Hi and welcome to this thread :-) I totally know what you mean, I also have an engineering background and love to tinker with electronics and software. Also my riding level is for sure not as good as many others here in this thread, so I like having data to check if what my "Bum-O-Meter" felt could be correct ;-)...
I'm riding the Heckler SL Model year 2024. It has 160mm in the front and 150mm in the back. The beginning leverage ratio is very high on this bike (Around 3.25). I haven't seen any other leverage ratio this high yet.
Thank you, glad to hear :-) I was thinking the same thing about the dynamic sag, but when I did setup the bike so the rear dynamic sag matches the front, I was a whopping 40psi over what Rockshox or Santa Cruz recommended and the stiffer rear did not feel good. That's why I asked them and got this answer...
Hello together, I was a silent reader for the last few months, but I've also been working on my DAQ system mainly improving the filtering of the data (which was more substantial than I thought!) and the display of the data. Unfortunately it's only been raining and snowing for a pretty long time now so I wasn't able to get...
Hello @mattattostown , Yes I confirm that with the BYB Telemetry software, it's possible to use the reverse leverage calculation (using a linear sensor). We're currently adding the integration for angle sensors too. Best, Enrico
Hi guy's I'd like to join the conversation too. I'm also in the process of creating my own DAQ system since the beginning of this year. The whole idea started because the whole story of Motion Instruments. I tried to reverse engineer the MI system to a certain degree and added my own twist to it. It currently supports just...