Modern Geo Talk: Chainstays, Stack, Reach, and Bitching About It

afreak
Posts
18
Joined
11/4/2025
Location
Big Sky, MT US
6/4/2026 2:57pm

That is literally the exact opposite of flickable. 

Also long chainstays doesn’t give you more leverage over your rear wheel, the opposite is true. 

Also, long chainstays ftw

I’m with you

codahale
Posts
98
Joined
9/11/2018
Location
Fort Collins, CO US
6/4/2026 5:47pm

I’m just trying to figure out what they’re flicking. Any clues?

Beans

1
seanfisseli
Posts
582
Joined
4/16/2024
Location
Santa Cruz, CA US
6/5/2026 12:35am

Yea and so what are they propelling with a light movement? The whole bike? No that’s not how it works. They probably aren’t flicking the back end since short CSs put more weight on the rear. Having more weight on the rear means the front will feel lighter and more responsive. 

4
6/5/2026 8:42am

The issue goes back to the thought of only one dimension on the geometry charts giving the bike a certain feeling.. 

codahale
Posts
98
Joined
9/11/2018
Location
Fort Collins, CO US
6/5/2026 8:57am

I’m sorry, if we can’t get mountain bikers to use “loam” correctly, I don’t think you’ve got a chance of educating the masses on “flickable”.

6
seanfisseli
Posts
582
Joined
4/16/2024
Location
Santa Cruz, CA US
6/5/2026 9:48pm
codahale wrote:

I’m sorry, if we can’t get mountain bikers to use “loam” correctly, I don’t think you’ve got a chance of educating the masses on “flickable”.

Fair

6/6/2026 10:50pm

You’ve obviously ridden short Cs bikes and agree they are easier to break loose and move the rear around. A simple explanation is because a slight weight shift forward unweights the rear far more than any weight distribution from fc:rc and a short rear end is obviously easier to move than a long one because it is closer to your feet. But I assume you’re being difficult because you have a theory of your own. Care to explain?

Primoz
Posts
4609
Joined
8/1/2009
Location
SI
6/7/2026 12:41am

No no no, don't go there. We've been over this. Just let it go. We've had pages of trying to explain things back and forth with no success. 

11
2 hours ago
I came back to check in and let everybody know that I figured out what flickable means. I am pretty sure that it means something like...

I came back to check in and let everybody know that I figured out what flickable means. I am pretty sure that it means something like the feeling of standing on the rear pegs of a BMX bike and feeling the whole front end sort of flick around the pivot point of the rear wheel. Of course, on a mountain bike, we don’t have pegs, but if we have short chainstays the flickable feeling comes from the phenomenon of turning the bars and feeling the whole front end flick around, pivoting around the back end of the bike.


 I think that this added responsiveness at the bars is something that a lot of riders like. Especially if those riders are hunched over and putting weight on the front of their bike (a body position adapted to make up for lack of front end grip/bikes with too low of stack…) It would follow that you would want more responsiveness since you are sort of hindering that front end from coming around with your weight. If you were to put that rider on a bike with a more balanced ratio, they might feel like the front end isn’t as responsive because now there is too much weight on the bars, and the payment point has moved forward and so the bars aren’t having as big of an impact on the turning.

I think this is the reason that we have such massive arguments about chainstay length and handling. The people who are looking for a more responsive feeling at the handlebars are not going to like a long chain stay bikes. And people who want a bike that steers better through the feet are going to hate short chain stay bikes. 

Came back for your hat I see

Post a reply to: Modern Geo Talk: Chainstays, Stack, Reach, and Bitching About It

The Latest