Mixed wheel size conversion options

D(C)
Posts
49
Joined
5/15/2013
Location
CA

I’m building up a Wilson 29 and looking into what I could do to run 27.5 in back while preserving geometry. I’m aware of the Cascade Components DHX2 mullet eyelet, but it appears to be discontinued. Also, my current shock is a previous-generation Super Deluxe coil (250x75).


What are my options? Are there any extended eyelets for the Super Deluxe out there similar to the Cascade Components one for Fox?

|
boozed
Posts
656
Joined
6/11/2019
Location
AU
12/27/2025 2:14pm Edited Date/Time 12/27/2025 2:24pm

I don't know if they'll give enough extra length assuming 8 mm hardware* but you could look at eccentric eyelet bushings.  To lengthen the eye-to-eye they need to be in an unstable configuration which gave me pause when I investigated, and one manufacturer (Offset Bushings) markets them only for shortening the eye-to-eye.  However, Burgtec does market them as being able to work in either orientation.

* Some very crude calculations suggest that you'd need to lengthen the shock by around 6.5 mm.

 

D(C)
Posts
49
Joined
5/15/2013
Location
CA
12/27/2025 3:14pm
boozed wrote:
I don't know if they'll give enough extra length assuming 8 mm hardware* but you could look at eccentric eyelet bushings.  To lengthen the eye-to-eye they...

I don't know if they'll give enough extra length assuming 8 mm hardware* but you could look at eccentric eyelet bushings.  To lengthen the eye-to-eye they need to be in an unstable configuration which gave me pause when I investigated, and one manufacturer (Offset Bushings) markets them only for shortening the eye-to-eye.  However, Burgtec does market them as being able to work in either orientation.

* Some very crude calculations suggest that you'd need to lengthen the shock by around 6.5 mm.

 

Thanks, yeah I thought about offset bushings but, from what I have read, they tend to eventually work themselves into the short/slacker setting.

AndehM
Posts
615
Joined
5/7/2018
Location
El Granada, CA US
12/28/2025 7:47am

I used offset bushings "reversed" when I had a GG that I mulleted to help preserve the geo, and had no issues with them flipping themselves.  It's just something to keep an eye on.  I only did 1 offset bushing in the front shock mount.  My reasoning was that the front shock mount doesn't see really any rotation, but the rear does.  If you ran a reversed offset in the rear, that one would definitely tend to flip itself, given how the link rotates around the rear of the shock.

1
D(C)
Posts
49
Joined
5/15/2013
Location
CA
1/7/2026 7:00am Edited Date/Time 1/7/2026 7:01am

Just adding a bit more info on things I’ve looked into.

Without any corrections, running the 27.5 rear wheel would slacken the head angle by about a degree and lower the bb and shorten reach by about 10 mm each.

I don’t think the offset bushing option is worthwhile. My frame has 8 mm hardware on one end and no reducer on the other (connected to a yoke). For 8 mm hardware, the offset bushings only provide 2 mm of offset, which would only steepen things by about 0.3 degrees.

Another option is to run a Works 1 degree angleset to steepen the head angle. This actually looks viable. In addition to correcting the head angle, it would add about 5 mm of reach and bb height back.

D(C)
Posts
49
Joined
5/15/2013
Location
CA
1/7/2026 7:04am

I’m also curious why Cascade Components discontinued the DHX2 eyelet. Was it because of some issue, or was it simply not selling well anymore with purpose-built mixed wheel size bikes being common now?

Post a reply to: Mixed wheel size conversion options

The Latest