Coil Shock Shootout

2/27/2026 9:09am

The Shockcraft tuning kit is easily the most complex out of the three; the rebound circuit is fully checked using a new piston bolt and a one way valve system, the shim stacks configurations for compression & rebound are like nothing I have ever seen, and it includes a new base valve piston bolt as well so all shims are now metric sizing and much easier to source.

The test track is drying out rapidly and may be good to go by this weekend. Eager to get going with this one. 🤘

10
johnsogr
Posts
36
Joined
3/31/2013
Location
Toronto, ON CA
2/27/2026 11:36am

I've also installed the FF & SC Bomber tunes, Shockcraft is much more complicated.  I've never been able to compare the tunes as I had them on different bikes, but am excited to hear your impressions.

2
Friedrich
Posts
1
Joined
3/13/2026
Location
Saarbrücken DE
3/13/2026 7:56pm

Even though the Shockcraft kit is more complex, I found it easier to install. No special tools required. Unfortunately, I have not ridden a Fluid Focus Bomber, yet. Would be very curious how much difference the checkvalve on rebound makes. 

What I love about both shocks is twostage rebound. Too few manufacturers provide such rebound tunes.

1
3/14/2026 12:59pm
Friedrich wrote:
Even though the Shockcraft kit is more complex, I found it easier to install. No special tools required. Unfortunately, I have not ridden a Fluid Focus...

Even though the Shockcraft kit is more complex, I found it easier to install. No special tools required. Unfortunately, I have not ridden a Fluid Focus Bomber, yet. Would be very curious how much difference the checkvalve on rebound makes. 

What I love about both shocks is twostage rebound. Too few manufacturers provide such rebound tunes.

2stage valving isn't always necessary - sometimes a linear stack will give progressive damping depending on the piston design. And vice versa, if the ports don't need much shim lift then the second stage never engages. 

And the effectiveness of the check valve depends on things like the are of the free bleed vs the area of the compression circuits, and also viscosity of oil used. The shims open at a certain pressure, which doesn't change too much due to viscosity. But the heavier oil reaches that point sooner regardless of adjuster position. 

With a stock bomber CR if you keep the factory 10wt oil there is a minimal affect from the rebound adjuster on compression damping but if you change it to something lighter (like 2.5 or 4wt) then you will see a large change. I prefer having some free bleed to help with the shock responding but the piston needs to be designed to work with that, and in theory you expect the rebound adjuster to be set within a particular range so you can manage any minor cross-talk pretty easily. It only gets bad if you close it down fully which nobody would be using

3
4/1/2026 8:58am
This pic was from last weekend, and more white stuff has since dropped (and is continuing to drop). Local riding season may very well be over...
snow1.jpg?VersionId=W4tcVOw8WZg.uSGvu2dWyp 7O

This pic was from last weekend, and more white stuff has since dropped (and is continuing to drop). Local riding season may very well be over, and that means time for suspension projects! There is a lot in the works, including another coil shock test and comparison.

 

                                                                                    The Battle of the Bombers

The Marzocchi Bomber CR (and previously the Fox Vanilla RC) has gained quite a following due to the solid architecture and ability to modify it to suit a wide spectrum of end users. It utilizes a light weight and compact chassis, has a large 27mm main piston, is still available in imperial and metric sizing, and is simple to service. The stock Bomber CR is also inexpensive at $300 retail (when not on sale). A fully custom “tuned for you” CR is less than most off the shelf products offered by various suspension manufacturers, in some cases half the cost.

Avalanche Downhill Racing possibly deserves credit for first working with this platform in depth. The “Avy tuned” Bomber CR has a near legendary status being a coveted product for close to 10 years, typically with a 3+ month wait time for builds. I have had four Avy Bombers over the years ranging from cross country to DH use, all of them have been quite good. 

Seeing as there are currently more options than ever for this platform, it seems like a beneficial and educational exercise to compare some of the best. SWS will be testing the following Bomber CR options in 205mm x 65mm configuration:

Avalanche Downhill Racing (East Coast USA)

Fluid Focus (West Coast USA)

Shockcraft (New Zealand)

The basics of each build will be covered, not divulging actual shim stacks or anything, but focusing more on the differences in modification and approach each company uses. These differences are broad, even with IFP pressures ranging from 150psi to 300psi (stock configuration). 

As usual, BYB data acquisition and Free Lap chip timing will be used. There are also multiple bikes this time; a Transition Spire mullet build with Cascade link and 180mm of rear travel, as well as a Norco Sight high pivot with 160mm of rear travel.

spire.jpg?VersionId=RCbm0WAcdgjIHbSnm3pEsMbEcm9iQsight 0

 

The Avalanche and Fluid Focus shocks have both seen a full season of use, they will be torn down for a refresh and all three shocks will be built up using Fluid Focus 45a bottom out bumpers for consistency. The Avalanche shock will also have the shortened reservoir removed and replaced with one of stock length as well. All three chassis will be identical.

