Hello Vital MTB Visitor,
We’re conducting a survey and would appreciate your input. Your answers will help Vital and the MTB industry better understand what riders like you want. Survey results will be used to recognize top brands. Make your voice heard!
Five lucky people will be selected at random to win a Vital MTB t-shirt.
Thanks in advance,
The Vital MTB Crew
Now I just don't care.
Could this be laurie Greenland & greg Williamson ?
any word on danny hart , looks like the rest of his team have moved on..
Been curious how the dichotomy of 'marketing conduit' and that of information published for public interest works with places like Vital?
Anyway, big fan of the rumor mill and bravo to any organization that is trying to publish 'news'. Love the idea of these calculated marketing announcements going sideways.
generally if we get confirmed news early (from a rider or brand), there's usually an embargo attached. we respect embargoes (advertisers or non-advertisers...it doesn't matter). even when other sites break the embargoes (sam hill a year or two ago was a big one), we still wait for the official release dates, even though it makes us off the back.
if we get 2nd or 3rd hand info that we know is true or most likely true, it usually comes from a source that does not have the authority to make an official statement. we're not going to risk making a claim that could end up being false or breaking an embargo.
the rumor stuff is really fun and intriguing, especially during the off-season. at the end of the day though, accuracy and playing by gentlemen's rules (or even the law) is more important to us than digging too far into a rider's business for some clicks.
with this forum thread, you guys are faster than we are half the time now w/ grabbing social media posts and news. it's pretty crazy! keep it up! is lourdes here yet?
Two thoughts here. One, it is quiet common for very reputable sources to post something that isn't confirmed. (Bloomberg, Reuters, Kara swisher
Two, there are embargoes in my world too. Sometimes they are jumped, and when they are jumped I usually cite the company jumping the embargo as the source. Mind you I work at a subscription based financial news service...
Point is I respect vitals newswire-ish higher ground but did want to mention there is room for "sourced speculation" among higher end publications.
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2015/12/exposed-uc-berkeley-profes…
sspomer keeps it in the correct perspective. The rumor stuff is "fun and intriguing". Nothing more. No reason to get all bent out of shape because some rider won't tell you who his/her sponsor's are yet. Keep the wild speculation going!
https://www.instagram.com/p/BAm_RNhFSmf/
Gwins recent interview on pink bike was very business like in nature and as much as I respect the boy, I think there has been a lot of guidance from a management side of things. Which for his career is a good thing. He also states when looking at new teams they must have a good base or starting point with the bike. Doesn't have to be an immediate winner. On that basis I could personally see him on a slightly more in refined machine. Maybe Scott, Norco etc. Yes carbon mounds can be remade but at high cost as we all know. I think he'll be on an an aluminium bike next year, with which to build on. But then, this is purely speculation
http://www.motorsportauctions.com/category/342/Transporters/listings/33…
http://www.vitalmtb.com/news/press-release/Trek-Factory-Racing-welcomes…
I think this can actually happend, Rocky mountain have the money, and they have a new bike so they need a wc team.
Post a reply to: 2016 Racing Rumours