JLF1200's Forum Activity

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 3/26/2019 1:12 PM

And regarding the equations to find balance (FC: RC vs WB/2-RC)... there are not large differences in these approaches. Why you think a literal ratio scales "horrendously" is still beyond me, because that's what it does by definition. Your equation,

... more »
Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 3/19/2019 12:32 PM

The confusion is occurring because you're making wild exaggerations to underscore your point. You might also observe that you're the common variable in every bit of contention on this thread so far; perhaps the resolution has less to do with correcting ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 3/11/2019 1:52 PM

Ah, now I get it. You just want the bike that we're all saying we don't want. Good news for you: every single bike being made is closer to 'C' than it is to 'B', in your examples. I think you're still wrong in telling me what I want, however: - The Nukeproof ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 3/10/2019 9:50 PM

Which reviews? I can find none so far. (Although this is a Dengfu open mould frame, and I'm sure I can find a review of that if I look hard enough). Ninjichor-- I still don't understand what you're actually looking for or where your numbers are coming ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/12/2019 10:28 AM

Very interesting point. I experimented with this a few years back, and permanently changed my riding balance and style. But I never looked at it as effectively lengthening the amount of bike behind my center of gravity. I didn't realize that's what I ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/11/2019 11:34 AM

I don't really take offense if Ninjichor wants to call the style of riding I'm aiming for, "defensive." That's certainly not how a spectator would describe it after watching me ride by on-course. I ride at the limit, and I'm looking to push the limit ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/10/2019 8:57 AM

Transition’s ethos has always been “play” rather than “race” and their native trails are high in flow/berms, low in rocks/gnar. The promo videos for the Sentinel were mostly guys hitting huge, tractor made jump lines, which explains a lot. Also consider ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/9/2019 5:30 PM

Playfulness is an imprecise blanket cliche that gets used so often it means almost nothing anymore. Reminds me of "Climbs surprisingly well for a [xxx]mm travel bike." The general MTB public has been coached to believe that a short chainstay = "playful" ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/8/2019 8:12 PM

That is not what's been happening in this thread.

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/8/2019 5:17 PM

Might be a reference to my earlier mention of the SB5.5 (and SB6) as the last of the balanced Yetis, and the 130 & 150 have adopted the trendy long front/short rear design. I think Jeff's responses are spot on here. Ninjichor-- I'm also unable to ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/8/2019 9:29 AM

Yes, so much so that the Vorpsrung video calls his bike (and riding style) out specifically. I know people like to point out that Sam is a freak, but that is painfully obvious and doesn't actually negate the point. He's constantly riding off camber lines ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/8/2019 8:17 AM

Haha If it were only that easy.

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/7/2019 10:04 PM

“Coming from a dirt jumping background, I like to steer my bikes from the hip, not follow whatever the front wheel does. Just pretend you have a laser pointer in your bellybutton and point the bike wherever it goes. ” Steering from the hips is more easily ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/7/2019 6:03 PM

This has been recognized in other sports-- that you use quite a bit of mental energy propping yourself up in extreme stances that vary greatly from a "neutral athletic position." The team physiologists starting arguing about it a lot in pro road racing ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/7/2019 5:42 PM

"Prioritization of handling on super steep terrain, a fondness for rear wheel carves, and enjoying quick manuals would favour long fronts and short rears. A preference for monster trucking through dusty, fast, wide open trails would favour long fronts ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/7/2019 2:32 PM

I have given you some wrong impressions about my preferences. No, I would *prefer* a very long bike with modern angles and lengthy reach. Just *not* at the expense of imbalance between front and rear. I would almost rather race on an older style geo ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/7/2019 1:18 PM

I'm looking for bikes that sit close to the 1.7 FC:RC mark (or, a chainstay that is ~ 60% of the front-center). I haven't done the dual scale test to see what the weighting results are from that arrangement. I just know that bikes with that relationship ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/7/2019 1:15 PM

The SB5.5 and SB6 have better numbers than either of the newer Yetis (130 & 150), as well as any bike released this year as far as I know. Which is sad because Yeti used to be great about making balanced, neutral riding bikes. They've drunk the kool ... more »

Reply to The Internet Was Wrong: Short Chainstays Suck* 2/7/2019 12:24 PM

Jeff, I would be extremely interested in custom stays for my Sentinel. Being on a medium, I would be looking for ~450mm to get the FC:RC number where I want it. How are you going about this project?