All

Guys, This is one of the most mature, informed and sensible discussion that's happened in a long time, I don't normally both with comments, so quickly do they degenerate to total shit, so props for having an informed opinion and sharing it with others that care about the sport we all love. Oh and f**k the UCI—just as corrupt and power hungry as FIFA!!!

What's the logic behind the opinion that a tighter track is a more compelling race to watch? Think about it; is a race whereby at the first split, if the rider is one or two seconds down the race is over (i.e. like Leogang); is this more or less likely to keep you on the edge of your seat.... ....compared to A track like fort bill, whereby even if the rider is one or two seconds down at the very last split they can still cross the line up and win? With the latter example the race can be won...