Posts
22
Joined
11/23/2014
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
US
Ive read a lot or reviews of the latest and greatest bikes over the years and I've noticed that every time climbing is discussed they always mention that the climbing switch was left open. Ive always been confused by this because the climbing switch on the shock is there for a reason, and the bike company has spec'd the bike with the shock including that switch for a reason. So why when the the bike is put in climb mode is it mentioned as some sort of negative against the bikes climbing performance?
Ive had a a bunch of bikes over the years that all have a climb mode on the shock and I always use it when climbing and I've never seen that has a negative for the bikes performance.
Just curious
Ive had a a bunch of bikes over the years that all have a climb mode on the shock and I always use it when climbing and I've never seen that has a negative for the bikes performance.
Just curious
Using the climb switch somewhat masks the properties of the suspension design. If a bike has a very active suspension design (moves under pedaling loads), the climb switch will just drown that out. Testing a bike with use of the climb switch is ignoring a large portion of the bike's climbing properties and you're just evaluating the effectiveness of a shock.
I think good reviews often say something to the effect of "climbing abilities are impressive. We recommend climbing in the shock's open position on most terrain. The climb switch is beneficial on fire roads or buff climbs" or "standing pedaling results in a great deal of inefficient pedal bob, we highly recommend utilizing the climb switch on the Fox DPX2"
Any suspension design can be locked out to grind up a road without bob, but not all can handle climbing with it open, without pedal bob, or sagging to a point where the seat tube angle is ridiculous. Thats where seriously good suspension design comes in handy.
Post a reply to: Why do bike test always leave the shock in open mode when climbing?