Avy

 

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************

This project is brought to you in conjunction with The Shimmed Base Valve, the clear choice for options and tunability. 😁

Just reread your post here and then looked at the FF piston kit. I noticed that you said all tuning via the base valve, which I wasn't sure if that was a joke. On their site on picture looks like they're using a belleville washer on the main piston. Is this correct? Is most of the valving changes at the base valve? I got a Ohlins tuned through them and they actually told me they removed the belleville washer in favor of a traditional shim stack. I know that architecture is different between the shocks but I was surprised to see they may have gone this direction but maybe its easier for at home tuners to only build a single stack and not have any issues balance between mid and base valves.

1
4/1/2026 10:02pm
thegromit wrote:
Just reread your post here and then looked at the FF piston kit. I noticed that you said all tuning via the base valve, which I...

Just reread your post here and then looked at the FF piston kit. I noticed that you said all tuning via the base valve, which I wasn't sure if that was a joke. On their site on picture looks like they're using a belleville washer on the main piston. Is this correct? Is most of the valving changes at the base valve? I got a Ohlins tuned through them and they actually told me they removed the belleville washer in favor of a traditional shim stack. I know that architecture is different between the shocks but I was surprised to see they may have gone this direction but maybe its easier for at home tuners to only build a single stack and not have any issues balance between mid and base valves.

No, definitely not just tuning via the base valve. But it is modified from stock for all the options being tested. 

The stock base valve setup on the Bomber CR/Fox Van is quite stiff and uses belleville washers. All three tuning options (Avalanche Racing, Fluid Focus, and Shockcraft) remove the belleville washers and convert the base valve to a more traditional shim stack. All three use different base valve tunes, and Avalanche uses a different needle for the bleed (LSC clicker) as well.

Fluid Focus and Shockcraft both use a different main piston, while Avalanche uses the stock main piston. All three use different compression and rebound shim stacks that correspond to the base valve tune they spec. They all use standard shims, no belleville washers anywhere.

Just about ready to start testing shocks. The Vorsprung Telum was run to get a DAQ baseline and as a means of getting the fork setup dialed. This test bike is currently working quite well, the plan is to just swap in each of the three different shocks and keep the fork in it's current state. Also added a shorter track to the test procedure capable of 10+ runs/day. More data, more better!

vital.jpg?VersionId=ZSjfbSlQjrOKMkVylm55

 

16
jalopyj
Posts
106
Joined
10/23/2023
Location
Concord, CA US
Fantasy
4/1/2026 10:28pm

Look forward to the impressions! Is that an intend fork out front? 

2
4/2/2026 6:24am Edited Date/Time 4/2/2026 6:24am
thegromit wrote:
Just reread your post here and then looked at the FF piston kit. I noticed that you said all tuning via the base valve, which I...

Just reread your post here and then looked at the FF piston kit. I noticed that you said all tuning via the base valve, which I wasn't sure if that was a joke. On their site on picture looks like they're using a belleville washer on the main piston. Is this correct? Is most of the valving changes at the base valve? I got a Ohlins tuned through them and they actually told me they removed the belleville washer in favor of a traditional shim stack. I know that architecture is different between the shocks but I was surprised to see they may have gone this direction but maybe its easier for at home tuners to only build a single stack and not have any issues balance between mid and base valves.

No, definitely not just tuning via the base valve. But it is modified from stock for all the options being tested. The stock base valve setup on...

No, definitely not just tuning via the base valve. But it is modified from stock for all the options being tested. 

The stock base valve setup on the Bomber CR/Fox Van is quite stiff and uses belleville washers. All three tuning options (Avalanche Racing, Fluid Focus, and Shockcraft) remove the belleville washers and convert the base valve to a more traditional shim stack. All three use different base valve tunes, and Avalanche uses a different needle for the bleed (LSC clicker) as well.

Fluid Focus and Shockcraft both use a different main piston, while Avalanche uses the stock main piston. All three use different compression and rebound shim stacks that correspond to the base valve tune they spec. They all use standard shims, no belleville washers anywhere.

Just about ready to start testing shocks. The Vorsprung Telum was run to get a DAQ baseline and as a means of getting the fork setup dialed. This test bike is currently working quite well, the plan is to just swap in each of the three different shocks and keep the fork in it's current state. Also added a shorter track to the test procedure capable of 10+ runs/day. More data, more better!

vital.jpg?VersionId=ZSjfbSlQjrOKMkVylm55

 

Whats the new segment? Photo is from north of town.

1
4/4/2026 6:27pm
1000015962.jpg?VersionId=KVgGVIl8PKUIMR

Short review of my DVO Jade X Prime with Sprindex coil: immaculate. 

2
1

Post a reply to: Coil Shock Shootout

The Latest