Photos: 13 (2 albums)
Forum topics started: 5
Forum replies: 104
Profile comments: 2
That was amazing. Well done Vital. This stuff is great.
This video has 6 comments.
Unreal. Angel crashes. Doesn't remember the crash and they start looking at his hand?! Obviously no idea how much more diagnostic stuff they did but sure looks like there wasn't much attention to something far bigger...
Seriously, someone needs to raise the concussion question as these events. Culturally, it has to get a bit more attention and understanding from everyone involved.
This video has 3 comments.
Is Graeme Mudd on flat pedal shoes on mallets?!
This slideshow has 9 comments.
Your logic is a bit off here. Putting on a world cup is already incredibly expensive. The checks the athletes walk away with his hardly a reflection of the total cost to run such an event.
1) Though a neurologist would be ideal, any medical professional trained in post concussive management would work in this situation. The testing protocol Jonty was suggesting is widely used in a number of sports (including HIGH SCHOOL - where the checks are non existent) and far from expensive to implement. Once you have an objective baseline you don't need a specialist to say "yeah, you need to go to the hospital, your tests are way off".
2) The costs of whatever program is decided, spread over all athletes and teams wouldn't be material.
Again, I'm not sure you understand the importance of this problem. I, unfortunately, live it more days than I care to admit.
This slideshow has 4 comments.
I'm with Oz_Taylor. Not saying either will win but Mik and Troy can both lay power down when they need to. Troy seems to always be fit. Mik waivers with the years but has the potential to be one of the most fit athletes in the sport.
This news blog has 15 comments.
Jonty Neethling nailing it. There are way too many un-diagnosed concussions out there. Its the rest of your life you are playing with. UCI wants to ban disc brakes from road racing but won't bring a neurologist to the races? Sounds about par for the course for the most ass backwards organization in sports.
Follow up: Indeed you are right - it was a 125mm dropper. I do agree a 150mm would be more fitting. Look for this feedback (and more) when I do my longer term review.
This product_review has 22 comments.
I would happily post my gimbal setup but honestly I can't recommend it. I've broken so many!
This video has 13 comments.
Great question. I'll know shortly! I felt as though it was a 150mm but I could be mistaken. If it is a 125mm, I do fully agree this should be 150 (or greater) in the XL size.
This video has 1 comment.
To add to Sspomer's post, one needs to open their mind up a little bit. There will never be "one bike" (or wheel size) that is "better". Better for me? Maybe. Better for where I live? Sure. Better for the type of riding I do? Absolutely.
Take a nod from other "tool oriented" sports such as surfing or skiing. There is no "best" set of skis or surfboard.
Though it may be overly hard to decide which bike is best for you, I give Yeti kudos for making so many different bikes aimed toward real riders on real trails.
Put another way, watch the EWS coming up - I'll bet you see their team on every bike they make through the season proving there is no "best bike". Just most fitting. Its up to you to decide which one will compliment your riding style
To piss Team Robot off...
You do bring up a valid point which I will be taking into consideration when I do my longer term test shortly. However, Yeti is very clearly not interested in making "budget oriented" bike the same way Porsche isn't really doing their part to offer an affordable car to the masses. I talked at length with Yeti about how often they've retooled over the last 10 years for new designs. (its a lot) This sort of progression comes at a price, but I can say, thus far their suspension design is very unique and very special. Is it worth the money? I don't know. But I don't hear many Ferrari drivers make a horsepower to dollar comparison. You are getting something special, and that comes at a price.
That said, the GX build doesn't suck and is sub $6K..
Ha! Don't worry. I temporarily broke my gimbal smashing it into the seat on said "bottom out testing" the following day. There are some excellent old school ankle testing drops all over Porcupine. And I did my best to find them all.
This is what I told Fisher when he handed me the bike. https://youtu.be/4T2GmGSNvaM?t=118 He was less than pleased. Ha.
Great question. I do believe there is a *slight* benefit to boost but its not worth writing home about. Chainline was good and rear end stiffness of the class-leading variety, though this is likely a result of the rear end engineering/materials used, not boost. End of the day, I wouldn't get hung up on Boost vs non boost but the other attributes of this bike which thus far have proven very well thought out.
Thanks guys. Throw any questions you may have here and I'll do my best to answer.
Fun looking team!
This video has 2 comments.
...And I'm saying the area changes. (it gets bigger at the same PSI...sidewall get shorter, contact patch gets wider. All in, its bigger)
This product_review has 23 comments.
I hear you but I disagree. Depending on rider weight, terrain and style, 35ish PSI can be normal on conventional rims running lighter casing tires. Now, its absolutely firm for the new wider stuff but in my experience I still end up in the high twenties even with my 30mm internal carbon rims. But I'm fat, slow and hackish...