Hello Vital MTB Visitor,
We’re conducting a survey and would appreciate your input. Your answers will help Vital and the MTB industry better understand what riders like you want. Survey results will be used to recognize top brands. Make your voice heard!
Five lucky people will be selected at random to win a Vital MTB t-shirt.
Thanks in advance,
The Vital MTB Crew
My bikes are an L sized '12 Intense M9 with 27.5” wheels and AngleSet and an L-sized '19 Mondraker Foxy XR alloy. with a coil shock and progressive MRP spring on 29” wheels. I am 1.91 m / 6'3” tall. There are obvious differences between bikes and reach is about 440 mm on the M9 and 495 mm on the Foxy, so a huge gap. I have tested these bikes against each other last summer on two of the more rowdy and steep tracks that we have, timed them as I could (with Strava) and found out a few things. One of the tracks is rockier and filled with roots, the other one is very steep and very narrow. I took the bikes on these tracks and rode multiple laps in two days, when conditions were very similar. First thing is that the best times, while charging on these tracks, were basically identical. The difference was one of comfort, though. Mental comfort, to be more precise, and it only came from the DH bike. I felt the M9 has a generous cushion and makes me feel in full control while on my runs. This was particularly true on the very steep track, where I felt that I play with the DH bike and just cruised with confidence. The Foxy, though, is a total different beast. While my feeling was that the Intense could give me even more room for error and would forgive me, if I cross the boundaries, the Mondraker emphasized on these rides how quick it is. Scary quick. On the steep track, even though I felt I was riding at the limit and this frightened me a few times, it gave me the impression it could be pushed even further speed-wise.
Bottom line for me, after the aforementioned experience, is this: the enduro bike is indeed a swiss-army knife and boy is it fun! I am riding it in most places, that isn't even a question. But, related to terrain, it has certain limits and if you cross them, it is not very fun anymore and it can feel out of place. I am riding the DH seldom these days. It's either races, bikepark runs or if I decide I do a shuttle session on one of the aforementioned two trails. Regarding races, I have felt tempted to ride the enduro bike on one of the more tech tracks that we had this year, but eventually stuck with the DH bike. I am building a 29er DH bike for next year, so that won't be an issue anymore.
Hope this sheds some light.
Cheers,
Mx
https://www.astonmtb.com/g1-ultimate-bike-check/quiver-destroyer
I just tried it out to see if I could design a usable bike that rode well. First one was good so when covid 19 hit, I used my free time during the lockdown to design the 2nd bike
Side I’d prefer a Trail bike on a flow trail but a newbie feels like Superman on the dh rig.
Plenty of places have the ratio of gnar to progressive flow pretty dialed but the smaller places tend to be trending in the gentrified direction. Especially when it comes to new tracks. The most difficult track on many hills is 10 years old at this point
In the market for new DH frame now, too bad most of the carbon DH frame's seat-tubes are quite short. :-(
FEATURES
• 29” / 27.5” Downhill/Freeride
• 7005 aluminum with CNC links
• Patented Canfield Balance Formula™ Suspension
• 203mm/190mm travel
• Frame Includes Öhlins TTX22 Coil
• Internal Cable Routing w/ Interchangeable Ports
• Seatpost: 30.9mm, stealth dropper compatible
https://canfieldbikes.com/collections/2020-one-2/products/2020-one-2-av…
Post a reply to: Are Global DH Bikes Sales Falling?