Edited Date/Time:
I got the impression, in so many words, from the Vital admin that piped in right out of the box and those employees of this sites' advertisers that sponsorships for those who are anything but 'pros' are bad not only for racing, but for LBS and the industry as a whole.
So assuming all of that or a close variation of what I've just e-speculated is correct, consider this:
We'll call these the Pros:
1. Vitalmtb provides above par race, product, competition, etc... coverage as compared to just about any other mtb website out there.
2. The writing, content and volume of coverage-again is well above anything else out there.
3. Vitalmtb provides and excellent forum to discuss the sport, explore ideas-and put up with dicks like myself.
We'll call these the Cons:
1. Vitalmtb accepts advertising dollars and displays ads from businesses who provide and promote 'Grassroots Sponsorships' to those like the '35 year old Cat3 racer who only race a couple times a year'. Some ads are even direct advertisements of said 'grassroots deals.'
2. Vitalmtb accepts advertising dollars and displays ads from businesses who are primarily online e-tailers.
3. Vitalmtb publishes detailed reviews of products that are up for grabs in 'grassroots sponsorships' or even sold directly to the customer from the manufacturer.
So. If we're all 'core here and play the 'support the LBS' card. How do you answer the cons which, IMO, take away from the LBS and thus 'the sport'?
Is it just business and way of life? Certainly, but then how do you respond to those in these forums who are supplying and accepting the advertising dollars? Conflict of interest? Definitely. Does it matter, probably not. And how do you respond to those LBS guys out there playing by the rules? I don't recall ever seeing an advertisement on this website for a non-online, brick and morter only store. Why is that?
And what do you say to the Cat3 racers who can maybe only afford to race a couple times a year or just can't get mom up early enough to drive them an hour away to race? Are they not as worthy as anyone else? Do you think that without that 35 year old's entry fee from time to time that your race series will survive. Or does it not matter because they're not 'Pro' or work at a shop?
And what the f#ck is a 'pro' anyway? The football player making $30million a year who ends up in jail after he beats his wife? Or is it the Pro mountain biker DH racer/freerider ending up in Shimano Dual Control shifter ads with their two fingers held up in the 'peace sign' promoting a product they never used, never will and then end up on YouTube taking a hammer to that product while it's held in a vice? Or is it the pro posting on web forums that if you're a beginner trying to figure this whole mess out that you are deserving of nothing?
I would venture to say that you'll find a lot more passion out there amongst the rank and file Joe Schmo Cat 3 or recreational riders than you will with any business transaction website or store. A business is a business and advertising is just advertising. You may have 'passion' for it or feel you're somehow doing it for the greater good, but at the end of the day its still a simple business transaction.
So having said that, I think that if it's the stance of VITALMTB and some of its advertisers employess that Grassroots programs are bad for the sport, hurting their business (pretty odd thing to say) and ruining racing, then they should cease accepting advertising dollars and pull ads from every company or business that has anything to do with those types of deals. Seems it would eleviate any conflict of interest issues.
Flame on....
Sorry in advance for the gramatical errors, including the title of the thread. My coffee hasn't entirely kicked in yet this am. And keep in mind that this is just a debate topic. My stance falls somewhere on both sides of the coin.
Suck All You Want. I'll Make More.
