remember that you can always ride the full run (which can be good for the pace) and then cut the section accordingly. You can do it in 3 ways: 1) Apply a selection from the stack or suspension view > Click the "Sync" button on the desired charts/summary/autoTuning to see the applied selection only 2) Save the new section as a new run, manually (apply a selection > File > Save selection as new.byb file) 3) Save the new section as a new run, using a set of saved GPS waypoints. Create or load...

Thanks for pointing this out. Looks like the last columns are not properly shown. i checked the other combinations (SUSP/WHEEL - %/mm) and they're fine. We'll fix it in the next release.

In your position, I would certainly try one approach, then try the second approach as well, to understand how the changes are reacting. Note everything down so you can return to the original point before trying the second option. If you want to reduce the compression speed on the rear (to match the front ones), I would try by increasing the compression first. If the spring is correct and delivering the right SAG, I'd go with the compression clicker (HSC and LSC).

Have you tried the Cannibals? They are seriously good tires

I don’t have the full run in front of me, but based on what’s shown here, I can echo the suggestions from @TheSuspensionLabNZ and @carlinojoevideo. 1) SAG looks fine, but it could probably be improved (playing with air and compression). 2) I’d try better to balance rebound and compression between the front and rear. You can go either way: speed up the front or speed up the rear, depending on which end you liked most. I’d also recommend trying lower air pressure and compensating for the reduced spring support with more damping (which may include revalving). Running the rebound completely...

Based on all the info you posted, I looked at the other data also, you are close! I have Levo 4 with Cascade link also. This was from Motion Instruments data, the numbers are different than BYB but you can still see the balance in them. I think the 3 minute trail recording is more the issue. Like Enrico said, try a short section and run that over. If you can find 60 seconds that has a good mix, even if it’s in the middle of that 3 minute run. Just make a start and stop location. Or find a...

I think that might be a bug where the axes is labelled in mm but the chart is plotting % values - ive seen something similar, it might be a setting you can change, or related to displaying the rear wheel vs position instead of shock position